Cargando…

Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare

Although referral letters (RLs) form a nodal point in a patient’s care journey, little is known about their informative value in child and adolescent mental healthcare. To determine the informative value of RLs to child and adolescent psychiatry, we conducted a chart review in medical records of min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydin, S., Crone, M. R., Siebelink, B. M., Numans, M. E., Vermeiren, R. R. J. M., Westenberg, P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7
_version_ 1784898005839642624
author Aydin, S.
Crone, M. R.
Siebelink, B. M.
Numans, M. E.
Vermeiren, R. R. J. M.
Westenberg, P. M.
author_facet Aydin, S.
Crone, M. R.
Siebelink, B. M.
Numans, M. E.
Vermeiren, R. R. J. M.
Westenberg, P. M.
author_sort Aydin, S.
collection PubMed
description Although referral letters (RLs) form a nodal point in a patient’s care journey, little is known about their informative value in child and adolescent mental healthcare. To determine the informative value of RLs to child and adolescent psychiatry, we conducted a chart review in medical records of minors registered at specialized mental healthcare between January 2015 and December 2017 (The Netherlands). Symptoms indicated in RLs originating from general practice (N = 723) were coded and cross-tabulated with the best estimate clinical classifications made in psychiatry. Results revealed that over half of the minors in the sample were classified in concordance with at least one reason for referral. We found fair to excellent discriminative ability for indications made in RLs concerning the most common psychiatric classifications (95% CI AUC: 60.9–70.6 for anxiety disorders to 90.5–100.0 for eating disorders). Logistic regression analyses suggested no statistically significant effects of gender, age, severity or mental healthcare history, with the exception of age and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD), as RLs better predicted ADHD with increasing age (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27). Contextual problems, such as difficulties studying, problems with parents or being bullied were indicated frequently and associated with classifications in various disorder groups. To conclude, general practitioners’ RLs showed informative value, contrary to common beliefs. Replication studies are needed to reliably incorporate RLs into the diagnostic work-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9970945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99709452023-03-01 Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare Aydin, S. Crone, M. R. Siebelink, B. M. Numans, M. E. Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. Westenberg, P. M. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Original Contribution Although referral letters (RLs) form a nodal point in a patient’s care journey, little is known about their informative value in child and adolescent mental healthcare. To determine the informative value of RLs to child and adolescent psychiatry, we conducted a chart review in medical records of minors registered at specialized mental healthcare between January 2015 and December 2017 (The Netherlands). Symptoms indicated in RLs originating from general practice (N = 723) were coded and cross-tabulated with the best estimate clinical classifications made in psychiatry. Results revealed that over half of the minors in the sample were classified in concordance with at least one reason for referral. We found fair to excellent discriminative ability for indications made in RLs concerning the most common psychiatric classifications (95% CI AUC: 60.9–70.6 for anxiety disorders to 90.5–100.0 for eating disorders). Logistic regression analyses suggested no statistically significant effects of gender, age, severity or mental healthcare history, with the exception of age and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD), as RLs better predicted ADHD with increasing age (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27). Contextual problems, such as difficulties studying, problems with parents or being bullied were indicated frequently and associated with classifications in various disorder groups. To conclude, general practitioners’ RLs showed informative value, contrary to common beliefs. Replication studies are needed to reliably incorporate RLs into the diagnostic work-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9970945/ /pubmed/34417876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Aydin, S.
Crone, M. R.
Siebelink, B. M.
Numans, M. E.
Vermeiren, R. R. J. M.
Westenberg, P. M.
Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title_full Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title_fullStr Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title_short Informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
title_sort informative value of referral letters from general practice for child and adolescent mental healthcare
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01859-7
work_keys_str_mv AT aydins informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare
AT cronemr informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare
AT siebelinkbm informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare
AT numansme informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare
AT vermeirenrrjm informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare
AT westenbergpm informativevalueofreferrallettersfromgeneralpracticeforchildandadolescentmentalhealthcare