Cargando…

Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lühnen, Julia, Frese, Thomas, Mau, Wilfried, Meyer, Gabriele, Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Richter, Matthias, Schildmann, Jan, Braunisch, Matthias C., Fichtner, Falk, Holzmann-Littig, Christopher, Kranke, Peter, Popp, Maria, Schaaf, Christian, Schmaderer, Christoph, Seeber, Christian, Werner, Anne, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, Meerpohl, Joerg J., Steckelberg, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x
_version_ 1784897629538222080
author Lühnen, Julia
Frese, Thomas
Mau, Wilfried
Meyer, Gabriele
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Richter, Matthias
Schildmann, Jan
Braunisch, Matthias C.
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Popp, Maria
Schaaf, Christian
Schmaderer, Christoph
Seeber, Christian
Werner, Anne
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Steckelberg, Anke
author_facet Lühnen, Julia
Frese, Thomas
Mau, Wilfried
Meyer, Gabriele
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Richter, Matthias
Schildmann, Jan
Braunisch, Matthias C.
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Popp, Maria
Schaaf, Christian
Schmaderer, Christoph
Seeber, Christian
Werner, Anne
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Steckelberg, Anke
author_sort Lühnen, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). CONCLUSIONS: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9969022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99690222023-02-28 Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study Lühnen, Julia Frese, Thomas Mau, Wilfried Meyer, Gabriele Mikolajczyk, Rafael Richter, Matthias Schildmann, Jan Braunisch, Matthias C. Fichtner, Falk Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Kranke, Peter Popp, Maria Schaaf, Christian Schmaderer, Christoph Seeber, Christian Werner, Anne Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Meerpohl, Joerg J. Steckelberg, Anke BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). CONCLUSIONS: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x. BioMed Central 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9969022/ /pubmed/36849938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lühnen, Julia
Frese, Thomas
Mau, Wilfried
Meyer, Gabriele
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Richter, Matthias
Schildmann, Jan
Braunisch, Matthias C.
Fichtner, Falk
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Kranke, Peter
Popp, Maria
Schaaf, Christian
Schmaderer, Christoph
Seeber, Christian
Werner, Anne
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Steckelberg, Anke
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title_full Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title_short Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
title_sort public information needs and preferences on covid-19: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x
work_keys_str_mv AT luhnenjulia publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT fresethomas publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT mauwilfried publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT meyergabriele publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT mikolajczykrafael publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT richtermatthias publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT schildmannjan publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT braunischmatthiasc publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT fichtnerfalk publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT holzmannlittigchristopher publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT krankepeter publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT poppmaria publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT schaafchristian publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT schmadererchristoph publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT seeberchristian publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT werneranne publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT wijnenmeijermarjo publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT meerpohljoergj publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT steckelberganke publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy
AT publicinformationneedsandpreferencesoncovid19acrosssectionalstudy