Cargando…

Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuo, Wen, Liu, Hualong, Fu, Linghua, Fan, Weiguo, Hong, Kui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686
_version_ 1784897175942070272
author Zhuo, Wen
Liu, Hualong
Fu, Linghua
Fan, Weiguo
Hong, Kui
author_facet Zhuo, Wen
Liu, Hualong
Fu, Linghua
Fan, Weiguo
Hong, Kui
author_sort Zhuo, Wen
collection PubMed
description Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9967079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99670792023-02-26 Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhuo, Wen Liu, Hualong Fu, Linghua Fan, Weiguo Hong, Kui J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. MDPI 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9967079/ /pubmed/36836221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Zhuo, Wen
Liu, Hualong
Fu, Linghua
Fan, Weiguo
Hong, Kui
Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of digitalis on icd or crt-d recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuowen effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhualong effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fulinghua effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanweiguo effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongkui effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis