Cargando…
Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence?
BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolisation is well established as a treatment for symptomatic fibroids, however, there remain some uncertainties. We have carried out a focused literature review on three particularly challenging aspects – post-procedure fertility, symptomatic adenomyosis and large volum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2 |
_version_ | 1784898095078703104 |
---|---|
author | Mailli, Leto Patel, Shyamal Das, Raj Chun, Joo Young Renani, Seyed Das, Sourav Ratnam, Lakshmi |
author_facet | Mailli, Leto Patel, Shyamal Das, Raj Chun, Joo Young Renani, Seyed Das, Sourav Ratnam, Lakshmi |
author_sort | Mailli, Leto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolisation is well established as a treatment for symptomatic fibroids, however, there remain some uncertainties. We have carried out a focused literature review on three particularly challenging aspects – post-procedure fertility, symptomatic adenomyosis and large volume fibroids and uteri, to enable operators to utilise evidence-based guidance in patient selection, consent, and management. REVIEW: Literature searches were performed of the PubMed/Medline, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The outcomes of our analysis of studies which recorded fertility rates in women desiring pregnancy following UAE for symptomatic fibroids found an overall mean pregnancy rate of 39.4%, live birth rate of 69.2% and miscarriage rate of 22%. The major confounding factor was patient age with many studies including women over 40 years who already have lower fertility compared to younger cohorts. Miscarriage rates and pregnancy rates in the studies analysed were comparable to the age matched population. Treatment of pure adenomyosis and adenomyosis with co-existing uterine fibroids with UAE has been shown to produce symptomatic improvement with better outcomes in those with combined disease. Although the effectiveness is not as high as it is in pure fibroid disease, UAE provides a viable and safe alternative for patients seeking symptom relief and uterine preservation. Our analysis of studies assessing the outcomes of UAE in patients with large volume uteri and giant fibroids (> 10 cm) demonstrate no significant difference in major complication rates demonstrating that fibroid size should not be a contraindication to UAE. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest uterine artery embolisation can be offered to women desiring pregnancy with fertility and miscarriage rates comparable to that of the age-matched general population. It is also an effective therapeutic option for symptomatic adenomyosis as well as for the treatment of large fibroids > 10 cm in diameter. Caution is advised in those with uterine volumes greater than 1000cm(3). It is however clear that the quality of evidence needs to be improved on with an emphasis on well-designed randomised controlled trials addressing all three areas and the consistent use of validated quality of life questionnaires for outcome assessment to enable effective comparison of outcomes in different studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9971423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99714232023-03-01 Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? Mailli, Leto Patel, Shyamal Das, Raj Chun, Joo Young Renani, Seyed Das, Sourav Ratnam, Lakshmi CVIR Endovasc Review Article BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolisation is well established as a treatment for symptomatic fibroids, however, there remain some uncertainties. We have carried out a focused literature review on three particularly challenging aspects – post-procedure fertility, symptomatic adenomyosis and large volume fibroids and uteri, to enable operators to utilise evidence-based guidance in patient selection, consent, and management. REVIEW: Literature searches were performed of the PubMed/Medline, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The outcomes of our analysis of studies which recorded fertility rates in women desiring pregnancy following UAE for symptomatic fibroids found an overall mean pregnancy rate of 39.4%, live birth rate of 69.2% and miscarriage rate of 22%. The major confounding factor was patient age with many studies including women over 40 years who already have lower fertility compared to younger cohorts. Miscarriage rates and pregnancy rates in the studies analysed were comparable to the age matched population. Treatment of pure adenomyosis and adenomyosis with co-existing uterine fibroids with UAE has been shown to produce symptomatic improvement with better outcomes in those with combined disease. Although the effectiveness is not as high as it is in pure fibroid disease, UAE provides a viable and safe alternative for patients seeking symptom relief and uterine preservation. Our analysis of studies assessing the outcomes of UAE in patients with large volume uteri and giant fibroids (> 10 cm) demonstrate no significant difference in major complication rates demonstrating that fibroid size should not be a contraindication to UAE. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest uterine artery embolisation can be offered to women desiring pregnancy with fertility and miscarriage rates comparable to that of the age-matched general population. It is also an effective therapeutic option for symptomatic adenomyosis as well as for the treatment of large fibroids > 10 cm in diameter. Caution is advised in those with uterine volumes greater than 1000cm(3). It is however clear that the quality of evidence needs to be improved on with an emphasis on well-designed randomised controlled trials addressing all three areas and the consistent use of validated quality of life questionnaires for outcome assessment to enable effective comparison of outcomes in different studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9971423/ /pubmed/36847951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mailli, Leto Patel, Shyamal Das, Raj Chun, Joo Young Renani, Seyed Das, Sourav Ratnam, Lakshmi Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title | Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title_full | Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title_fullStr | Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title_short | Uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
title_sort | uterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size – what is the evidence? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00353-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maillileto uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT patelshyamal uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT dasraj uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT chunjooyoung uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT renaniseyed uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT dassourav uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence AT ratnamlakshmi uterinearteryembolisationfertilityadenomyosisandsizewhatistheevidence |