Cargando…

Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Jie, Yu, Hongjie, Lin, Dang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13530
_version_ 1784897994399678464
author Gu, Jie
Yu, Hongjie
Lin, Dang
author_facet Gu, Jie
Yu, Hongjie
Lin, Dang
author_sort Gu, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Ten studies with 1091 patients were included for meta-analysis. A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73, p = 0.0002, I(2) = 0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92, p = 0.04, I(2) = 75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89, p = 0.009, I(2) = 0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels [MD 3.53, 95%CI −4.02,11.09, p = 0.36, I(2) = 49%], TTR [MD 8.64, 95%CI −1.72,18.65, p = 0.10, I(2) = 77%], circuit exchanges [OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12, p = 0.90, I(2) = 38%], HIT [OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52, p = 0.24, I(2) = 0%], minor bleeding events [OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29, p = 0.87, I(2) = 0%], hospital LOS [MD −2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15, p = 0.34, I(2) = 45%], ICU LOS [MD −4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62, p = 0.16, I(2) = 0%], mortality [OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85, p = 0.30, I(2) = 60%] and 30-day mortality [OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%]. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin probably be a potential choice for ECMO anticoagulation. However, based on the included studies’ limitation, the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin for anticoagulation in the ECMO population still require further prospective randomized controlled studies before a definite conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9970897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99708972023-03-01 Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions Gu, Jie Yu, Hongjie Lin, Dang Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Ten studies with 1091 patients were included for meta-analysis. A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73, p = 0.0002, I(2) = 0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92, p = 0.04, I(2) = 75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89, p = 0.009, I(2) = 0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels [MD 3.53, 95%CI −4.02,11.09, p = 0.36, I(2) = 49%], TTR [MD 8.64, 95%CI −1.72,18.65, p = 0.10, I(2) = 77%], circuit exchanges [OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12, p = 0.90, I(2) = 38%], HIT [OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52, p = 0.24, I(2) = 0%], minor bleeding events [OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29, p = 0.87, I(2) = 0%], hospital LOS [MD −2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15, p = 0.34, I(2) = 45%], ICU LOS [MD −4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62, p = 0.16, I(2) = 0%], mortality [OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85, p = 0.30, I(2) = 60%] and 30-day mortality [OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%]. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin probably be a potential choice for ECMO anticoagulation. However, based on the included studies’ limitation, the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin for anticoagulation in the ECMO population still require further prospective randomized controlled studies before a definite conclusion. Elsevier 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9970897/ /pubmed/36865472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13530 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Gu, Jie
Yu, Hongjie
Lin, Dang
Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title_full Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title_fullStr Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title_full_unstemmed Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title_short Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions
title_sort superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? too early to draw conclusions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13530
work_keys_str_mv AT gujie superiorityofbivalirudinoverheparinanticoagulationtherapyforextracorporealmembraneoxygenationtooearlytodrawconclusions
AT yuhongjie superiorityofbivalirudinoverheparinanticoagulationtherapyforextracorporealmembraneoxygenationtooearlytodrawconclusions
AT lindang superiorityofbivalirudinoverheparinanticoagulationtherapyforextracorporealmembraneoxygenationtooearlytodrawconclusions