Cargando…

A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a method of placing the femoral fixation location for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) within a safe isometric area using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Using a pilot cadaveric specimen, the center of the radiographic safe isometric area for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamplot, Joseph D., Petit, Camryn B., Thompson, Dan, Xerogeanes, John W., Gonzalez, Felix M., Diekfuss, Jed A., Myer, Gregory D., Jimenez, Megan Lisset
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.11.017
_version_ 1784898199204397056
author Lamplot, Joseph D.
Petit, Camryn B.
Thompson, Dan
Xerogeanes, John W.
Gonzalez, Felix M.
Diekfuss, Jed A.
Myer, Gregory D.
Jimenez, Megan Lisset
author_facet Lamplot, Joseph D.
Petit, Camryn B.
Thompson, Dan
Xerogeanes, John W.
Gonzalez, Felix M.
Diekfuss, Jed A.
Myer, Gregory D.
Jimenez, Megan Lisset
author_sort Lamplot, Joseph D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a method of placing the femoral fixation location for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) within a safe isometric area using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Using a pilot cadaveric specimen, the center of the radiographic safe isometric area for femoral fixation of LET, defined as a 1 cm (proximal-distal) area located proximal to the metaphyseal flare and posterior to the posterior cortical extension line (PCEL), was located using fluoroscopy and found to be 20 mm directly proximal to the center of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) origin. Using 10 additional specimens, the center of the FCL origin and a location 20 mm directly proximal was identified. K-wires were placed at each location. A lateral radiograph was obtained, and distances of the proximal K-wire relative to the PCEL and metaphyseal flare were measured. The location of the proximal K-wire relative to the radiographic safe isometric area was assessed by 2 independent observers. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was calculated for all measurements using intraclass coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: There was excellent intrarater and inter-rater reliability for all radiographic measurements (.908 to .975 and .968 to .988, respectively). In 5/10 specimens, the proximal K-wire was outside of the radiographic safe isometric area, with 4/5 anterior to the PCEL. Overall, the mean distance from the PCEL was 1 mm ± 4 mm (anterior), and the mean distance from the metaphyseal flare was 7.4 mm ± 2.9 mm (proximal). CONCLUSION: A landmark-based technique referencing the FCL origin was inaccurate in the placement of femoral fixation within a radiographic safe isometric area for LET. Therefore intraoperative imaging should be considered to ensure accurate placement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may help to decrease the likelihood of misplacement of femoral fixation during LET by showing that landmark-based methods without intraoperative image guidance may be unreliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99718922023-03-01 A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate Lamplot, Joseph D. Petit, Camryn B. Thompson, Dan Xerogeanes, John W. Gonzalez, Felix M. Diekfuss, Jed A. Myer, Gregory D. Jimenez, Megan Lisset Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a method of placing the femoral fixation location for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) within a safe isometric area using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Using a pilot cadaveric specimen, the center of the radiographic safe isometric area for femoral fixation of LET, defined as a 1 cm (proximal-distal) area located proximal to the metaphyseal flare and posterior to the posterior cortical extension line (PCEL), was located using fluoroscopy and found to be 20 mm directly proximal to the center of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) origin. Using 10 additional specimens, the center of the FCL origin and a location 20 mm directly proximal was identified. K-wires were placed at each location. A lateral radiograph was obtained, and distances of the proximal K-wire relative to the PCEL and metaphyseal flare were measured. The location of the proximal K-wire relative to the radiographic safe isometric area was assessed by 2 independent observers. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was calculated for all measurements using intraclass coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: There was excellent intrarater and inter-rater reliability for all radiographic measurements (.908 to .975 and .968 to .988, respectively). In 5/10 specimens, the proximal K-wire was outside of the radiographic safe isometric area, with 4/5 anterior to the PCEL. Overall, the mean distance from the PCEL was 1 mm ± 4 mm (anterior), and the mean distance from the metaphyseal flare was 7.4 mm ± 2.9 mm (proximal). CONCLUSION: A landmark-based technique referencing the FCL origin was inaccurate in the placement of femoral fixation within a radiographic safe isometric area for LET. Therefore intraoperative imaging should be considered to ensure accurate placement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may help to decrease the likelihood of misplacement of femoral fixation during LET by showing that landmark-based methods without intraoperative image guidance may be unreliable. Elsevier 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9971892/ /pubmed/36866313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.11.017 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lamplot, Joseph D.
Petit, Camryn B.
Thompson, Dan
Xerogeanes, John W.
Gonzalez, Felix M.
Diekfuss, Jed A.
Myer, Gregory D.
Jimenez, Megan Lisset
A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title_full A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title_fullStr A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title_full_unstemmed A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title_short A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate
title_sort landmark-based technique for determining an isometric femoral attachment site for lateral extraarticular tenodesis is inaccurate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.11.017
work_keys_str_mv AT lamplotjosephd alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT petitcamrynb alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT thompsondan alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT xerogeanesjohnw alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT gonzalezfelixm alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT diekfussjeda alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT myergregoryd alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT jimenezmeganlisset alandmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT lamplotjosephd landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT petitcamrynb landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT thompsondan landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT xerogeanesjohnw landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT gonzalezfelixm landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT diekfussjeda landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT myergregoryd landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate
AT jimenezmeganlisset landmarkbasedtechniquefordetermininganisometricfemoralattachmentsiteforlateralextraarticulartenodesisisinaccurate