Cargando…

Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sierra, Gracia, Berglas, Nancy F., Hofler, Lisa G., Grossman, Daniel, Roberts, Sarah C. M., White, Kari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679
_version_ 1784897290891165696
author Sierra, Gracia
Berglas, Nancy F.
Hofler, Lisa G.
Grossman, Daniel
Roberts, Sarah C. M.
White, Kari
author_facet Sierra, Gracia
Berglas, Nancy F.
Hofler, Lisa G.
Grossman, Daniel
Roberts, Sarah C. M.
White, Kari
author_sort Sierra, Gracia
collection PubMed
description During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We received data on Texans who obtained abortions between February and May 2020 at 25 facilities in six nearby states. We estimated weekly trends in the number of out-of-state abortions related to the order using segmented regression models. We compared the distribution of out-of-state abortions by county-level economic deprivation and distance traveled. The number of Texas out-of-state abortions increased 14% the week after (versus before) the order was implemented (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.63), and increased weekly while the order remained in effect (IRR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.18). Residents of the most economically disadvantaged counties accounted for 52% and 12% of out-of-state abortions before and during the order, respectively (p < 0.001). Before the order, 38% of Texans traveled ≥250 miles one way, whereas during the order 81% traveled ≥250 miles (p < 0.001). Texans’ long-distance travel for out-of-state abortion care and the socioeconomic composition of those less likely to travel reflect potential burdens imposed by future abortion bans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9967543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99675432023-02-27 Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic Sierra, Gracia Berglas, Nancy F. Hofler, Lisa G. Grossman, Daniel Roberts, Sarah C. M. White, Kari Int J Environ Res Public Health Article During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We received data on Texans who obtained abortions between February and May 2020 at 25 facilities in six nearby states. We estimated weekly trends in the number of out-of-state abortions related to the order using segmented regression models. We compared the distribution of out-of-state abortions by county-level economic deprivation and distance traveled. The number of Texas out-of-state abortions increased 14% the week after (versus before) the order was implemented (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.63), and increased weekly while the order remained in effect (IRR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.18). Residents of the most economically disadvantaged counties accounted for 52% and 12% of out-of-state abortions before and during the order, respectively (p < 0.001). Before the order, 38% of Texans traveled ≥250 miles one way, whereas during the order 81% traveled ≥250 miles (p < 0.001). Texans’ long-distance travel for out-of-state abortion care and the socioeconomic composition of those less likely to travel reflect potential burdens imposed by future abortion bans. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9967543/ /pubmed/36834376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sierra, Gracia
Berglas, Nancy F.
Hofler, Lisa G.
Grossman, Daniel
Roberts, Sarah C. M.
White, Kari
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title_full Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title_fullStr Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title_short Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
title_sort out-of-state travel for abortion among texas residents following an executive order suspending in-state services during the coronavirus pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679
work_keys_str_mv AT sierragracia outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic
AT berglasnancyf outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic
AT hoflerlisag outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic
AT grossmandaniel outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic
AT robertssarahcm outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic
AT whitekari outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic