Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) is a common skin condition that presents as infraorbital darkening. POH has a multifactorial etiology. Studies evaluating POH treatment are several with varying satisfaction results. OBJECTIVES: To compare carboxytherapy and microneedling (MN) combined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assaf, Hanan A., Ahmed, Dina, Abdelhamed, Amr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865870
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_394_21
_version_ 1784898166206758912
author Assaf, Hanan A.
Ahmed, Dina
Abdelhamed, Amr
author_facet Assaf, Hanan A.
Ahmed, Dina
Abdelhamed, Amr
author_sort Assaf, Hanan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) is a common skin condition that presents as infraorbital darkening. POH has a multifactorial etiology. Studies evaluating POH treatment are several with varying satisfaction results. OBJECTIVES: To compare carboxytherapy and microneedling (MN) combined with topical glutathione for POH treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A split-face pilot clinical trial was conducted on 31 female patients with POH. Carboxytherapy injection was done at the right periorbital area, and MN with topical glutathione (Left periorbital area), for 6 biweekly sessions. Visual analogue scale (VAS), dermoscopic evaluation, patient satisfaction, and patient dermatology life quality index questionnaire (DLQI), safety evaluation were done with 3 months follow up. The trial registry number is NCT04389788. RESULTS: Carboxytherapy showed a higher significant improvement as regards VAS evaluation compared to MN with glutathione during the active treatment phase (P = 0.001) and during the follow-up phase (P = 0.006). Also, the dermoscopic evaluation showed a statistically significant improvement in the Carboxytherapy group. DLQI showed a statistically significant improvement (P <.001). As regards patient satisfaction, carboxytherapy showed in comparison to MN with glutathione (80.6% vs 25.8% in moderate satisfaction) and (3.2% vs 0% in marked satisfaction respectively) (P = .05). As regards the patients' safety, there was no significant difference between both eyes (P = .23). CONCLUSIONS: Carboxytherapy showed higher efficacy than MN with glutathione in POH patients. Carboxytherapy improved clinical, dermoscopic, patient satisfaction, and patient DLQI; with a good safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99717522023-03-01 Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial Assaf, Hanan A. Ahmed, Dina Abdelhamed, Amr Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) is a common skin condition that presents as infraorbital darkening. POH has a multifactorial etiology. Studies evaluating POH treatment are several with varying satisfaction results. OBJECTIVES: To compare carboxytherapy and microneedling (MN) combined with topical glutathione for POH treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A split-face pilot clinical trial was conducted on 31 female patients with POH. Carboxytherapy injection was done at the right periorbital area, and MN with topical glutathione (Left periorbital area), for 6 biweekly sessions. Visual analogue scale (VAS), dermoscopic evaluation, patient satisfaction, and patient dermatology life quality index questionnaire (DLQI), safety evaluation were done with 3 months follow up. The trial registry number is NCT04389788. RESULTS: Carboxytherapy showed a higher significant improvement as regards VAS evaluation compared to MN with glutathione during the active treatment phase (P = 0.001) and during the follow-up phase (P = 0.006). Also, the dermoscopic evaluation showed a statistically significant improvement in the Carboxytherapy group. DLQI showed a statistically significant improvement (P <.001). As regards patient satisfaction, carboxytherapy showed in comparison to MN with glutathione (80.6% vs 25.8% in moderate satisfaction) and (3.2% vs 0% in marked satisfaction respectively) (P = .05). As regards the patients' safety, there was no significant difference between both eyes (P = .23). CONCLUSIONS: Carboxytherapy showed higher efficacy than MN with glutathione in POH patients. Carboxytherapy improved clinical, dermoscopic, patient satisfaction, and patient DLQI; with a good safety profile. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9971752/ /pubmed/36865870 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_394_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Dermatology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Assaf, Hanan A.
Ahmed, Dina
Abdelhamed, Amr
Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Carboxytherapy versus Combined Microneedling with Topical Glutathione in the Treatment of Patients with Periorbital Hyperpigmentation: An Evaluator-Blind, Split-Face, Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of carboxytherapy versus combined microneedling with topical glutathione in the treatment of patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation: an evaluator-blind, split-face, controlled pilot clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865870
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_394_21
work_keys_str_mv AT assafhanana efficacyandsafetyofcarboxytherapyversuscombinedmicroneedlingwithtopicalglutathioneinthetreatmentofpatientswithperiorbitalhyperpigmentationanevaluatorblindsplitfacecontrolledpilotclinicaltrial
AT ahmeddina efficacyandsafetyofcarboxytherapyversuscombinedmicroneedlingwithtopicalglutathioneinthetreatmentofpatientswithperiorbitalhyperpigmentationanevaluatorblindsplitfacecontrolledpilotclinicaltrial
AT abdelhamedamr efficacyandsafetyofcarboxytherapyversuscombinedmicroneedlingwithtopicalglutathioneinthetreatmentofpatientswithperiorbitalhyperpigmentationanevaluatorblindsplitfacecontrolledpilotclinicaltrial