Cargando…
Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study
Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829 |
_version_ | 1784897644604162048 |
---|---|
author | Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis Arce-Alvarez, Alexis Salazar-Ardiles, Camila Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Alvarez, Cristian Toledo, Camilo Izquierdo, Mikel Andrade, David C. |
author_facet | Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis Arce-Alvarez, Alexis Salazar-Ardiles, Camila Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Alvarez, Cristian Toledo, Camilo Izquierdo, Mikel Andrade, David C. |
author_sort | Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you cannot be confident of the security because near-competition, off-season, among other). COP’s physiological components have not been wholly described yet. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the determinants of COP in highly trained athletes and its influence on maximum and sub-maximum variables during CPET through principal c omponent analysis (PCA) (explains the dataset’s variance). Methods: Female (n = 9; age, 17.4 ± 3.1 y; maximal VO2 [VO2max]), 46.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min) and male (n = 24; age, 19.7 ± 4.0 y; VO2max, 56.1 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min) athletes performed a CPET to determine the COP, ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), and VO2max. The PCA was used to determine the relationship between variables and COP, explaining their variance. Results: Our data revealed that females and males displayed different COP values. Indeed, males showed a significant diminished COP compared to the female group (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 27.2 ±3.4 VE/VO2, respectively); nevertheless, COP was allocated before VT1 in both groups. Discussion: PC analysis revealed that the COP variance was mainly explained (75.6%) by PC1 (expired CO(2) at VO2max) and PC2 (VE at VT2), possibly influencing cardiorespiratory efficiency at VO2max and VT2. Our data suggest that COP could be used as a submaximal index to monitor and assess cardiorespiratory system efficiency in endurance athletes. The COP could be particularly useful during the offseason and competitive periods and the return to the sports continuum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9969083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99690832023-02-28 Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis Arce-Alvarez, Alexis Salazar-Ardiles, Camila Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Alvarez, Cristian Toledo, Camilo Izquierdo, Mikel Andrade, David C. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) represents the lowest minute ventilation to oxygen consumption ratio (VE/VO2) and can be estimated during a CPET at submaximal intensity when an exercise test until volitional fatigue is not always advisable (i.e., a conflict zone where you cannot be confident of the security because near-competition, off-season, among other). COP’s physiological components have not been wholly described yet. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the determinants of COP in highly trained athletes and its influence on maximum and sub-maximum variables during CPET through principal c omponent analysis (PCA) (explains the dataset’s variance). Methods: Female (n = 9; age, 17.4 ± 3.1 y; maximal VO2 [VO2max]), 46.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min) and male (n = 24; age, 19.7 ± 4.0 y; VO2max, 56.1 ± 7.6 mL/kg/min) athletes performed a CPET to determine the COP, ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), and VO2max. The PCA was used to determine the relationship between variables and COP, explaining their variance. Results: Our data revealed that females and males displayed different COP values. Indeed, males showed a significant diminished COP compared to the female group (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 27.2 ±3.4 VE/VO2, respectively); nevertheless, COP was allocated before VT1 in both groups. Discussion: PC analysis revealed that the COP variance was mainly explained (75.6%) by PC1 (expired CO(2) at VO2max) and PC2 (VE at VT2), possibly influencing cardiorespiratory efficiency at VO2max and VT2. Our data suggest that COP could be used as a submaximal index to monitor and assess cardiorespiratory system efficiency in endurance athletes. The COP could be particularly useful during the offseason and competitive periods and the return to the sports continuum. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9969083/ /pubmed/36860520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829 Text en Copyright © 2023 Oyarzo-Aravena, Arce-Alvarez, Salazar-Ardiles, Ramirez-Campillo, Alvarez, Toledo, Izquierdo and Andrade. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Oyarzo-Aravena, Alexis Arce-Alvarez, Alexis Salazar-Ardiles, Camila Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo Alvarez, Cristian Toledo, Camilo Izquierdo, Mikel Andrade, David C. Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title | Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title_full | Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title_fullStr | Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title_short | Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study |
title_sort | cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: an exploratory study |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1087829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oyarzoaravenaalexis cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT arcealvarezalexis cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT salazarardilescamila cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT ramirezcampillorodrigo cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT alvarezcristian cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT toledocamilo cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT izquierdomikel cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy AT andradedavidc cardiorespiratoryoptimalpointasasubmaximalevaluationtoolinenduranceathletesanexploratorystudy |