Cargando…

Measurement method of tear meniscus height based on deep learning

Tear meniscus height (TMH) is an important reference parameter in the diagnosis of dry eye disease. However, most traditional methods of measuring TMH are manual or semi-automatic, which causes the measurement of TMH to be prone to the influence of subjective factors, time consuming, and laborious....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan, Cheng, Hua, Rongrong, Guo, Ping, Lin, Peijie, Wang, Jiantao, Yang, Weihua, Hong, Xiangqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1126754
Descripción
Sumario:Tear meniscus height (TMH) is an important reference parameter in the diagnosis of dry eye disease. However, most traditional methods of measuring TMH are manual or semi-automatic, which causes the measurement of TMH to be prone to the influence of subjective factors, time consuming, and laborious. To solve these problems, a segmentation algorithm based on deep learning and image processing was proposed to realize the automatic measurement of TMH. To accurately segment the tear meniscus region, the segmentation algorithm designed in this study is based on the DeepLabv3 architecture and combines the partial structure of the ResNet50, GoogleNet, and FCN networks for further improvements. A total of 305 ocular surface images were used in this study, which were divided into training and testing sets. The training set was used to train the network model, and the testing set was used to evaluate the model performance. In the experiment, for tear meniscus segmentation, the average intersection over union was 0.896, the dice coefficient was 0.884, and the sensitivity was 0.877. For the central ring of corneal projection ring segmentation, the average intersection over union was 0.932, the dice coefficient was 0.926, and the sensitivity was 0.947. According to the evaluation index comparison, the segmentation model used in this study was superior to the existing model. Finally, the measurement outcome of TMH of the testing set using the proposed method was compared with manual measurement results. All measurement results were directly compared via linear regression; the regression line was y0.98x−0.02, and the overall correlation coefficient was r(2)0.94. Thus, the proposed method for measuring TMH in this paper is highly consistent with manual measurement and can realize the automatic measurement of TMH and assist clinicians in the diagnosis of dry eye disease.