Cargando…
Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’
How do we remember delayed intentions? Three decades of research into prospective memory have provided insight into the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in this form of memory. However, we depend on more than just our brains to remember intentions. We also use external props and tools such a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4 |
_version_ | 1784898043833745408 |
---|---|
author | Gilbert, Sam J. Boldt, Annika Sachdeva, Chhavi Scarampi, Chiara Tsai, Pei-Chun |
author_facet | Gilbert, Sam J. Boldt, Annika Sachdeva, Chhavi Scarampi, Chiara Tsai, Pei-Chun |
author_sort | Gilbert, Sam J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | How do we remember delayed intentions? Three decades of research into prospective memory have provided insight into the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in this form of memory. However, we depend on more than just our brains to remember intentions. We also use external props and tools such as calendars and diaries, strategically placed objects, and technologies such as smartphone alerts. This is known as ‘intention offloading’. Despite the progress in our understanding of brain-based prospective memory, we know much less about the role of intention offloading in individuals’ ability to fulfil delayed intentions. Here, we review recent research into intention offloading, with a particular focus on how individuals decide between storing intentions in internal memory versus external reminders. We also review studies investigating how intention offloading changes across the lifespan and how it relates to underlying brain mechanisms. We conclude that intention offloading is highly effective, experimentally tractable, and guided by metacognitive processes. Individuals have systematic biases in their offloading strategies that are stable over time. Evidence also suggests that individual differences and developmental changes in offloading strategies are driven at least in part by metacognitive processes. Therefore, metacognitive interventions could play an important role in promoting individuals’ adaptive use of cognitive tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9971128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99711282023-03-01 Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ Gilbert, Sam J. Boldt, Annika Sachdeva, Chhavi Scarampi, Chiara Tsai, Pei-Chun Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical/Review How do we remember delayed intentions? Three decades of research into prospective memory have provided insight into the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in this form of memory. However, we depend on more than just our brains to remember intentions. We also use external props and tools such as calendars and diaries, strategically placed objects, and technologies such as smartphone alerts. This is known as ‘intention offloading’. Despite the progress in our understanding of brain-based prospective memory, we know much less about the role of intention offloading in individuals’ ability to fulfil delayed intentions. Here, we review recent research into intention offloading, with a particular focus on how individuals decide between storing intentions in internal memory versus external reminders. We also review studies investigating how intention offloading changes across the lifespan and how it relates to underlying brain mechanisms. We conclude that intention offloading is highly effective, experimentally tractable, and guided by metacognitive processes. Individuals have systematic biases in their offloading strategies that are stable over time. Evidence also suggests that individual differences and developmental changes in offloading strategies are driven at least in part by metacognitive processes. Therefore, metacognitive interventions could play an important role in promoting individuals’ adaptive use of cognitive tools. Springer US 2022-07-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9971128/ /pubmed/35789477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Theoretical/Review Gilbert, Sam J. Boldt, Annika Sachdeva, Chhavi Scarampi, Chiara Tsai, Pei-Chun Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title | Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title_full | Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title_fullStr | Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title_short | Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’ |
title_sort | outsourcing memory to external tools: a review of ‘intention offloading’ |
topic | Theoretical/Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilbertsamj outsourcingmemorytoexternaltoolsareviewofintentionoffloading AT boldtannika outsourcingmemorytoexternaltoolsareviewofintentionoffloading AT sachdevachhavi outsourcingmemorytoexternaltoolsareviewofintentionoffloading AT scarampichiara outsourcingmemorytoexternaltoolsareviewofintentionoffloading AT tsaipeichun outsourcingmemorytoexternaltoolsareviewofintentionoffloading |