Cargando…

Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep

While the breed of cattle can impact on the composition and structure of microbial communities in the rumen, breed-specific effects on rumen microbial communities have rarely been examined in sheep. In addition, rumen microbial composition can differ between ruminal fractions, and be associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLoughlin, Steven, Spillane, Charles, Campion, Francis P., Claffey, Noel, Sosa, Chrystian C., McNicholas, Yvonne, Smith, Paul E., Diskin, Michael G., Waters, Sinéad M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28909-1
_version_ 1784898063902441472
author McLoughlin, Steven
Spillane, Charles
Campion, Francis P.
Claffey, Noel
Sosa, Chrystian C.
McNicholas, Yvonne
Smith, Paul E.
Diskin, Michael G.
Waters, Sinéad M.
author_facet McLoughlin, Steven
Spillane, Charles
Campion, Francis P.
Claffey, Noel
Sosa, Chrystian C.
McNicholas, Yvonne
Smith, Paul E.
Diskin, Michael G.
Waters, Sinéad M.
author_sort McLoughlin, Steven
collection PubMed
description While the breed of cattle can impact on the composition and structure of microbial communities in the rumen, breed-specific effects on rumen microbial communities have rarely been examined in sheep. In addition, rumen microbial composition can differ between ruminal fractions, and be associated with ruminant feed efficiency and methane emissions. In this study, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was used to investigate the effects of breed and ruminal fraction on bacterial and archaeal communities in sheep. Solid, liquid and epithelial rumen samples were obtained from a total of 36 lambs, across 4 different sheep breeds (Cheviot (n = 10), Connemara (n = 6), Lanark (n = 10) and Perth (n = 10)), undergoing detailed measurements of feed efficiency, who were offered a nut based cereal diet ad-libitum supplemented with grass silage. Our results demonstrate that the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was lowest for the Cheviot (most efficient), and highest for the Connemara breed (least efficient). In the solid fraction, bacterial community richness was lowest in the Cheviot breed, while Sharpea azabuensis was most abundant in the Perth breed. Lanark, Cheviot and Perth breeds exhibited a significantly higher abundance of epithelial associated Succiniclasticum compared to the Connemara breed. When comparing ruminal fractions, Campylobacter, Family XIII, Mogibacterium, and Lachnospiraceae UCG-008 were most abundant in the epithelial fraction. Our findings indicate that breed can impact the abundance of specific bacterial taxa in sheep while having little effect on the overall composition of the microbial community. This finding has implications for genetic selection breeding programs aimed at improving feed conversion efficiency of sheep. Furthermore, the variations in the distribution of bacterial species identified between ruminal fractions, notably between solid and epithelial fractions, reveals a rumen fraction bias, which has implications for sheep rumen sampling techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99712152023-03-01 Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep McLoughlin, Steven Spillane, Charles Campion, Francis P. Claffey, Noel Sosa, Chrystian C. McNicholas, Yvonne Smith, Paul E. Diskin, Michael G. Waters, Sinéad M. Sci Rep Article While the breed of cattle can impact on the composition and structure of microbial communities in the rumen, breed-specific effects on rumen microbial communities have rarely been examined in sheep. In addition, rumen microbial composition can differ between ruminal fractions, and be associated with ruminant feed efficiency and methane emissions. In this study, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was used to investigate the effects of breed and ruminal fraction on bacterial and archaeal communities in sheep. Solid, liquid and epithelial rumen samples were obtained from a total of 36 lambs, across 4 different sheep breeds (Cheviot (n = 10), Connemara (n = 6), Lanark (n = 10) and Perth (n = 10)), undergoing detailed measurements of feed efficiency, who were offered a nut based cereal diet ad-libitum supplemented with grass silage. Our results demonstrate that the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was lowest for the Cheviot (most efficient), and highest for the Connemara breed (least efficient). In the solid fraction, bacterial community richness was lowest in the Cheviot breed, while Sharpea azabuensis was most abundant in the Perth breed. Lanark, Cheviot and Perth breeds exhibited a significantly higher abundance of epithelial associated Succiniclasticum compared to the Connemara breed. When comparing ruminal fractions, Campylobacter, Family XIII, Mogibacterium, and Lachnospiraceae UCG-008 were most abundant in the epithelial fraction. Our findings indicate that breed can impact the abundance of specific bacterial taxa in sheep while having little effect on the overall composition of the microbial community. This finding has implications for genetic selection breeding programs aimed at improving feed conversion efficiency of sheep. Furthermore, the variations in the distribution of bacterial species identified between ruminal fractions, notably between solid and epithelial fractions, reveals a rumen fraction bias, which has implications for sheep rumen sampling techniques. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9971215/ /pubmed/36849493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28909-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McLoughlin, Steven
Spillane, Charles
Campion, Francis P.
Claffey, Noel
Sosa, Chrystian C.
McNicholas, Yvonne
Smith, Paul E.
Diskin, Michael G.
Waters, Sinéad M.
Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title_full Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title_fullStr Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title_short Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
title_sort breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28909-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mcloughlinsteven breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT spillanecharles breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT campionfrancisp breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT claffeynoel breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT sosachrystianc breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT mcnicholasyvonne breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT smithpaule breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT diskinmichaelg breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep
AT waterssineadm breedandruminalfractioneffectsonbacterialandarchaealcommunitycompositioninsheep