Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: The combination of antiangiogenic agents with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) and chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs are the most common combination treatment options in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This network met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Jiali, Liu, Xinyin, Li, Jun, Qu, Tianyu, Cui, Yanan, Jin, Shidai, Zhang, Erbao, Guo, Renhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36594109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14783
_version_ 1784897533481320448
author Dai, Jiali
Liu, Xinyin
Li, Jun
Qu, Tianyu
Cui, Yanan
Jin, Shidai
Zhang, Erbao
Guo, Renhua
author_facet Dai, Jiali
Liu, Xinyin
Li, Jun
Qu, Tianyu
Cui, Yanan
Jin, Shidai
Zhang, Erbao
Guo, Renhua
author_sort Dai, Jiali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of antiangiogenic agents with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) and chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs are the most common combination treatment options in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This network meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate the differences between them. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to August 2022. The primary outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). The data of hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted in the studies. A network meta‐analysis (NMA) was used to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents plus EGFR‐TKIs and chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs. RESULTS: Pooled data of included studies were demonstrated that chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs had a benefit in ORR compared to antiangiogenic agents plus EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0–1.2). However, there were no significant differences in PFS, OS and DCR between in the two group (PFS: HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.74–1.6; OS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45–1.5; DCR: RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.94–1.1). The common treatment‐related AEs in the two groups were relatively manageable. CONCLUSION: Based on the efficacy and safety, the combination of chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs is considered the best combination treatment options in advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9968601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99686012023-02-28 Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis Dai, Jiali Liu, Xinyin Li, Jun Qu, Tianyu Cui, Yanan Jin, Shidai Zhang, Erbao Guo, Renhua Thorac Cancer Review BACKGROUND: The combination of antiangiogenic agents with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) and chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs are the most common combination treatment options in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This network meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate the differences between them. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to August 2022. The primary outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). The data of hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted in the studies. A network meta‐analysis (NMA) was used to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents plus EGFR‐TKIs and chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs. RESULTS: Pooled data of included studies were demonstrated that chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs had a benefit in ORR compared to antiangiogenic agents plus EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0–1.2). However, there were no significant differences in PFS, OS and DCR between in the two group (PFS: HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.74–1.6; OS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45–1.5; DCR: RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.94–1.1). The common treatment‐related AEs in the two groups were relatively manageable. CONCLUSION: Based on the efficacy and safety, the combination of chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs is considered the best combination treatment options in advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9968601/ /pubmed/36594109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14783 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Dai, Jiali
Liu, Xinyin
Li, Jun
Qu, Tianyu
Cui, Yanan
Jin, Shidai
Zhang, Erbao
Guo, Renhua
Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR‐TKIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus egfr‐tkis in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36594109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14783
work_keys_str_mv AT daijiali efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuxinyin efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lijun efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT qutianyu efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT cuiyanan efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jinshidai efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangerbao efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT guorenhua efficacyandsafetyofantiangiogenicagentsorchemotherapyplusegfrtkisinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis