Cargando…

The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study

Objectives: ‘Field of view (FOV) size’ affects the quality of radiographic images and the radiation dose received by patients. In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) FOV should be selected according to therapeutic purposes. While aiming for the highest diagnostic image quality, the radiation dose s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niktash, Anoosheh, Mehralizadeh, Sandra, Talaeipour, Ahmadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865948
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i32.10804
_version_ 1784898142348509184
author Niktash, Anoosheh
Mehralizadeh, Sandra
Talaeipour, Ahmadreza
author_facet Niktash, Anoosheh
Mehralizadeh, Sandra
Talaeipour, Ahmadreza
author_sort Niktash, Anoosheh
collection PubMed
description Objectives: ‘Field of view (FOV) size’ affects the quality of radiographic images and the radiation dose received by patients. In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) FOV should be selected according to therapeutic purposes. While aiming for the highest diagnostic image quality, the radiation dose should be kept to a minimum to reduce the risk for patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different sizes of FOV on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in five different CBCT units. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, CBCT scans were taken from a dried human mandible containing a resin block fixed to the lingual cortex and a resin ring was used to simulate soft tissue during scans. Five CBCT units including, NewTom VGi, NewTom GiANO, Soredex SCANORA 3D, Planmeca ProMax, and Asahi Alphard 3030 were evaluated. Each unit had 3 to 5 different FOVs. Images were obtained and analyzed with ImageJ software and CNR was calculated in each image. ANOVA and T-test were used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Comparison among different FOVs of each unit showed significant CNR reductions in small FOVs (P<0.05). Similar FOV sizes of different CBCT devices were also compared and demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: A direct relationship between FOV size and CNR was observed in all five CBCT units, but differences in exposure parameters of these units led to variable CNR in FOVs with similar sizes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99716462023-03-01 The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study Niktash, Anoosheh Mehralizadeh, Sandra Talaeipour, Ahmadreza Front Dent Original Article Objectives: ‘Field of view (FOV) size’ affects the quality of radiographic images and the radiation dose received by patients. In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) FOV should be selected according to therapeutic purposes. While aiming for the highest diagnostic image quality, the radiation dose should be kept to a minimum to reduce the risk for patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different sizes of FOV on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in five different CBCT units. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, CBCT scans were taken from a dried human mandible containing a resin block fixed to the lingual cortex and a resin ring was used to simulate soft tissue during scans. Five CBCT units including, NewTom VGi, NewTom GiANO, Soredex SCANORA 3D, Planmeca ProMax, and Asahi Alphard 3030 were evaluated. Each unit had 3 to 5 different FOVs. Images were obtained and analyzed with ImageJ software and CNR was calculated in each image. ANOVA and T-test were used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Comparison among different FOVs of each unit showed significant CNR reductions in small FOVs (P<0.05). Similar FOV sizes of different CBCT devices were also compared and demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: A direct relationship between FOV size and CNR was observed in all five CBCT units, but differences in exposure parameters of these units led to variable CNR in FOVs with similar sizes. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9971646/ /pubmed/36865948 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i32.10804 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Niktash, Anoosheh
Mehralizadeh, Sandra
Talaeipour, Ahmadreza
The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title_full The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title_short The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study
title_sort effect of different field of view sizes on contrast-to-noise ratio of cone-beam computed tomography units: an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865948
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i32.10804
work_keys_str_mv AT niktashanoosheh theeffectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy
AT mehralizadehsandra theeffectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy
AT talaeipourahmadreza theeffectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy
AT niktashanoosheh effectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy
AT mehralizadehsandra effectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy
AT talaeipourahmadreza effectofdifferentfieldofviewsizesoncontrasttonoiseratioofconebeamcomputedtomographyunitsaninvitrostudy