Cargando…
Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance
This paper analyzes the savings measures introduced by Ebbinghaus in his monograph of 1885. He measured memory retention in terms of the learning time saved in subsequent study trials relative to the time spent on the first learning trial. We prove mathematically that Ebbinghaus’ savings measure is...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02172-3 |
_version_ | 1784898032367566848 |
---|---|
author | Murre, Jaap M. J. Chessa, Antonio G. |
author_facet | Murre, Jaap M. J. Chessa, Antonio G. |
author_sort | Murre, Jaap M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper analyzes the savings measures introduced by Ebbinghaus in his monograph of 1885. He measured memory retention in terms of the learning time saved in subsequent study trials relative to the time spent on the first learning trial. We prove mathematically that Ebbinghaus’ savings measure is independent of initial encoding strength, learning time, and relearning times. This theoretical model-free result demonstrates that savings is in a sense a very ‘pure’ measure of memory. Considering savings as an old-fashioned and unwieldy measure of memory may be unwarranted given this interesting property, which hitherto seems to have been overlooked. We contrast this with often used forgetting functions based on recall probability, such as the power function, showing that we should expect a lower forgetting rate in the initial portion of the curve for material that has been learned less well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9971077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99710772023-03-01 Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance Murre, Jaap M. J. Chessa, Antonio G. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report This paper analyzes the savings measures introduced by Ebbinghaus in his monograph of 1885. He measured memory retention in terms of the learning time saved in subsequent study trials relative to the time spent on the first learning trial. We prove mathematically that Ebbinghaus’ savings measure is independent of initial encoding strength, learning time, and relearning times. This theoretical model-free result demonstrates that savings is in a sense a very ‘pure’ measure of memory. Considering savings as an old-fashioned and unwieldy measure of memory may be unwarranted given this interesting property, which hitherto seems to have been overlooked. We contrast this with often used forgetting functions based on recall probability, such as the power function, showing that we should expect a lower forgetting rate in the initial portion of the curve for material that has been learned less well. Springer US 2022-09-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9971077/ /pubmed/36069971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02172-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Murre, Jaap M. J. Chessa, Antonio G. Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title | Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title_full | Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title_fullStr | Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title_short | Why Ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
title_sort | why ebbinghaus’ savings method from 1885 is a very ‘pure’ measure of memory performance |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02172-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrejaapmj whyebbinghaussavingsmethodfrom1885isaverypuremeasureofmemoryperformance AT chessaantoniog whyebbinghaussavingsmethodfrom1885isaverypuremeasureofmemoryperformance |