Cargando…

Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems

PURPOSE: To compare the measured or calculated angle Kappa using Oculus pentacam HR, Sirius and Orbscan III devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized cohort study, conducted on 47 eyes of 47 healthy orthotropic individuals, with an age range of 18–50 years and a corrected Snellen’s dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A., Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed, Zaki, Rania Gamal Eldin, Othman, Ihab Saad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02433-z
_version_ 1784898039159193600
author Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A.
Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed
Zaki, Rania Gamal Eldin
Othman, Ihab Saad
author_facet Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A.
Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed
Zaki, Rania Gamal Eldin
Othman, Ihab Saad
author_sort Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the measured or calculated angle Kappa using Oculus pentacam HR, Sirius and Orbscan III devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized cohort study, conducted on 47 eyes of 47 healthy orthotropic individuals, with an age range of 18–50 years and a corrected Snellen’s distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.8 decimal or better. Angle Kappa is assessed directly using Orbscan® III software version 1.8.165.1. (Bausch and Lomb Rochester, New York, United States), while Pentacam® HR 1.21r.65 (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Sirius device (CSO, version 3.2.1.60, Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) were used to calculate angle kappa indirectly. RESULTS: Least mean difference of estimated angle Kappa was between Orbscan and Pentacam devices (− 0.18° ± 1.8), and it was statistically insignificant (p value = 0.1294). Differences between both Orbscan and Sirius, and Pentacam and Sirius were statistically significant (p value = 0.0004 and < 0.0001 consecutively). Bland Altman analysis showed a 95% confidence interval between Orbscan III and Pentacam of − 3.76 to 3.4 and between Orbscan III and Sirius of − 3.79 to 2.26. CONCLUSION: Pentacam parameters can be used as a reliable method to calculate angle kappa indirectly, without usage of any additional measurements from other machine. Sirius device parameters could also be used, but with less accurate results. A simple modification to those devices’ software to calculate it, and incorporate it in the printout is possible, and highly recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99711062023-03-01 Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A. Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed Zaki, Rania Gamal Eldin Othman, Ihab Saad Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To compare the measured or calculated angle Kappa using Oculus pentacam HR, Sirius and Orbscan III devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized cohort study, conducted on 47 eyes of 47 healthy orthotropic individuals, with an age range of 18–50 years and a corrected Snellen’s distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.8 decimal or better. Angle Kappa is assessed directly using Orbscan® III software version 1.8.165.1. (Bausch and Lomb Rochester, New York, United States), while Pentacam® HR 1.21r.65 (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Sirius device (CSO, version 3.2.1.60, Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) were used to calculate angle kappa indirectly. RESULTS: Least mean difference of estimated angle Kappa was between Orbscan and Pentacam devices (− 0.18° ± 1.8), and it was statistically insignificant (p value = 0.1294). Differences between both Orbscan and Sirius, and Pentacam and Sirius were statistically significant (p value = 0.0004 and < 0.0001 consecutively). Bland Altman analysis showed a 95% confidence interval between Orbscan III and Pentacam of − 3.76 to 3.4 and between Orbscan III and Sirius of − 3.79 to 2.26. CONCLUSION: Pentacam parameters can be used as a reliable method to calculate angle kappa indirectly, without usage of any additional measurements from other machine. Sirius device parameters could also be used, but with less accurate results. A simple modification to those devices’ software to calculate it, and incorporate it in the printout is possible, and highly recommended. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9971106/ /pubmed/35902424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02433-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Awad-Allah, Mo’mena Ahmad A.
Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed
Zaki, Rania Gamal Eldin
Othman, Ihab Saad
Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title_full Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title_fullStr Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title_full_unstemmed Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title_short Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
title_sort angle kappa agreement between scheimpflug tomography, combined placido scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02433-z
work_keys_str_mv AT awadallahmomenaahmada anglekappaagreementbetweenscheimpflugtomographycombinedplacidoscheimpflugandcombinedslitscanningplacidosystems
AT ghariebheshammohamed anglekappaagreementbetweenscheimpflugtomographycombinedplacidoscheimpflugandcombinedslitscanningplacidosystems
AT zakiraniagamaleldin anglekappaagreementbetweenscheimpflugtomographycombinedplacidoscheimpflugandcombinedslitscanningplacidosystems
AT othmanihabsaad anglekappaagreementbetweenscheimpflugtomographycombinedplacidoscheimpflugandcombinedslitscanningplacidosystems