Cargando…
Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study
INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and fac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078 |
_version_ | 1784897840957358080 |
---|---|
author | Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora Anex, Adrien Boegli, Monique Bollondi Pauly, Catherine Curtin, François Luthy, Christophe Desmeules, Jules Cedraschi, Christine |
author_facet | Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora Anex, Adrien Boegli, Monique Bollondi Pauly, Catherine Curtin, François Luthy, Christophe Desmeules, Jules Cedraschi, Christine |
author_sort | Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger research program aimed at investigating the impact of TM on the experiences of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two units of an internal medicine rehabilitation ward. Health care professionals (HCPs) were trained either to provide TM or to use of a massage-machine device according to their units. At the end of the trial, two focus groups were conducted with HCPs from each unit who took part in the training and agreed to discuss their experience: 10 caregivers from the TM group and 6 from the machine group. The focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from thematic content analysis: perceived impact on patients, HCPs’ affective and cognitive experiences, patient-professionals relationships, organizational tensions, and conceptual tensions. Overall, the HCPs reported better general outcomes with TM than with the machine. They described positive effects on patients, HCPs, and their relationships. Regarding interventions’ implementation, the HCPs reported organizational barriers such as patients’ case complexity, work overload, and lack of time. Conceptual barriers such as ambivalence around the legitimacy of TM in nursing care were reported. TM was often described as a pleasure care that was considered a complementary approach and was overlooked despite its perceived benefits. CONCLUSION: Despite the perceived benefits of TM reported by the HCPs, ambivalence arose around the legitimacy of this intervention. This result emphasizes the importance of changing HCPs’ attitudes regarding a given intervention to facilitate its implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9970055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99700552023-02-28 Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora Anex, Adrien Boegli, Monique Bollondi Pauly, Catherine Curtin, François Luthy, Christophe Desmeules, Jules Cedraschi, Christine PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger research program aimed at investigating the impact of TM on the experiences of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two units of an internal medicine rehabilitation ward. Health care professionals (HCPs) were trained either to provide TM or to use of a massage-machine device according to their units. At the end of the trial, two focus groups were conducted with HCPs from each unit who took part in the training and agreed to discuss their experience: 10 caregivers from the TM group and 6 from the machine group. The focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from thematic content analysis: perceived impact on patients, HCPs’ affective and cognitive experiences, patient-professionals relationships, organizational tensions, and conceptual tensions. Overall, the HCPs reported better general outcomes with TM than with the machine. They described positive effects on patients, HCPs, and their relationships. Regarding interventions’ implementation, the HCPs reported organizational barriers such as patients’ case complexity, work overload, and lack of time. Conceptual barriers such as ambivalence around the legitimacy of TM in nursing care were reported. TM was often described as a pleasure care that was considered a complementary approach and was overlooked despite its perceived benefits. CONCLUSION: Despite the perceived benefits of TM reported by the HCPs, ambivalence arose around the legitimacy of this intervention. This result emphasizes the importance of changing HCPs’ attitudes regarding a given intervention to facilitate its implementation. Public Library of Science 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9970055/ /pubmed/36848354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078 Text en © 2023 Da Rocha Rodrigues et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Da Rocha Rodrigues, Gora Anex, Adrien Boegli, Monique Bollondi Pauly, Catherine Curtin, François Luthy, Christophe Desmeules, Jules Cedraschi, Christine Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title | Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title_full | Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title_short | Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study |
title_sort | is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darocharodriguesgora ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT anexadrien ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT boeglimonique ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT bollondipaulycatherine ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT curtinfrancois ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT luthychristophe ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT desmeulesjules ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy AT cedraschichristine ismassagealegitimatepartofnursingcareaqualitativestudy |