Cargando…

Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation

One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konerding, Wiebke S., Baumhoff, Peter, Kral, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8
_version_ 1784898119104724992
author Konerding, Wiebke S.
Baumhoff, Peter
Kral, Andrej
author_facet Konerding, Wiebke S.
Baumhoff, Peter
Kral, Andrej
author_sort Konerding, Wiebke S.
collection PubMed
description One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been discussed in the literature as “rescue factors” from FNS: electrode configuration (broad to focused), pulse shape (symmetric biphasic to pseudo-monophasic), and pulse polarity (cathodic to anodic). An FNS was assessed, based on electrophysiological thresholds, in 204 electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output functions recorded from 33 ears of 26 guinea pigs. The stimulation level difference between auditory nerve eCAP threshold and FNS threshold was expressed as the eCAP-to-FNS offset. Coincidental FNS occurred in all animals and in 45% of all recordings. A change from monopolar to focused (bipolar, tripolar) configurations minimized FNS. The Euclidean distance between the CI contacts and the facial nerve explained no more than 33% of the variance in FNS thresholds. For both the FNS threshold and the eCAP-to-FNS offset, the change from cathodic to anodic pulse polarity significantly reduced FNS and permitted a gain of 14–71% of the dynamic range of the eCAP response. This “anodic rescue effect” was stronger for pseudo-monophasic pulses as compared to the symmetric biphasic pulse shape. These results provide possible mechanisms underlying recent clinical interventions to alleviate FNS. The “anodic-rescue effect” may offer a non-invasive therapeutic option for FNS in human CI users that should be tested clinically, preferably in combination with current-focusing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99715312023-03-01 Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation Konerding, Wiebke S. Baumhoff, Peter Kral, Andrej J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been discussed in the literature as “rescue factors” from FNS: electrode configuration (broad to focused), pulse shape (symmetric biphasic to pseudo-monophasic), and pulse polarity (cathodic to anodic). An FNS was assessed, based on electrophysiological thresholds, in 204 electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output functions recorded from 33 ears of 26 guinea pigs. The stimulation level difference between auditory nerve eCAP threshold and FNS threshold was expressed as the eCAP-to-FNS offset. Coincidental FNS occurred in all animals and in 45% of all recordings. A change from monopolar to focused (bipolar, tripolar) configurations minimized FNS. The Euclidean distance between the CI contacts and the facial nerve explained no more than 33% of the variance in FNS thresholds. For both the FNS threshold and the eCAP-to-FNS offset, the change from cathodic to anodic pulse polarity significantly reduced FNS and permitted a gain of 14–71% of the dynamic range of the eCAP response. This “anodic rescue effect” was stronger for pseudo-monophasic pulses as compared to the symmetric biphasic pulse shape. These results provide possible mechanisms underlying recent clinical interventions to alleviate FNS. The “anodic-rescue effect” may offer a non-invasive therapeutic option for FNS in human CI users that should be tested clinically, preferably in combination with current-focusing methods. Springer US 2022-12-02 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9971531/ /pubmed/36459250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Konerding, Wiebke S.
Baumhoff, Peter
Kral, Andrej
Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title_full Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title_fullStr Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title_short Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation
title_sort anodic polarity minimizes facial nerve stimulation as a side effect of cochlear implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8
work_keys_str_mv AT konerdingwiebkes anodicpolarityminimizesfacialnervestimulationasasideeffectofcochlearimplantation
AT baumhoffpeter anodicpolarityminimizesfacialnervestimulationasasideeffectofcochlearimplantation
AT kralandrej anodicpolarityminimizesfacialnervestimulationasasideeffectofcochlearimplantation