Cargando…

Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: For many years, practitioners have been encountered with dental rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Among many of alternatives, free iliac graft can be a reasonable and also problematic choice to be accomplished. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirani, Gholamreza, Hashemi Nasab, Mahboubeh, Bashiri, Shahryar, Kordi, Sheida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864991
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90184.1474
_version_ 1784898133448196096
author Shirani, Gholamreza
Hashemi Nasab, Mahboubeh
Bashiri, Shahryar
Kordi, Sheida
author_facet Shirani, Gholamreza
Hashemi Nasab, Mahboubeh
Bashiri, Shahryar
Kordi, Sheida
author_sort Shirani, Gholamreza
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: For many years, practitioners have been encountered with dental rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Among many of alternatives, free iliac graft can be a reasonable and also problematic choice to be accomplished. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survival rate and bone loss in implants inserted in reconstructed jaws with free iliac graft. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this clinical trial study, twelve patients that underwent bone reconstruction with free iliac graft were included in this retrospective study. The patients underwent surgery over a 6-year period from September 2011 to July 2017. Panoramic images were taken immediately after implant insertion and at the follow-up session. The parameters that were assessed included implant survival rate, bone level changes, and surrounding tissue conditions. RESULTS: One hundred and nine implants were placed in eight female and four male patients, of which 65 (59.6%) were inserted in the reconstructed maxilla and 44 (40.3%) in the reconstructed mandible. The interval between the reconstruction surgery and follow-up session was 28.75 months and the mean interval between implant insertion and the follow-up session was 21.75 months, ranging from 6 to 72 months. The total average of crestal bone resorption was 2.44 mm (range: 0 to 5.43 mm). CONCLUSION: This study found that rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants placed in free iliac graft was associated with acceptable marginal bone loss, survival rate, satisfaction, and esthetic results among the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99716052023-03-01 Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft Shirani, Gholamreza Hashemi Nasab, Mahboubeh Bashiri, Shahryar Kordi, Sheida J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: For many years, practitioners have been encountered with dental rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Among many of alternatives, free iliac graft can be a reasonable and also problematic choice to be accomplished. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survival rate and bone loss in implants inserted in reconstructed jaws with free iliac graft. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this clinical trial study, twelve patients that underwent bone reconstruction with free iliac graft were included in this retrospective study. The patients underwent surgery over a 6-year period from September 2011 to July 2017. Panoramic images were taken immediately after implant insertion and at the follow-up session. The parameters that were assessed included implant survival rate, bone level changes, and surrounding tissue conditions. RESULTS: One hundred and nine implants were placed in eight female and four male patients, of which 65 (59.6%) were inserted in the reconstructed maxilla and 44 (40.3%) in the reconstructed mandible. The interval between the reconstruction surgery and follow-up session was 28.75 months and the mean interval between implant insertion and the follow-up session was 21.75 months, ranging from 6 to 72 months. The total average of crestal bone resorption was 2.44 mm (range: 0 to 5.43 mm). CONCLUSION: This study found that rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants placed in free iliac graft was associated with acceptable marginal bone loss, survival rate, satisfaction, and esthetic results among the patients. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9971605/ /pubmed/36864991 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90184.1474 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits reusers to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if the original work is properly cited, and attribution is given to the creator. The license also permits for commercial use.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shirani, Gholamreza
Hashemi Nasab, Mahboubeh
Bashiri, Shahryar
Kordi, Sheida
Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title_full Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title_fullStr Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title_full_unstemmed Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title_short Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft
title_sort survival rate and cervical bone loss of dental implants placed in regenerated areas with free iliac graft
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864991
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90184.1474
work_keys_str_mv AT shiranigholamreza survivalrateandcervicalbonelossofdentalimplantsplacedinregeneratedareaswithfreeiliacgraft
AT hasheminasabmahboubeh survivalrateandcervicalbonelossofdentalimplantsplacedinregeneratedareaswithfreeiliacgraft
AT bashirishahryar survivalrateandcervicalbonelossofdentalimplantsplacedinregeneratedareaswithfreeiliacgraft
AT kordisheida survivalrateandcervicalbonelossofdentalimplantsplacedinregeneratedareaswithfreeiliacgraft