Cargando…

Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model

PURPOSE: Fluorescence imaging (FLI) using targeted near-infrared (NIR) conjugates aids the detection of tumour lesions pre- and intraoperatively. The optimisation of tumour visualisation and contrast is essential and can be achieved through high tumour-specificity and low background signal. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García de Jalón, Elvira, Kleinmanns, Katrin, Fosse, Vibeke, Davidson, Ben, Bjørge, Line, Haug, Bengt Erik, McCormack, Emmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34888759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01685-y
_version_ 1784898037905096704
author García de Jalón, Elvira
Kleinmanns, Katrin
Fosse, Vibeke
Davidson, Ben
Bjørge, Line
Haug, Bengt Erik
McCormack, Emmet
author_facet García de Jalón, Elvira
Kleinmanns, Katrin
Fosse, Vibeke
Davidson, Ben
Bjørge, Line
Haug, Bengt Erik
McCormack, Emmet
author_sort García de Jalón, Elvira
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Fluorescence imaging (FLI) using targeted near-infrared (NIR) conjugates aids the detection of tumour lesions pre- and intraoperatively. The optimisation of tumour visualisation and contrast is essential and can be achieved through high tumour-specificity and low background signal. However, the choice of fluorophore is recognised to alter biodistribution and clearance of conjugates and is therefore a determining factor in the specificity of target binding. Although ZW800-1, IRDye® 800CW and ICG are the most commonly employed NIR fluorophores in clinical settings, the fluorophore with optimal in vivo characteristics has yet to be determined. Therefore, we aimed to characterise the impact the choice of fluorophore has on the biodistribution, specificity and contrast, by comparing five different NIR fluorophores conjugated to folate, in an ovarian cancer model. PROCEDURES: ZW800-1, ZW800-1 Forte, IRDye® 800CW, ICG-OSu and an in-house synthesised Cy7 derivative were conjugated to folate through an ethylenediamine linker resulting in conjugates 1–5, respectively. The optical properties of all conjugates were determined by spectroscopy, the specificity was assessed in vitro by flow cytometry and FLI, and the biodistribution was studied in vivo and ex vivo in a subcutaneous Skov-3 ovarian cancer model. RESULTS: We demonstrated time- and receptor-dependent binding of folate conjugates in vitro and in vivo. Healthy tissue clearance characteristics and tumour-specific signal varied between conjugates 1–5. ZW800-1 Forte (2) revealed the highest contrast in folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive xenografts and showed statistically significant target specificity. While conjugates 1, 2 and 3 are renally cleared, hepatobiliary excretion and no or very low accumulation in tumours was observed for 4 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of fluorophore has a significant impact on the biodistribution and tumour contrast. ZW800-1 Forte (2) exhibited the best properties of those tested, with significant specific fluorescence signal. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-021-01685-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99711012023-03-01 Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model García de Jalón, Elvira Kleinmanns, Katrin Fosse, Vibeke Davidson, Ben Bjørge, Line Haug, Bengt Erik McCormack, Emmet Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: Fluorescence imaging (FLI) using targeted near-infrared (NIR) conjugates aids the detection of tumour lesions pre- and intraoperatively. The optimisation of tumour visualisation and contrast is essential and can be achieved through high tumour-specificity and low background signal. However, the choice of fluorophore is recognised to alter biodistribution and clearance of conjugates and is therefore a determining factor in the specificity of target binding. Although ZW800-1, IRDye® 800CW and ICG are the most commonly employed NIR fluorophores in clinical settings, the fluorophore with optimal in vivo characteristics has yet to be determined. Therefore, we aimed to characterise the impact the choice of fluorophore has on the biodistribution, specificity and contrast, by comparing five different NIR fluorophores conjugated to folate, in an ovarian cancer model. PROCEDURES: ZW800-1, ZW800-1 Forte, IRDye® 800CW, ICG-OSu and an in-house synthesised Cy7 derivative were conjugated to folate through an ethylenediamine linker resulting in conjugates 1–5, respectively. The optical properties of all conjugates were determined by spectroscopy, the specificity was assessed in vitro by flow cytometry and FLI, and the biodistribution was studied in vivo and ex vivo in a subcutaneous Skov-3 ovarian cancer model. RESULTS: We demonstrated time- and receptor-dependent binding of folate conjugates in vitro and in vivo. Healthy tissue clearance characteristics and tumour-specific signal varied between conjugates 1–5. ZW800-1 Forte (2) revealed the highest contrast in folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive xenografts and showed statistically significant target specificity. While conjugates 1, 2 and 3 are renally cleared, hepatobiliary excretion and no or very low accumulation in tumours was observed for 4 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of fluorophore has a significant impact on the biodistribution and tumour contrast. ZW800-1 Forte (2) exhibited the best properties of those tested, with significant specific fluorescence signal. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-021-01685-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9971101/ /pubmed/34888759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01685-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
García de Jalón, Elvira
Kleinmanns, Katrin
Fosse, Vibeke
Davidson, Ben
Bjørge, Line
Haug, Bengt Erik
McCormack, Emmet
Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title_full Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title_short Comparison of Five Near-Infrared Fluorescent Folate Conjugates in an Ovarian Cancer Model
title_sort comparison of five near-infrared fluorescent folate conjugates in an ovarian cancer model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34888759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01685-y
work_keys_str_mv AT garciadejalonelvira comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT kleinmannskatrin comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT fossevibeke comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT davidsonben comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT bjørgeline comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT haugbengterik comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel
AT mccormackemmet comparisonoffivenearinfraredfluorescentfolateconjugatesinanovariancancermodel