Cargando…

Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers

This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Vidar, Hermans, Espen, Vereide, Vegard, Stien, Nicolay, Paulsen, Gøran, Baláš, Jiří, Michailov, Michail Lubomirov, Pedersen, Helene, Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36841900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x
_version_ 1784897477455904768
author Andersen, Vidar
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard
Stien, Nicolay
Paulsen, Gøran
Baláš, Jiří
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Pedersen, Helene
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_facet Andersen, Vidar
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard
Stien, Nicolay
Paulsen, Gøran
Baláš, Jiří
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Pedersen, Helene
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_sort Andersen, Vidar
collection PubMed
description This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018–0.022, ES = 1.01–1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132–0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88–2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04–1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9968301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99683012023-02-27 Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers Andersen, Vidar Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Stien, Nicolay Paulsen, Gøran Baláš, Jiří Michailov, Michail Lubomirov Pedersen, Helene Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Sci Rep Article This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018–0.022, ES = 1.01–1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132–0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88–2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04–1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9968301/ /pubmed/36841900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Andersen, Vidar
Hermans, Espen
Vereide, Vegard
Stien, Nicolay
Paulsen, Gøran
Baláš, Jiří
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Pedersen, Helene
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title_full Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title_fullStr Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title_short Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
title_sort comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36841900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenvidar comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT hermansespen comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT vereidevegard comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT stiennicolay comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT paulsengøran comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT balasjiri comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT michailovmichaillubomirov comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT pedersenhelene comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers
AT saeterbakkenatlehole comparisonoffingerflexorresistancetrainingwithandwithoutbloodflowrestrictiononperceptionalandphysiologicalresponsesinadvancedclimbers