Cargando…
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic
During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We rece...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679 |
_version_ | 1784897290891165696 |
---|---|
author | Sierra, Gracia Berglas, Nancy F. Hofler, Lisa G. Grossman, Daniel Roberts, Sarah C. M. White, Kari |
author_facet | Sierra, Gracia Berglas, Nancy F. Hofler, Lisa G. Grossman, Daniel Roberts, Sarah C. M. White, Kari |
author_sort | Sierra, Gracia |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We received data on Texans who obtained abortions between February and May 2020 at 25 facilities in six nearby states. We estimated weekly trends in the number of out-of-state abortions related to the order using segmented regression models. We compared the distribution of out-of-state abortions by county-level economic deprivation and distance traveled. The number of Texas out-of-state abortions increased 14% the week after (versus before) the order was implemented (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.63), and increased weekly while the order remained in effect (IRR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.18). Residents of the most economically disadvantaged counties accounted for 52% and 12% of out-of-state abortions before and during the order, respectively (p < 0.001). Before the order, 38% of Texans traveled ≥250 miles one way, whereas during the order 81% traveled ≥250 miles (p < 0.001). Texans’ long-distance travel for out-of-state abortion care and the socioeconomic composition of those less likely to travel reflect potential burdens imposed by future abortion bans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9967543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99675432023-02-27 Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic Sierra, Gracia Berglas, Nancy F. Hofler, Lisa G. Grossman, Daniel Roberts, Sarah C. M. White, Kari Int J Environ Res Public Health Article During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people’s access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients’ out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We received data on Texans who obtained abortions between February and May 2020 at 25 facilities in six nearby states. We estimated weekly trends in the number of out-of-state abortions related to the order using segmented regression models. We compared the distribution of out-of-state abortions by county-level economic deprivation and distance traveled. The number of Texas out-of-state abortions increased 14% the week after (versus before) the order was implemented (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.63), and increased weekly while the order remained in effect (IRR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.18). Residents of the most economically disadvantaged counties accounted for 52% and 12% of out-of-state abortions before and during the order, respectively (p < 0.001). Before the order, 38% of Texans traveled ≥250 miles one way, whereas during the order 81% traveled ≥250 miles (p < 0.001). Texans’ long-distance travel for out-of-state abortion care and the socioeconomic composition of those less likely to travel reflect potential burdens imposed by future abortion bans. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9967543/ /pubmed/36834376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sierra, Gracia Berglas, Nancy F. Hofler, Lisa G. Grossman, Daniel Roberts, Sarah C. M. White, Kari Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title | Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title_full | Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title_short | Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic |
title_sort | out-of-state travel for abortion among texas residents following an executive order suspending in-state services during the coronavirus pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sierragracia outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic AT berglasnancyf outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic AT hoflerlisag outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic AT grossmandaniel outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic AT robertssarahcm outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic AT whitekari outofstatetravelforabortionamongtexasresidentsfollowinganexecutiveordersuspendinginstateservicesduringthecoronaviruspandemic |