Cargando…
Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery
Vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is one of the most widely performed precise procedures in ophthalmic surgery; the majority of cases are carried out under regional anaesthesia (RA) only. However, in specific situations (such as when the patient fails to cooperate with the operator for various reasons), g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020505 |
_version_ | 1784897248288571392 |
---|---|
author | Stasiowski, Michał Jan Pluta, Aleksandra Lyssek-Boroń, Anita Niewiadomska, Ewa Krawczyk, Lech Dobrowolski, Dariusz Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Kawka, Magdalena Rejdak, Robert Szumera, Izabela Missir, Anna Hołyś, Przemysław Jałowiecki, Przemysław |
author_facet | Stasiowski, Michał Jan Pluta, Aleksandra Lyssek-Boroń, Anita Niewiadomska, Ewa Krawczyk, Lech Dobrowolski, Dariusz Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Kawka, Magdalena Rejdak, Robert Szumera, Izabela Missir, Anna Hołyś, Przemysław Jałowiecki, Przemysław |
author_sort | Stasiowski, Michał Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is one of the most widely performed precise procedures in ophthalmic surgery; the majority of cases are carried out under regional anaesthesia (RA) only. However, in specific situations (such as when the patient fails to cooperate with the operator for various reasons), general anaesthesia (GA), alone or in combination with GA (combined general–regional anaesthesia, CGR), is the only safe way to perform VRS. While monitoring the efficacy of an intraoperative rescue opioid analgesia (IROA) during surgery (assessing the adequacy of anaesthesia (AoA)) may be challenging, the surgical pleth index (SPI) is a useful tool for detecting the reaction to noxious stimuli and allows for the rational titration of opioid analgesics (AO) during surgery. The current study investigated the influence of the SPI-based titration of fentanyl (FNT) in combination with various pre-emptive analgesia (PA) techniques on intraoperative pain perception during various stages of VRS performed under AoA. A total of 176 patients undergoing VRS under GA were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the five following study arms: Group GA (control group)—patients who received general anaesthesia alone; Group PBB—GA with preprocedural peribulbar block (with 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine); Group T—GA with preventive, topical 2% proparacaine; Group M—GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of metamizole; and Group P—GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of paracetamol. The whole procedure was divided in four stages: Stage 1 and 2—preoperative assessment, PA administration, and the induction of GA; Stage 3—intraoperative observation; Stage 4—postoperative observation. the SPI values were monitored during all stages. The occurrence of nociception (expressed as ∆SPI >15) during various manipulations in the surgical field was observed, as were cumulative doses of rescue analgesia, depending on the PA administered. During the course of VRS, rescue FNT doses varied depending on the stage of surgery and the group investigated. The majority of patients, regardless of their group allocation, needed complementary analgesia during trocar insertion, with Group GA patients requiring the highest doses. Likewise, the highest cumulative doses of IROA were noted during endophotocoagulation in Group GA. Preventive PBB and topical anaesthesia were proven to be most efficient in blunting the response to speculum installation, while topical anaesthesia and paracetamol infusion were shown to be more efficient analgesics during endophotocoagulation than other types used PA. In the performed study, none of the PA techniques used were superior to GA with FNT dosing under the SPI with respect to providing efficient analgesia throughout the whole surgery; there was a necessity to administer a rescue OA dose in both the control and investigated groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9967373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99673732023-02-26 Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery Stasiowski, Michał Jan Pluta, Aleksandra Lyssek-Boroń, Anita Niewiadomska, Ewa Krawczyk, Lech Dobrowolski, Dariusz Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Kawka, Magdalena Rejdak, Robert Szumera, Izabela Missir, Anna Hołyś, Przemysław Jałowiecki, Przemysław Life (Basel) Article Vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is one of the most widely performed precise procedures in ophthalmic surgery; the majority of cases are carried out under regional anaesthesia (RA) only. However, in specific situations (such as when the patient fails to cooperate with the operator for various reasons), general anaesthesia (GA), alone or in combination with GA (combined general–regional anaesthesia, CGR), is the only safe way to perform VRS. While monitoring the efficacy of an intraoperative rescue opioid analgesia (IROA) during surgery (assessing the adequacy of anaesthesia (AoA)) may be challenging, the surgical pleth index (SPI) is a useful tool for detecting the reaction to noxious stimuli and allows for the rational titration of opioid analgesics (AO) during surgery. The current study investigated the influence of the SPI-based titration of fentanyl (FNT) in combination with various pre-emptive analgesia (PA) techniques on intraoperative pain perception during various stages of VRS performed under AoA. A total of 176 patients undergoing VRS under GA were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the five following study arms: Group GA (control group)—patients who received general anaesthesia alone; Group PBB—GA with preprocedural peribulbar block (with 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine); Group T—GA with preventive, topical 2% proparacaine; Group M—GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of metamizole; and Group P—GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of paracetamol. The whole procedure was divided in four stages: Stage 1 and 2—preoperative assessment, PA administration, and the induction of GA; Stage 3—intraoperative observation; Stage 4—postoperative observation. the SPI values were monitored during all stages. The occurrence of nociception (expressed as ∆SPI >15) during various manipulations in the surgical field was observed, as were cumulative doses of rescue analgesia, depending on the PA administered. During the course of VRS, rescue FNT doses varied depending on the stage of surgery and the group investigated. The majority of patients, regardless of their group allocation, needed complementary analgesia during trocar insertion, with Group GA patients requiring the highest doses. Likewise, the highest cumulative doses of IROA were noted during endophotocoagulation in Group GA. Preventive PBB and topical anaesthesia were proven to be most efficient in blunting the response to speculum installation, while topical anaesthesia and paracetamol infusion were shown to be more efficient analgesics during endophotocoagulation than other types used PA. In the performed study, none of the PA techniques used were superior to GA with FNT dosing under the SPI with respect to providing efficient analgesia throughout the whole surgery; there was a necessity to administer a rescue OA dose in both the control and investigated groups. MDPI 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9967373/ /pubmed/36836862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020505 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stasiowski, Michał Jan Pluta, Aleksandra Lyssek-Boroń, Anita Niewiadomska, Ewa Krawczyk, Lech Dobrowolski, Dariusz Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Kawka, Magdalena Rejdak, Robert Szumera, Izabela Missir, Anna Hołyś, Przemysław Jałowiecki, Przemysław Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title | Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title_full | Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title_fullStr | Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title_short | Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Nociception Detection during Vitreoretinal Surgery |
title_sort | adequacy of anaesthesia for nociception detection during vitreoretinal surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stasiowskimichałjan adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT plutaaleksandra adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT lyssekboronanita adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT niewiadomskaewa adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT krawczyklech adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT dobrowolskidariusz adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT grabarekbeniaminoskar adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT kawkamagdalena adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT rejdakrobert adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT szumeraizabela adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT missiranna adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT hołysprzemysław adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery AT jałowieckiprzemysław adequacyofanaesthesiafornociceptiondetectionduringvitreoretinalsurgery |