Cargando…

Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of inhomogeneity corrections calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS) using various densities of materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gammex Computed tomography electron density inserts (EDI’s; 14 no’s) were used to generate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putha, Suman Kumar, Lobo, Dilson, Raghavendra, Holla, Srinvias, Challapalli, Banerjee, Sourjya, Athiyamaan, M S, K, Johan Sunny, Krishna, Abhishek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579997
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4155
_version_ 1784898106829045760
author Putha, Suman Kumar
Lobo, Dilson
Raghavendra, Holla
Srinvias, Challapalli
Banerjee, Sourjya
Athiyamaan, M S
K, Johan Sunny
Krishna, Abhishek
author_facet Putha, Suman Kumar
Lobo, Dilson
Raghavendra, Holla
Srinvias, Challapalli
Banerjee, Sourjya
Athiyamaan, M S
K, Johan Sunny
Krishna, Abhishek
author_sort Putha, Suman Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of inhomogeneity corrections calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS) using various densities of materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gammex Computed tomography electron density inserts (EDI’s; 14 no’s) were used to generate the CT to ED curve with high speed GE CT scanner by noting down the respective HU values of each rod. Treatment plans were generated in XiO TPS with three inhomogeneous phantoms (comprising combination of water, lung and bone equivalent slabs) with different field sizes and for EDI (8 no’s) inserted in slots of acrylic tray and validation was carried out using 2D array detector with 20cm×20cm field size for 200 MU. Point dose and fluence measurements were carried with inhomogeneous phantoms combinations and EDI’s (placed on the locally fabricated box filled with water medium). RESULTS: The mean percentage deviations with standard deviation of calculated point doses against measured ones obtained with 2D array detector at iso-center plane for all three inhomogeneous phantom combinations were found to be -1.13%±0.13%, -3.51%±0.14% and -0.63%±0.27% respectively. On point doses measured under each individual EDI, over all percentage deviation with standard deviation observed is -2.04% ± 1.1%. CONCLUSION: The described method can be implemented in any newly established radiotherapy department as a routine quality measure of TPS to verify its efficacy in performing of inhomogeneity calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99714742023-03-01 Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System Putha, Suman Kumar Lobo, Dilson Raghavendra, Holla Srinvias, Challapalli Banerjee, Sourjya Athiyamaan, M S K, Johan Sunny Krishna, Abhishek Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of inhomogeneity corrections calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS) using various densities of materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gammex Computed tomography electron density inserts (EDI’s; 14 no’s) were used to generate the CT to ED curve with high speed GE CT scanner by noting down the respective HU values of each rod. Treatment plans were generated in XiO TPS with three inhomogeneous phantoms (comprising combination of water, lung and bone equivalent slabs) with different field sizes and for EDI (8 no’s) inserted in slots of acrylic tray and validation was carried out using 2D array detector with 20cm×20cm field size for 200 MU. Point dose and fluence measurements were carried with inhomogeneous phantoms combinations and EDI’s (placed on the locally fabricated box filled with water medium). RESULTS: The mean percentage deviations with standard deviation of calculated point doses against measured ones obtained with 2D array detector at iso-center plane for all three inhomogeneous phantom combinations were found to be -1.13%±0.13%, -3.51%±0.14% and -0.63%±0.27% respectively. On point doses measured under each individual EDI, over all percentage deviation with standard deviation observed is -2.04% ± 1.1%. CONCLUSION: The described method can be implemented in any newly established radiotherapy department as a routine quality measure of TPS to verify its efficacy in performing of inhomogeneity calculation. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9971474/ /pubmed/36579997 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4155 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License.(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Putha, Suman Kumar
Lobo, Dilson
Raghavendra, Holla
Srinvias, Challapalli
Banerjee, Sourjya
Athiyamaan, M S
K, Johan Sunny
Krishna, Abhishek
Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title_full Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title_fullStr Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title_short Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Correction Performed by Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
title_sort evaluation of inhomogeneity correction performed by radiotherapy treatment planning system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579997
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4155
work_keys_str_mv AT puthasumankumar evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT lobodilson evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT raghavendraholla evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT srinviaschallapalli evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT banerjeesourjya evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT athiyamaanms evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT kjohansunny evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT krishnaabhishek evaluationofinhomogeneitycorrectionperformedbyradiotherapytreatmentplanningsystem