Cargando…

Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghiani, Alessandro, Tsitouras, Konstantinos, Paderewska, Joanna, Kahnert, Kathrin, Walcher, Swenja, Gernhold, Lukas, Neurohr, Claus, Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231155744
_version_ 1784898154787766272
author Ghiani, Alessandro
Tsitouras, Konstantinos
Paderewska, Joanna
Kahnert, Kathrin
Walcher, Swenja
Gernhold, Lukas
Neurohr, Claus
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
author_facet Ghiani, Alessandro
Tsitouras, Konstantinos
Paderewska, Joanna
Kahnert, Kathrin
Walcher, Swenja
Gernhold, Lukas
Neurohr, Claus
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
author_sort Ghiani, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dead-space fraction) or mechanical power (MP; affected, e.g., by changes in lung-thorax compliance). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate VR and MP in the late stages of the disease when patients are ready to be liberated from the ventilator after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia compared to respiratory failures of other etiologies. DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study of 249 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients with and without COVID-19-related respiratory failure. METHODS: We analyzed each group’s VR and MP distributions and trajectories [repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)] during weaning. Secondary outcomes included weaning failure rates between groups and the ability of VR and MP to predict weaning outcomes (using logistic regression models). RESULTS: The analysis compared 53 COVID-19 cases with a heterogeneous group of 196 non-COVID-19 subjects. VR and MP decreased across both groups during weaning. COVID-19 patients demonstrated higher values for both indexes throughout weaning: median VR 1.54 versus 1.27 (p < 0.01) and MP 26.0 versus 21.3 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at the start of weaning, and median VR 1.38 versus 1.24 (p < 0.01) and MP 24.2 versus 20.1 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at weaning completion. According to the multivariable analysis, VR was not independently associated with weaning outcomes, and the ability of MP to predict weaning failure or success varied with lung-thorax compliance, with COVID-19 patients demonstrating consistently higher dynamic compliance along with significantly fewer weaning failures (9% versus 30%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients differed considerably in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics among prolonged ventilated individuals, demonstrating significantly higher VRs and MP. The differences in MP were linked with higher lung-thorax compliance in COVID-19 patients, possibly contributing to the lower rate of weaning failures observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99717052023-02-28 Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies Ghiani, Alessandro Tsitouras, Konstantinos Paderewska, Joanna Kahnert, Kathrin Walcher, Swenja Gernhold, Lukas Neurohr, Claus Kneidinger, Nikolaus Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dead-space fraction) or mechanical power (MP; affected, e.g., by changes in lung-thorax compliance). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate VR and MP in the late stages of the disease when patients are ready to be liberated from the ventilator after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia compared to respiratory failures of other etiologies. DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study of 249 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients with and without COVID-19-related respiratory failure. METHODS: We analyzed each group’s VR and MP distributions and trajectories [repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)] during weaning. Secondary outcomes included weaning failure rates between groups and the ability of VR and MP to predict weaning outcomes (using logistic regression models). RESULTS: The analysis compared 53 COVID-19 cases with a heterogeneous group of 196 non-COVID-19 subjects. VR and MP decreased across both groups during weaning. COVID-19 patients demonstrated higher values for both indexes throughout weaning: median VR 1.54 versus 1.27 (p < 0.01) and MP 26.0 versus 21.3 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at the start of weaning, and median VR 1.38 versus 1.24 (p < 0.01) and MP 24.2 versus 20.1 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at weaning completion. According to the multivariable analysis, VR was not independently associated with weaning outcomes, and the ability of MP to predict weaning failure or success varied with lung-thorax compliance, with COVID-19 patients demonstrating consistently higher dynamic compliance along with significantly fewer weaning failures (9% versus 30%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients differed considerably in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics among prolonged ventilated individuals, demonstrating significantly higher VRs and MP. The differences in MP were linked with higher lung-thorax compliance in COVID-19 patients, possibly contributing to the lower rate of weaning failures observed. SAGE Publications 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9971705/ /pubmed/36846917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231155744 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ghiani, Alessandro
Tsitouras, Konstantinos
Paderewska, Joanna
Kahnert, Kathrin
Walcher, Swenja
Gernhold, Lukas
Neurohr, Claus
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title_full Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title_fullStr Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title_full_unstemmed Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title_short Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
title_sort ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated covid-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231155744
work_keys_str_mv AT ghianialessandro ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT tsitouraskonstantinos ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT paderewskajoanna ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT kahnertkathrin ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT walcherswenja ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT gernholdlukas ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT neurohrclaus ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies
AT kneidingernikolaus ventilatoryratioandmechanicalpowerinprolongedmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsversusrespiratoryfailuresofotheretiologies