Cargando…

Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?

BACKGROUND: Functional hallux limitus (FHLim) refers to a limitation of hallux dorsiflexion when the first metatarsal head is under load, whereas physiologic dorsiflexion is measured in the unloaded condition. Limited excursion of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) in the retrotalar pulley has been id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam, Reymond, Nils, Rybnikov, Alexey, Dubois-Ferriere, Victor, Assal, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231153140
_version_ 1784897729993900032
author Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam
Reymond, Nils
Rybnikov, Alexey
Dubois-Ferriere, Victor
Assal, Mathieu
author_facet Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam
Reymond, Nils
Rybnikov, Alexey
Dubois-Ferriere, Victor
Assal, Mathieu
author_sort Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional hallux limitus (FHLim) refers to a limitation of hallux dorsiflexion when the first metatarsal head is under load, whereas physiologic dorsiflexion is measured in the unloaded condition. Limited excursion of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) in the retrotalar pulley has been identified as a possible cause of FHLim. A low-lying or bulky FHL muscle belly could be the cause of this limitation. However, to date, there are no published data regarding the association between clinical and anatomical findings. The purpose of this anatomical study is to correlate the presence of FHLim and objective morphologic findings through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Twenty-six patients (27 feet) were included in this observational study. They were divided into 2 groups, based on positive and negative Stretch Tests. In both groups, we measured on MRI the distance from the most inferior part of the FHL muscle belly and the retrotalar pulley as well as the cross-sectional area of the muscle belly 20, 30, and 40 mm proximal to the retrotalar pulley. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had a positive Stretch Test and 9 patients had a negative Stretch Test. The mean distance between the most inferior part of the FHL muscle belly and the retrotalar pulley was 6.0 ± 6.4 mm for the positive group and 11.8 ± 9.4 mm for the negative group (P = .039). The mean cross section of the muscle measured at 20, 30, and 40 mm from the pulley were 190 ± 90, 300 ± 112, and 395 ± 123 mm(2) for the positive group and 98 ± 44, 206 ± 72, and 294 ± 61mm(2) for the negative group (P values .005, .019, and .017). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we can conclude that patients with FHLim do have a low-lying FHL muscle belly causing limited excursion in the retrotalar pulley. However, the mean volume of the muscle belly was comparable in both groups, and therefore bulkiness was not found to be a contributing factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, observational study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9969446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99694462023-02-28 Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly? Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam Reymond, Nils Rybnikov, Alexey Dubois-Ferriere, Victor Assal, Mathieu Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: Functional hallux limitus (FHLim) refers to a limitation of hallux dorsiflexion when the first metatarsal head is under load, whereas physiologic dorsiflexion is measured in the unloaded condition. Limited excursion of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) in the retrotalar pulley has been identified as a possible cause of FHLim. A low-lying or bulky FHL muscle belly could be the cause of this limitation. However, to date, there are no published data regarding the association between clinical and anatomical findings. The purpose of this anatomical study is to correlate the presence of FHLim and objective morphologic findings through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Twenty-six patients (27 feet) were included in this observational study. They were divided into 2 groups, based on positive and negative Stretch Tests. In both groups, we measured on MRI the distance from the most inferior part of the FHL muscle belly and the retrotalar pulley as well as the cross-sectional area of the muscle belly 20, 30, and 40 mm proximal to the retrotalar pulley. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had a positive Stretch Test and 9 patients had a negative Stretch Test. The mean distance between the most inferior part of the FHL muscle belly and the retrotalar pulley was 6.0 ± 6.4 mm for the positive group and 11.8 ± 9.4 mm for the negative group (P = .039). The mean cross section of the muscle measured at 20, 30, and 40 mm from the pulley were 190 ± 90, 300 ± 112, and 395 ± 123 mm(2) for the positive group and 98 ± 44, 206 ± 72, and 294 ± 61mm(2) for the negative group (P values .005, .019, and .017). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we can conclude that patients with FHLim do have a low-lying FHL muscle belly causing limited excursion in the retrotalar pulley. However, the mean volume of the muscle belly was comparable in both groups, and therefore bulkiness was not found to be a contributing factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, observational study. SAGE Publications 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9969446/ /pubmed/36860802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231153140 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Sockalingam, Navindravadhanam
Reymond, Nils
Rybnikov, Alexey
Dubois-Ferriere, Victor
Assal, Mathieu
Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title_full Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title_fullStr Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title_full_unstemmed Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title_short Do Patients With Functional Hallux Limitus Have a Low-Lying or Bulky FHL Muscle Belly?
title_sort do patients with functional hallux limitus have a low-lying or bulky fhl muscle belly?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231153140
work_keys_str_mv AT sockalingamnavindravadhanam dopatientswithfunctionalhalluxlimitushavealowlyingorbulkyfhlmusclebelly
AT reymondnils dopatientswithfunctionalhalluxlimitushavealowlyingorbulkyfhlmusclebelly
AT rybnikovalexey dopatientswithfunctionalhalluxlimitushavealowlyingorbulkyfhlmusclebelly
AT duboisferrierevictor dopatientswithfunctionalhalluxlimitushavealowlyingorbulkyfhlmusclebelly
AT assalmathieu dopatientswithfunctionalhalluxlimitushavealowlyingorbulkyfhlmusclebelly