Cargando…

Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia

OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Jessica, Bagot, Kathleen L., Tuckerman, Jane, Biezen, Ruby, Oliver, Jane, Jos, Carol, Ong, Darren Suryawijaya, Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne, Seale, Holly, Sanci, Lena, Munro, Jane, Bell, J. Simon, Leask, Julie, Danchin, Margie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184
_version_ 1784897530406895616
author Kaufman, Jessica
Bagot, Kathleen L.
Tuckerman, Jane
Biezen, Ruby
Oliver, Jane
Jos, Carol
Ong, Darren Suryawijaya
Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne
Seale, Holly
Sanci, Lena
Munro, Jane
Bell, J. Simon
Leask, Julie
Danchin, Margie
author_facet Kaufman, Jessica
Bagot, Kathleen L.
Tuckerman, Jane
Biezen, Ruby
Oliver, Jane
Jos, Carol
Ong, Darren Suryawijaya
Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne
Seale, Holly
Sanci, Lena
Munro, Jane
Bell, J. Simon
Leask, Julie
Danchin, Margie
author_sort Kaufman, Jessica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative study in Victoria, Australia (February‐May 2021), we purposively sampled hesitant adults who were health or aged/disability care workers (n=20), or adults aged 18‐69 with comorbidities or aged ≥70 years (‘prioritised adults’; n=19). We thematically analysed interviews inductively, then deductively organised themes within the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers of vaccination model. Two stakeholder workshops (n=12) explored understanding and preferences for communicating risks and benefits. We subsequently formed communication recommendations. RESULTS: Prioritised adults and health and aged care workers had short‐ and long‐term safety concerns specific to personal circumstances, and felt like “guinea pigs”. They saw vaccination as beneficial for individual and community protection and travel. Some health and aged care workers felt insufficiently informed to recommend vaccines, or viewed this as outside their scope of practice. Workshop participants requested interactive materials and transparency from spokespeople about uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Eleven recommendations address communication content, delivery and context to increase uptake and acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9968588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99685882023-02-27 Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia Kaufman, Jessica Bagot, Kathleen L. Tuckerman, Jane Biezen, Ruby Oliver, Jane Jos, Carol Ong, Darren Suryawijaya Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne Seale, Holly Sanci, Lena Munro, Jane Bell, J. Simon Leask, Julie Danchin, Margie Aust N Z J Public Health Covid‐19 OBJECTIVE: Tailored communication is necessary to address COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy and increase uptake. We aimed to understand the information needs, perceived benefits and barriers to COVID‐19 vaccination of people prioritised, but hesitant to receive the vaccine. METHOD: In this qualitative study in Victoria, Australia (February‐May 2021), we purposively sampled hesitant adults who were health or aged/disability care workers (n=20), or adults aged 18‐69 with comorbidities or aged ≥70 years (‘prioritised adults’; n=19). We thematically analysed interviews inductively, then deductively organised themes within the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers of vaccination model. Two stakeholder workshops (n=12) explored understanding and preferences for communicating risks and benefits. We subsequently formed communication recommendations. RESULTS: Prioritised adults and health and aged care workers had short‐ and long‐term safety concerns specific to personal circumstances, and felt like “guinea pigs”. They saw vaccination as beneficial for individual and community protection and travel. Some health and aged care workers felt insufficiently informed to recommend vaccines, or viewed this as outside their scope of practice. Workshop participants requested interactive materials and transparency from spokespeople about uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Eleven recommendations address communication content, delivery and context to increase uptake and acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccines. Elsevier 2022-02 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9968588/ /pubmed/34897909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184 Text en © 2021 Copyright 2021 THE AUTHORS. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Covid‐19
Kaufman, Jessica
Bagot, Kathleen L.
Tuckerman, Jane
Biezen, Ruby
Oliver, Jane
Jos, Carol
Ong, Darren Suryawijaya
Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne
Seale, Holly
Sanci, Lena
Munro, Jane
Bell, J. Simon
Leask, Julie
Danchin, Margie
Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title_full Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title_fullStr Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title_short Qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive COVID‐19 vaccines in Australia
title_sort qualitative exploration of intentions, concerns and information needs of vaccine‐hesitant adults initially prioritised to receive covid‐19 vaccines in australia
topic Covid‐19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13184
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanjessica qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT bagotkathleenl qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT tuckermanjane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT biezenruby qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT oliverjane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT joscarol qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT ongdarrensuryawijaya qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT manskinankervisjoanne qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT sealeholly qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT sancilena qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT munrojane qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT belljsimon qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT leaskjulie qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia
AT danchinmargie qualitativeexplorationofintentionsconcernsandinformationneedsofvaccinehesitantadultsinitiallyprioritisedtoreceivecovid19vaccinesinaustralia