Cargando…

Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine more recent data to determine the extent of lingual nerve injury (LNI) following the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars (M3M). A systematic search of three databases [PubMed, Web of Science and OVID] was conducted following the Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Joshua, Feng, Boxi, Park, Joon Soo, Foo, Magdalen, Kruger, Estie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282185
_version_ 1784897854471405568
author Lee, Joshua
Feng, Boxi
Park, Joon Soo
Foo, Magdalen
Kruger, Estie
author_facet Lee, Joshua
Feng, Boxi
Park, Joon Soo
Foo, Magdalen
Kruger, Estie
author_sort Lee, Joshua
collection PubMed
description This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine more recent data to determine the extent of lingual nerve injury (LNI) following the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars (M3M). A systematic search of three databases [PubMed, Web of Science and OVID] was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies on patients who underwent surgical M3M extraction using the buccal approach without lingual flap retraction (BA-), buccal approach with lingual flap retraction (BA+), and lingual split technique (LS). The outcome measures expressed in LNI count were converted to risk ratios (RR). Twenty-seven studies were included in the systematic review, nine were eligible for meta-analysis. Combined RR for LNI (BA+ versus BA-) was 4.80 [95% Confidence Interval:3.28–7.02; P<0.00001]. The prevalence of permanent LNI following BA-, BA+ and LS (mean%±SD%) was 0.18±0.38, 0.07±0.21, and 0.28±0.48 respectively. This study concluded that there was an increased risk of temporary LNI following M3M surgical extractions using BA+ and LS. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there is a significant advantage of BA+ or LS in reducing permanent LNI risk. Operators should use lingual retraction with caution due to the increased temporary LNI risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9970109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99701092023-02-28 Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Joshua Feng, Boxi Park, Joon Soo Foo, Magdalen Kruger, Estie PLoS One Research Article This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine more recent data to determine the extent of lingual nerve injury (LNI) following the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars (M3M). A systematic search of three databases [PubMed, Web of Science and OVID] was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies on patients who underwent surgical M3M extraction using the buccal approach without lingual flap retraction (BA-), buccal approach with lingual flap retraction (BA+), and lingual split technique (LS). The outcome measures expressed in LNI count were converted to risk ratios (RR). Twenty-seven studies were included in the systematic review, nine were eligible for meta-analysis. Combined RR for LNI (BA+ versus BA-) was 4.80 [95% Confidence Interval:3.28–7.02; P<0.00001]. The prevalence of permanent LNI following BA-, BA+ and LS (mean%±SD%) was 0.18±0.38, 0.07±0.21, and 0.28±0.48 respectively. This study concluded that there was an increased risk of temporary LNI following M3M surgical extractions using BA+ and LS. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there is a significant advantage of BA+ or LS in reducing permanent LNI risk. Operators should use lingual retraction with caution due to the increased temporary LNI risk. Public Library of Science 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9970109/ /pubmed/36848347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282185 Text en © 2023 Lee et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Joshua
Feng, Boxi
Park, Joon Soo
Foo, Magdalen
Kruger, Estie
Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282185
work_keys_str_mv AT leejoshua incidenceoflingualnervedamagefollowingsurgicalextractionofmandibularthirdmolarswithlingualflapretractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengboxi incidenceoflingualnervedamagefollowingsurgicalextractionofmandibularthirdmolarswithlingualflapretractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parkjoonsoo incidenceoflingualnervedamagefollowingsurgicalextractionofmandibularthirdmolarswithlingualflapretractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT foomagdalen incidenceoflingualnervedamagefollowingsurgicalextractionofmandibularthirdmolarswithlingualflapretractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krugerestie incidenceoflingualnervedamagefollowingsurgicalextractionofmandibularthirdmolarswithlingualflapretractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis