Cargando…
Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver
Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance el...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOP Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7 |
_version_ | 1784897752943034368 |
---|---|
author | Kabir, Irteza Enan Caban-Rivera, Diego A Ormachea, Juvenal Parker, Kevin J Johnson, Curtis L Doyley, Marvin M |
author_facet | Kabir, Irteza Enan Caban-Rivera, Diego A Ormachea, Juvenal Parker, Kevin J Johnson, Curtis L Doyley, Marvin M |
author_sort | Kabir, Irteza Enan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance elastograms with a single mechanical driver. To corroborate this hypothesis, we performed studies on healthy volunteers (n = 3); and a constrained calibrated brain phantom containing spherical inclusions with diameters ranging from 4–18 mm. In both studies (i.e. phantom and clinical), imaging was performed at frequencies of 50 and 70 Hz. We used the accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio performance metrics to evaluate reverberant elastograms relative to those computed using the established subzone inversion method. Errors incurred in reverberant elastograms varied from 1.3% to 16.6% when imaging at 50 Hz and 3.1% and 16.8% when imaging at 70 Hz. In contrast, errors incurred in subzone elastograms ranged from 1.9% to 13% at 50 Hz and 3.6% to 14.9% at 70 Hz. The contrast-to-noise ratio of reverberant elastograms ranged from 63.1 to 73 dB compared to 65 to 66.2 dB for subzone elastograms. The average global brain shear modulus estimated from reverberant and subzone elastograms was 2.36 ± 0.07 kPa and 2.38 ± 0.11 kPa, respectively, when imaging at 50 Hz and 2.70 ± 0.20 kPa and 2.89 ± 0.60 kPa respectively, when imaging at 70 Hz. The results of this investigation demonstrate that reverberant elastography can produce accurate, high-quality elastograms of the brain with a single mechanical driver. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9969521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | IOP Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99695212023-02-28 Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver Kabir, Irteza Enan Caban-Rivera, Diego A Ormachea, Juvenal Parker, Kevin J Johnson, Curtis L Doyley, Marvin M Phys Med Biol Paper Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance elastograms with a single mechanical driver. To corroborate this hypothesis, we performed studies on healthy volunteers (n = 3); and a constrained calibrated brain phantom containing spherical inclusions with diameters ranging from 4–18 mm. In both studies (i.e. phantom and clinical), imaging was performed at frequencies of 50 and 70 Hz. We used the accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio performance metrics to evaluate reverberant elastograms relative to those computed using the established subzone inversion method. Errors incurred in reverberant elastograms varied from 1.3% to 16.6% when imaging at 50 Hz and 3.1% and 16.8% when imaging at 70 Hz. In contrast, errors incurred in subzone elastograms ranged from 1.9% to 13% at 50 Hz and 3.6% to 14.9% at 70 Hz. The contrast-to-noise ratio of reverberant elastograms ranged from 63.1 to 73 dB compared to 65 to 66.2 dB for subzone elastograms. The average global brain shear modulus estimated from reverberant and subzone elastograms was 2.36 ± 0.07 kPa and 2.38 ± 0.11 kPa, respectively, when imaging at 50 Hz and 2.70 ± 0.20 kPa and 2.89 ± 0.60 kPa respectively, when imaging at 70 Hz. The results of this investigation demonstrate that reverberant elastography can produce accurate, high-quality elastograms of the brain with a single mechanical driver. IOP Publishing 2023-03-07 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9969521/ /pubmed/36780698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published on behalf of Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. |
spellingShingle | Paper Kabir, Irteza Enan Caban-Rivera, Diego A Ormachea, Juvenal Parker, Kevin J Johnson, Curtis L Doyley, Marvin M Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title | Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title_full | Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title_fullStr | Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title_full_unstemmed | Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title_short | Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
title_sort | reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kabirirtezaenan reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver AT cabanriveradiegoa reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver AT ormacheajuvenal reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver AT parkerkevinj reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver AT johnsoncurtisl reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver AT doyleymarvinm reverberantmagneticresonanceelastographicimagingusingasinglemechanicaldriver |