Cargando…

Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver

Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabir, Irteza Enan, Caban-Rivera, Diego A, Ormachea, Juvenal, Parker, Kevin J, Johnson, Curtis L, Doyley, Marvin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7
_version_ 1784897752943034368
author Kabir, Irteza Enan
Caban-Rivera, Diego A
Ormachea, Juvenal
Parker, Kevin J
Johnson, Curtis L
Doyley, Marvin M
author_facet Kabir, Irteza Enan
Caban-Rivera, Diego A
Ormachea, Juvenal
Parker, Kevin J
Johnson, Curtis L
Doyley, Marvin M
author_sort Kabir, Irteza Enan
collection PubMed
description Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance elastograms with a single mechanical driver. To corroborate this hypothesis, we performed studies on healthy volunteers (n = 3); and a constrained calibrated brain phantom containing spherical inclusions with diameters ranging from 4–18 mm. In both studies (i.e. phantom and clinical), imaging was performed at frequencies of 50 and 70 Hz. We used the accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio performance metrics to evaluate reverberant elastograms relative to those computed using the established subzone inversion method. Errors incurred in reverberant elastograms varied from 1.3% to 16.6% when imaging at 50 Hz and 3.1% and 16.8% when imaging at 70 Hz. In contrast, errors incurred in subzone elastograms ranged from 1.9% to 13% at 50 Hz and 3.6% to 14.9% at 70 Hz. The contrast-to-noise ratio of reverberant elastograms ranged from 63.1 to 73 dB compared to 65 to 66.2 dB for subzone elastograms. The average global brain shear modulus estimated from reverberant and subzone elastograms was 2.36 ± 0.07 kPa and 2.38 ± 0.11 kPa, respectively, when imaging at 50 Hz and 2.70 ± 0.20 kPa and 2.89 ± 0.60 kPa respectively, when imaging at 70 Hz. The results of this investigation demonstrate that reverberant elastography can produce accurate, high-quality elastograms of the brain with a single mechanical driver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9969521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99695212023-02-28 Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver Kabir, Irteza Enan Caban-Rivera, Diego A Ormachea, Juvenal Parker, Kevin J Johnson, Curtis L Doyley, Marvin M Phys Med Biol Paper Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance elastograms with a single mechanical driver. To corroborate this hypothesis, we performed studies on healthy volunteers (n = 3); and a constrained calibrated brain phantom containing spherical inclusions with diameters ranging from 4–18 mm. In both studies (i.e. phantom and clinical), imaging was performed at frequencies of 50 and 70 Hz. We used the accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio performance metrics to evaluate reverberant elastograms relative to those computed using the established subzone inversion method. Errors incurred in reverberant elastograms varied from 1.3% to 16.6% when imaging at 50 Hz and 3.1% and 16.8% when imaging at 70 Hz. In contrast, errors incurred in subzone elastograms ranged from 1.9% to 13% at 50 Hz and 3.6% to 14.9% at 70 Hz. The contrast-to-noise ratio of reverberant elastograms ranged from 63.1 to 73 dB compared to 65 to 66.2 dB for subzone elastograms. The average global brain shear modulus estimated from reverberant and subzone elastograms was 2.36 ± 0.07 kPa and 2.38 ± 0.11 kPa, respectively, when imaging at 50 Hz and 2.70 ± 0.20 kPa and 2.89 ± 0.60 kPa respectively, when imaging at 70 Hz. The results of this investigation demonstrate that reverberant elastography can produce accurate, high-quality elastograms of the brain with a single mechanical driver. IOP Publishing 2023-03-07 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9969521/ /pubmed/36780698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published on behalf of Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Paper
Kabir, Irteza Enan
Caban-Rivera, Diego A
Ormachea, Juvenal
Parker, Kevin J
Johnson, Curtis L
Doyley, Marvin M
Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title_full Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title_fullStr Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title_full_unstemmed Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title_short Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
title_sort reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7
work_keys_str_mv AT kabirirtezaenan reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver
AT cabanriveradiegoa reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver
AT ormacheajuvenal reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver
AT parkerkevinj reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver
AT johnsoncurtisl reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver
AT doyleymarvinm reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver