Cargando…
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x |
_version_ | 1784897629538222080 |
---|---|
author | Lühnen, Julia Frese, Thomas Mau, Wilfried Meyer, Gabriele Mikolajczyk, Rafael Richter, Matthias Schildmann, Jan Braunisch, Matthias C. Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Popp, Maria Schaaf, Christian Schmaderer, Christoph Seeber, Christian Werner, Anne Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Meerpohl, Joerg J. Steckelberg, Anke |
author_facet | Lühnen, Julia Frese, Thomas Mau, Wilfried Meyer, Gabriele Mikolajczyk, Rafael Richter, Matthias Schildmann, Jan Braunisch, Matthias C. Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Popp, Maria Schaaf, Christian Schmaderer, Christoph Seeber, Christian Werner, Anne Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Meerpohl, Joerg J. Steckelberg, Anke |
author_sort | Lühnen, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). CONCLUSIONS: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9969022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99690222023-02-28 Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study Lühnen, Julia Frese, Thomas Mau, Wilfried Meyer, Gabriele Mikolajczyk, Rafael Richter, Matthias Schildmann, Jan Braunisch, Matthias C. Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Popp, Maria Schaaf, Christian Schmaderer, Christoph Seeber, Christian Werner, Anne Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Meerpohl, Joerg J. Steckelberg, Anke BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). CONCLUSIONS: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x. BioMed Central 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9969022/ /pubmed/36849938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lühnen, Julia Frese, Thomas Mau, Wilfried Meyer, Gabriele Mikolajczyk, Rafael Richter, Matthias Schildmann, Jan Braunisch, Matthias C. Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Popp, Maria Schaaf, Christian Schmaderer, Christoph Seeber, Christian Werner, Anne Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Meerpohl, Joerg J. Steckelberg, Anke Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title | Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | public information needs and preferences on covid-19: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luhnenjulia publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT fresethomas publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT mauwilfried publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT meyergabriele publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT mikolajczykrafael publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT richtermatthias publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT schildmannjan publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT braunischmatthiasc publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT fichtnerfalk publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT holzmannlittigchristopher publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT krankepeter publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT poppmaria publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT schaafchristian publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT schmadererchristoph publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT seeberchristian publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT werneranne publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT wijnenmeijermarjo publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT meerpohljoergj publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT steckelberganke publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy AT publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy |