Cargando…

Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora, Anex, Adrien, Boegli, Monique, Bollondi Pauly, Catherine, Curtin, François, Luthy, Christophe, Desmeules, Jules, Cedraschi, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078
_version_ 1784897840957358080
author Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora
Anex, Adrien
Boegli, Monique
Bollondi Pauly, Catherine
Curtin, François
Luthy, Christophe
Desmeules, Jules
Cedraschi, Christine
author_facet Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora
Anex, Adrien
Boegli, Monique
Bollondi Pauly, Catherine
Curtin, François
Luthy, Christophe
Desmeules, Jules
Cedraschi, Christine
author_sort Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger research program aimed at investigating the impact of TM on the experiences of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two units of an internal medicine rehabilitation ward. Health care professionals (HCPs) were trained either to provide TM or to use of a massage-machine device according to their units. At the end of the trial, two focus groups were conducted with HCPs from each unit who took part in the training and agreed to discuss their experience: 10 caregivers from the TM group and 6 from the machine group. The focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from thematic content analysis: perceived impact on patients, HCPs’ affective and cognitive experiences, patient-professionals relationships, organizational tensions, and conceptual tensions. Overall, the HCPs reported better general outcomes with TM than with the machine. They described positive effects on patients, HCPs, and their relationships. Regarding interventions’ implementation, the HCPs reported organizational barriers such as patients’ case complexity, work overload, and lack of time. Conceptual barriers such as ambivalence around the legitimacy of TM in nursing care were reported. TM was often described as a pleasure care that was considered a complementary approach and was overlooked despite its perceived benefits. CONCLUSION: Despite the perceived benefits of TM reported by the HCPs, ambivalence arose around the legitimacy of this intervention. This result emphasizes the importance of changing HCPs’ attitudes regarding a given intervention to facilitate its implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9970055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99700552023-02-28 Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora Anex, Adrien Boegli, Monique Bollondi Pauly, Catherine Curtin, François Luthy, Christophe Desmeules, Jules Cedraschi, Christine PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger research program aimed at investigating the impact of TM on the experiences of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two units of an internal medicine rehabilitation ward. Health care professionals (HCPs) were trained either to provide TM or to use of a massage-machine device according to their units. At the end of the trial, two focus groups were conducted with HCPs from each unit who took part in the training and agreed to discuss their experience: 10 caregivers from the TM group and 6 from the machine group. The focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from thematic content analysis: perceived impact on patients, HCPs’ affective and cognitive experiences, patient-professionals relationships, organizational tensions, and conceptual tensions. Overall, the HCPs reported better general outcomes with TM than with the machine. They described positive effects on patients, HCPs, and their relationships. Regarding interventions’ implementation, the HCPs reported organizational barriers such as patients’ case complexity, work overload, and lack of time. Conceptual barriers such as ambivalence around the legitimacy of TM in nursing care were reported. TM was often described as a pleasure care that was considered a complementary approach and was overlooked despite its perceived benefits. CONCLUSION: Despite the perceived benefits of TM reported by the HCPs, ambivalence arose around the legitimacy of this intervention. This result emphasizes the importance of changing HCPs’ attitudes regarding a given intervention to facilitate its implementation. Public Library of Science 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9970055/ /pubmed/36848354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078 Text en © 2023 Da Rocha Rodrigues et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora
Anex, Adrien
Boegli, Monique
Bollondi Pauly, Catherine
Curtin, François
Luthy, Christophe
Desmeules, Jules
Cedraschi, Christine
Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title_full Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title_fullStr Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title_short Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
title_sort is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078
work_keys_str_mv AT darocharodriguesgora ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT anexadrien ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT boeglimonique ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT bollondipaulycatherine ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT curtinfrancois ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT luthychristophe ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT desmeulesjules ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy
AT cedraschichristine ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy