Cargando…

Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant

Background: The aim was to evaluate predictive value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEXi). Methods: OCT and OCTA parameters were collected: central macular thickness (CMT), vitre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costanzo, Eliana, Giannini, Daniela, De Geronimo, Daniele, Fragiotta, Serena, Varano, Monica, Parravano, Mariacristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041303
_version_ 1784897449211461632
author Costanzo, Eliana
Giannini, Daniela
De Geronimo, Daniele
Fragiotta, Serena
Varano, Monica
Parravano, Mariacristina
author_facet Costanzo, Eliana
Giannini, Daniela
De Geronimo, Daniele
Fragiotta, Serena
Varano, Monica
Parravano, Mariacristina
author_sort Costanzo, Eliana
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim was to evaluate predictive value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEXi). Methods: OCT and OCTA parameters were collected: central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular abnormalities (VMIAs), intraretinal and subretinal fluid (mixed DME pattern), hyper-reflective foci (HRF), microaneurysms (MAs) reflectivity, ellipsoid zone disruption, suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM), perfusion density (PD), vessel length density, and foveal avascular zone. Responders’ (RES) and non-responders’ (n-RES) eyes were classified considering morphological (CMT reduction ≥ 10%) and functional (BCVA change ≥ 5 ETDRS letters) changes after DEXi. Binary logistic regression OCT, OCTA, and OCT/OCTA-based models were developed. Results: Thirty-four DME eyes were enrolled (18 treatment-naïve). OCT-based model combining DME mixed pattern + MAs + HRF and OCTA-based model combining SSPiM and PD showed the best performance to correctly classify the morphological RES eyes. In the treatment-naïve eyes, VMIAs were included with a perfect fit for n-RES eyes. Conclusion: The presence of DME mixed pattern, a high number of parafoveal HRF, hyper-reflective MAs, SSPiM in the outer nuclear layers, and high PD represent baseline predictive biomarkers for DEXi treatment responsiveness. The application of these models to treatment-naïve patients allowed a good identification of n-RES eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9968175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99681752023-02-27 Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Costanzo, Eliana Giannini, Daniela De Geronimo, Daniele Fragiotta, Serena Varano, Monica Parravano, Mariacristina J Clin Med Article Background: The aim was to evaluate predictive value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEXi). Methods: OCT and OCTA parameters were collected: central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular abnormalities (VMIAs), intraretinal and subretinal fluid (mixed DME pattern), hyper-reflective foci (HRF), microaneurysms (MAs) reflectivity, ellipsoid zone disruption, suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM), perfusion density (PD), vessel length density, and foveal avascular zone. Responders’ (RES) and non-responders’ (n-RES) eyes were classified considering morphological (CMT reduction ≥ 10%) and functional (BCVA change ≥ 5 ETDRS letters) changes after DEXi. Binary logistic regression OCT, OCTA, and OCT/OCTA-based models were developed. Results: Thirty-four DME eyes were enrolled (18 treatment-naïve). OCT-based model combining DME mixed pattern + MAs + HRF and OCTA-based model combining SSPiM and PD showed the best performance to correctly classify the morphological RES eyes. In the treatment-naïve eyes, VMIAs were included with a perfect fit for n-RES eyes. Conclusion: The presence of DME mixed pattern, a high number of parafoveal HRF, hyper-reflective MAs, SSPiM in the outer nuclear layers, and high PD represent baseline predictive biomarkers for DEXi treatment responsiveness. The application of these models to treatment-naïve patients allowed a good identification of n-RES eyes. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9968175/ /pubmed/36835839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041303 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Costanzo, Eliana
Giannini, Daniela
De Geronimo, Daniele
Fragiotta, Serena
Varano, Monica
Parravano, Mariacristina
Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title_full Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title_fullStr Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title_short Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant
title_sort prognostic imaging biomarkers in diabetic macular edema eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041303
work_keys_str_mv AT costanzoeliana prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant
AT gianninidaniela prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant
AT degeronimodaniele prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant
AT fragiottaserena prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant
AT varanomonica prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant
AT parravanomariacristina prognosticimagingbiomarkersindiabeticmacularedemaeyestreatedwithintravitrealdexamethasoneimplant