Cargando…
Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184 |
_version_ | 1784897530406895616 |
---|---|
author | Kaufman, Jessica Bagot, Kathleen L. Tuckerman, Jane Biezen, Ruby Oliver, Jane Jos, Carol Ong, Darren Suryawijaya Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne Seale, Holly Sanci, Lena Munro, Jane Bell, J. Simon Leask, Julie Danchin, Margie |
author_facet | Kaufman, Jessica Bagot, Kathleen L. Tuckerman, Jane Biezen, Ruby Oliver, Jane Jos, Carol Ong, Darren Suryawijaya Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne Seale, Holly Sanci, Lena Munro, Jane Bell, J. Simon Leask, Julie Danchin, Margie |
author_sort | Kaufman, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative study in Victoria, Australia (February‐May 2021), we purposively sampled hesitant adults who were health or aged/disability care workers (n=20), or adults aged 18‐69 with comorbidities or aged ≥70 years (‘prioritised adults’; n=19). We thematically analysed interviews inductively, then deductively organised themes within the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers of vaccination model. Two stakeholder workshops (n=12) explored understanding and preferences for communicating risks and benefits. We subsequently formed communication recommendations. RESULTS: Prioritised adults and health and aged care workers had short‐ and long‐term safety concerns specific to personal circumstances, and felt like “guinea pigs”. They saw vaccination as beneficial for individual and community protection and travel. Some health and aged care workers felt insufficiently informed to recommend vaccines, or viewed this as outside their scope of practice. Workshop participants requested interactive materials and transparency from spokespeople about uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Eleven recommendations address communication content, delivery and context to increase uptake and acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9968588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99685882023-02-27 Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia Kaufman, Jessica Bagot, Kathleen L. Tuckerman, Jane Biezen, Ruby Oliver, Jane Jos, Carol Ong, Darren Suryawijaya Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne Seale, Holly Sanci, Lena Munro, Jane Bell, J. Simon Leask, Julie Danchin, Margie Aust N Z J Public Health Covid‐19 OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative study in Victoria, Australia (February‐May 2021), we purposively sampled hesitant adults who were health or aged/disability care workers (n=20), or adults aged 18‐69 with comorbidities or aged ≥70 years (‘prioritised adults’; n=19). We thematically analysed interviews inductively, then deductively organised themes within the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers of vaccination model. Two stakeholder workshops (n=12) explored understanding and preferences for communicating risks and benefits. We subsequently formed communication recommendations. RESULTS: Prioritised adults and health and aged care workers had short‐ and long‐term safety concerns specific to personal circumstances, and felt like “guinea pigs”. They saw vaccination as beneficial for individual and community protection and travel. Some health and aged care workers felt insufficiently informed to recommend vaccines, or viewed this as outside their scope of practice. Workshop participants requested interactive materials and transparency from spokespeople about uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Eleven recommendations address communication content, delivery and context to increase uptake and acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccines. Elsevier 2022-02 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9968588/ /pubmed/34897909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184 Text en © 2021 Copyright 2021 THE AUTHORS. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Covid‐19 Kaufman, Jessica Bagot, Kathleen L. Tuckerman, Jane Biezen, Ruby Oliver, Jane Jos, Carol Ong, Darren Suryawijaya Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne Seale, Holly Sanci, Lena Munro, Jane Bell, J. Simon Leask, Julie Danchin, Margie Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title | Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title_full | Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title_fullStr | Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title_short | Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia |
title_sort | qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive covid‐19 vaccines in australia |
topic | Covid‐19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaufmanjessica qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT bagotkathleenl qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT tuckermanjane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT biezenruby qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT oliverjane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT joscarol qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT ongdarrensuryawijaya qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT manskinankervisjoanne qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT sealeholly qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT sancilena qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT munrojane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT belljsimon qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT leaskjulie qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia AT danchinmargie qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia |