Cargando…

Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients. METHODS: Data from 1210 HGSC pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitiyarachchi, Omali, Lee, Yeh Chen, Sim, Hao-Wen, Srirangan, Sivatharsny, Mapagu, Cristina, Kirk, Judy, Harnett, Paul R., Balleine, Rosemary L., Bowtell, David D.L., Samimi, Goli, Brand, Alison H., Marsh, Deborah J., Beale, Philip, Anderson, Lyndal, Bouantoun, Natalie, Provan, Pamela, Ramus, Susan J., DeFazio, Anna, Friedlander, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101638
_version_ 1784898121704144896
author Pitiyarachchi, Omali
Lee, Yeh Chen
Sim, Hao-Wen
Srirangan, Sivatharsny
Mapagu, Cristina
Kirk, Judy
Harnett, Paul R.
Balleine, Rosemary L.
Bowtell, David D.L.
Samimi, Goli
Brand, Alison H.
Marsh, Deborah J.
Beale, Philip
Anderson, Lyndal
Bouantoun, Natalie
Provan, Pamela
Ramus, Susan J.
DeFazio, Anna
Friedlander, Michael
author_facet Pitiyarachchi, Omali
Lee, Yeh Chen
Sim, Hao-Wen
Srirangan, Sivatharsny
Mapagu, Cristina
Kirk, Judy
Harnett, Paul R.
Balleine, Rosemary L.
Bowtell, David D.L.
Samimi, Goli
Brand, Alison H.
Marsh, Deborah J.
Beale, Philip
Anderson, Lyndal
Bouantoun, Natalie
Provan, Pamela
Ramus, Susan J.
DeFazio, Anna
Friedlander, Michael
author_sort Pitiyarachchi, Omali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients. METHODS: Data from 1210 HGSC patients in AACR Project GENIE and 324 patients in an independent dataset INOVATe were analysed. Cases where somatic variants could be distinguished from germline variants were included, and analysis was restricted to those with a somatic TP53 variant, to ensure cases were HGSC. RESULTS: Of 1210 patients in GENIE, 27% (n = 325) were aged ≥70 years at testing. Patients with somatic-only PVs in BRCA2 were older compared with BRCA1 (median 71 vs 60 years, p = 0.002). Median age for 21 patients with somatic-only PVs in 11 other HR-related genes ranged from 40 to 67 years. In older patients, 7% (n = 22) had somatic BRCA1/2 PVs, and 1% (n = 2) had PVs other HR-related genes; this rate was not significantly different to younger patients (<70 years), 7% (n = 62) BRCA1/2 and 2% (n = 19) other HR-related genes (p = 0.36). The overall frequency of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs was similar in INOVATe (n = 25; 7.7%) and somatic-only BRCA2 PVs were again found in older patients compared with BRCA1 (median age: at testing, 70 vs 63 years; at diagnosis, 68 vs 60 years). CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of somatic-only PVs in HR-related genes was similar in older and younger patients with HGSC, highlighting the importance of somatic testing irrespective of age. Limiting somatic testing by age may exclude patients who could benefit from maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99715492023-03-01 Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma Pitiyarachchi, Omali Lee, Yeh Chen Sim, Hao-Wen Srirangan, Sivatharsny Mapagu, Cristina Kirk, Judy Harnett, Paul R. Balleine, Rosemary L. Bowtell, David D.L. Samimi, Goli Brand, Alison H. Marsh, Deborah J. Beale, Philip Anderson, Lyndal Bouantoun, Natalie Provan, Pamela Ramus, Susan J. DeFazio, Anna Friedlander, Michael Transl Oncol Commentary BACKGROUND: Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients. METHODS: Data from 1210 HGSC patients in AACR Project GENIE and 324 patients in an independent dataset INOVATe were analysed. Cases where somatic variants could be distinguished from germline variants were included, and analysis was restricted to those with a somatic TP53 variant, to ensure cases were HGSC. RESULTS: Of 1210 patients in GENIE, 27% (n = 325) were aged ≥70 years at testing. Patients with somatic-only PVs in BRCA2 were older compared with BRCA1 (median 71 vs 60 years, p = 0.002). Median age for 21 patients with somatic-only PVs in 11 other HR-related genes ranged from 40 to 67 years. In older patients, 7% (n = 22) had somatic BRCA1/2 PVs, and 1% (n = 2) had PVs other HR-related genes; this rate was not significantly different to younger patients (<70 years), 7% (n = 62) BRCA1/2 and 2% (n = 19) other HR-related genes (p = 0.36). The overall frequency of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs was similar in INOVATe (n = 25; 7.7%) and somatic-only BRCA2 PVs were again found in older patients compared with BRCA1 (median age: at testing, 70 vs 63 years; at diagnosis, 68 vs 60 years). CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of somatic-only PVs in HR-related genes was similar in older and younger patients with HGSC, highlighting the importance of somatic testing irrespective of age. Limiting somatic testing by age may exclude patients who could benefit from maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Neoplasia Press 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9971549/ /pubmed/36805919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101638 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Pitiyarachchi, Omali
Lee, Yeh Chen
Sim, Hao-Wen
Srirangan, Sivatharsny
Mapagu, Cristina
Kirk, Judy
Harnett, Paul R.
Balleine, Rosemary L.
Bowtell, David D.L.
Samimi, Goli
Brand, Alison H.
Marsh, Deborah J.
Beale, Philip
Anderson, Lyndal
Bouantoun, Natalie
Provan, Pamela
Ramus, Susan J.
DeFazio, Anna
Friedlander, Michael
Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title_full Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title_fullStr Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title_short Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
title_sort older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination dna repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101638
work_keys_str_mv AT pitiyarachchiomali olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT leeyehchen olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT simhaowen olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT srirangansivatharsny olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT mapagucristina olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT kirkjudy olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT harnettpaulr olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT balleinerosemaryl olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT bowtelldaviddl olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT samimigoli olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT brandalisonh olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT marshdeborahj olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT bealephilip olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT andersonlyndal olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT bouantounnatalie olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT provanpamela olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT ramussusanj olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT defazioanna olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma
AT friedlandermichael olderageshouldnotbeabarriertotestingforsomaticvariantsinhomologousrecombinationdnarepairrelatedgenesinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinoma