Cargando…

Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study

Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis, Arce-Alvarez, Alexis, Salazar-Ardiles, Camila, Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo, Alvarez, Cristian, Toledo, Camilo, Izquierdo, Mikel, Andrade, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829
_version_ 1784897644604162048
author Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis
Arce-Alvarez, Alexis
Salazar-Ardiles, Camila
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Alvarez, Cristian
Toledo, Camilo
Izquierdo, Mikel
Andrade, David C.
author_facet Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis
Arce-Alvarez, Alexis
Salazar-Ardiles, Camila
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Alvarez, Cristian
Toledo, Camilo
Izquierdo, Mikel
Andrade, David C.
author_sort Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you cannot be confident of the security because near-competition, off-season, among other). COP’s physiological components have not been wholly described yet. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the determinants of COP in highly trained athletes and its influence on maximum and sub-maximum variables during CPET through principal c omponent analysis (PCA) (explains the dataset’s variance). Methods: Female (n = 9; age, 17.4 ± 3.1 y; maximal VO2 [VO2max]), 46.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min) and male (n = 24; age, 19.7 ± 4.0 y; VO2max, 56.1 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min) athletes performed a CPET to determine the COP, ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), and VO2max. The PCA was used to determine the relationship between variables and COP, explaining their variance. Results: Our data revealed that females and males displayed different COP values. Indeed, males showed a significant diminished COP compared to the female group (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 27.2 ±3.4 VE/VO2, respectively); nevertheless, COP was allocated before VT1 in both groups. Discussion: PC analysis revealed that the COP variance was mainly explained (75.6%) by PC1 (expired CO(2) at VO2max) and PC2 (VE at VT2), possibly influencing cardiorespiratory efficiency at VO2max and VT2. Our data suggest that COP could be used as a submaximal index to monitor and assess cardiorespiratory system efficiency in endurance athletes. The COP could be particularly useful during the offseason and competitive periods and the return to the sports continuum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9969083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99690832023-02-28 Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis Arce-Alvarez, Alexis Salazar-Ardiles, Camila Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Alvarez, Cristian Toledo, Camilo Izquierdo, Mikel Andrade, David C. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you cannot be confident of the security because near-competition, off-season, among other). COP’s physiological components have not been wholly described yet. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the determinants of COP in highly trained athletes and its influence on maximum and sub-maximum variables during CPET through principal c omponent analysis (PCA) (explains the dataset’s variance). Methods: Female (n = 9; age, 17.4 ± 3.1 y; maximal VO2 [VO2max]), 46.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min) and male (n = 24; age, 19.7 ± 4.0 y; VO2max, 56.1 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min) athletes performed a CPET to determine the COP, ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), and VO2max. The PCA was used to determine the relationship between variables and COP, explaining their variance. Results: Our data revealed that females and males displayed different COP values. Indeed, males showed a significant diminished COP compared to the female group (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 27.2 ±3.4 VE/VO2, respectively); nevertheless, COP was allocated before VT1 in both groups. Discussion: PC analysis revealed that the COP variance was mainly explained (75.6%) by PC1 (expired CO(2) at VO2max) and PC2 (VE at VT2), possibly influencing cardiorespiratory efficiency at VO2max and VT2. Our data suggest that COP could be used as a submaximal index to monitor and assess cardiorespiratory system efficiency in endurance athletes. The COP could be particularly useful during the offseason and competitive periods and the return to the sports continuum. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9969083/ /pubmed/36860520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829 Text en Copyright © 2023 Oyarzo-Aravena, Arce-Alvarez, Salazar-Ardiles, Ramirez-Campillo, Alvarez, Toledo, Izquierdo and Andrade. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis
Arce-Alvarez, Alexis
Salazar-Ardiles, Camila
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Alvarez, Cristian
Toledo, Camilo
Izquierdo, Mikel
Andrade, David C.
Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title_full Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title_fullStr Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title_short Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
title_sort cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: an exploratory study
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829
work_keys_str_mv AT oyarzoaravenaalexis cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT arcealvarezalexis cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT salazarardilescamila cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT ramirezcampillorodrigo cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT alvarezcristian cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT toledocamilo cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT izquierdomikel cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy
AT andradedavidc cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy