Cargando…
Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686 |
_version_ | 1784897175942070272 |
---|---|
author | Zhuo, Wen Liu, Hualong Fu, Linghua Fan, Weiguo Hong, Kui |
author_facet | Zhuo, Wen Liu, Hualong Fu, Linghua Fan, Weiguo Hong, Kui |
author_sort | Zhuo, Wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9967079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99670792023-02-26 Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhuo, Wen Liu, Hualong Fu, Linghua Fan, Weiguo Hong, Kui J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. MDPI 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9967079/ /pubmed/36836221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Zhuo, Wen Liu, Hualong Fu, Linghua Fan, Weiguo Hong, Kui Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effect of digitalis on icd or crt-d recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuowen effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuhualong effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fulinghua effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanweiguo effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongkui effectofdigitalisonicdorcrtdrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |