Cargando…

Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?

Weeds have always been considered an insidious enemy, capable of reducing crop production. Conversely, the agroecological vision attributes a key role to the spontaneous flora in promoting plant diversity and belowground interactions, which may improve the ecological performance of agroecosystems. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trinchera, Alessandra, Warren Raffa, Dylan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020334
_version_ 1784897379559800832
author Trinchera, Alessandra
Warren Raffa, Dylan
author_facet Trinchera, Alessandra
Warren Raffa, Dylan
author_sort Trinchera, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description Weeds have always been considered an insidious enemy, capable of reducing crop production. Conversely, the agroecological vision attributes a key role to the spontaneous flora in promoting plant diversity and belowground interactions, which may improve the ecological performance of agroecosystems. We summarized the literature on the weeds’ arbuscular–mycorrhizae (AM) interaction and we analyzed evidence on the: (i) AM suppressive/selective effect on weed communities; (ii) effect of weeds on AM colonization, and (iii) positive role of AM-supporting weeds on forming shared mycorrhizal hyphal connections in agroecosystems. While some authors conceptualized AM as a weed control tool, others underlined their selective effect on weed communities. Recent studies suggest that AM-host weeds can participate in the development of a common mycorrhizal mycelial network (MMN) among different plants species. Nevertheless, direct evidence of the actual exchange of nutrients and C between coexisting plants through MMN in agroecosystems is missing. Although the effect of agricultural practices on plant community-AM interactions are complex, more conservative farming management seems to foster AM populations. Future studies should focus on: (i) field studies, (ii) weed communities and their traits, rather than on the most abundant species, and (iii) the use of advanced analytical techniques, able to monitor MMN development and functionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9967897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99678972023-02-27 Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems? Trinchera, Alessandra Warren Raffa, Dylan Microorganisms Review Weeds have always been considered an insidious enemy, capable of reducing crop production. Conversely, the agroecological vision attributes a key role to the spontaneous flora in promoting plant diversity and belowground interactions, which may improve the ecological performance of agroecosystems. We summarized the literature on the weeds’ arbuscular–mycorrhizae (AM) interaction and we analyzed evidence on the: (i) AM suppressive/selective effect on weed communities; (ii) effect of weeds on AM colonization, and (iii) positive role of AM-supporting weeds on forming shared mycorrhizal hyphal connections in agroecosystems. While some authors conceptualized AM as a weed control tool, others underlined their selective effect on weed communities. Recent studies suggest that AM-host weeds can participate in the development of a common mycorrhizal mycelial network (MMN) among different plants species. Nevertheless, direct evidence of the actual exchange of nutrients and C between coexisting plants through MMN in agroecosystems is missing. Although the effect of agricultural practices on plant community-AM interactions are complex, more conservative farming management seems to foster AM populations. Future studies should focus on: (i) field studies, (ii) weed communities and their traits, rather than on the most abundant species, and (iii) the use of advanced analytical techniques, able to monitor MMN development and functionality. MDPI 2023-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9967897/ /pubmed/36838299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020334 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Trinchera, Alessandra
Warren Raffa, Dylan
Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title_full Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title_fullStr Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title_full_unstemmed Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title_short Weeds: An Insidious Enemy or a Tool to Boost Mycorrhization in Cropping Systems?
title_sort weeds: an insidious enemy or a tool to boost mycorrhization in cropping systems?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9967897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020334
work_keys_str_mv AT trincheraalessandra weedsaninsidiousenemyoratooltoboostmycorrhizationincroppingsystems
AT warrenraffadylan weedsaninsidiousenemyoratooltoboostmycorrhizationincroppingsystems