Cargando…

CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets

Under the leadership of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40), approximately 1100 global cities have signed to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Accurate greenhouse gas emission calculations at the city-scale have become critical. This study forms a bridge between the two emission calculatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, D Y, Goldberg, D L, Coombes, Toby, Kleiman, Gary, Anenberg, S C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acbb91
_version_ 1784898212686987264
author Ahn, D Y
Goldberg, D L
Coombes, Toby
Kleiman, Gary
Anenberg, S C
author_facet Ahn, D Y
Goldberg, D L
Coombes, Toby
Kleiman, Gary
Anenberg, S C
author_sort Ahn, D Y
collection PubMed
description Under the leadership of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40), approximately 1100 global cities have signed to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Accurate greenhouse gas emission calculations at the city-scale have become critical. This study forms a bridge between the two emission calculation methods: (a) the city-scale accounting used by C40 cities—the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) and (b) the global-scale gridded datasets used by the research community—the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) and Open‐Source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO(2) (ODIAC). For the emission magnitudes of 78 C40 cities, we find good correlations between the GPC and EDGAR (R (2) = 0.80) and the GPC and ODIAC (R (2) = 0.72). Regionally, African cities show the largest variability in the three emission estimates. For the emission trends, the standard deviation of the differences is ±4.7% yr(−1) for EDGAR vs. GPC and is ±3.9% yr(−1) for ODIAC vs. GPC: a factor of ∼2 larger than the trends that many C40 cities pledged (net-zero by 2050 from 2010, or −2.5% yr(−1)). To examine the source of discrepancies in the emission datasets, we assess the impact of spatial resolutions of EDGAR (0.1°) and ODIAC (1 km) on estimating varying-sized cities’ emissions. Our analysis shows that the coarser resolution of EDGAR can artificially decrease emissions by 13% for cities smaller than 1000 km(2). We find that data quality of emission factors (EFs) used in GPC inventories vary regionally: the highest quality for European and North American and the lowest for African and Latin American cities. Our study indicates that the following items should be prioritized to reduce the discrepancies between the two emission calculation methods: (a) implementing local-specific/up-to-date EFs in GPC inventories, (b) keeping the global power plant database current, and (c) incorporating satellite-derived CO(2) datasets (i.e. NASA OCO-3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9971945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99719452023-03-01 CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets Ahn, D Y Goldberg, D L Coombes, Toby Kleiman, Gary Anenberg, S C Environ Res Lett Letter Under the leadership of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40), approximately 1100 global cities have signed to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Accurate greenhouse gas emission calculations at the city-scale have become critical. This study forms a bridge between the two emission calculation methods: (a) the city-scale accounting used by C40 cities—the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) and (b) the global-scale gridded datasets used by the research community—the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) and Open‐Source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO(2) (ODIAC). For the emission magnitudes of 78 C40 cities, we find good correlations between the GPC and EDGAR (R (2) = 0.80) and the GPC and ODIAC (R (2) = 0.72). Regionally, African cities show the largest variability in the three emission estimates. For the emission trends, the standard deviation of the differences is ±4.7% yr(−1) for EDGAR vs. GPC and is ±3.9% yr(−1) for ODIAC vs. GPC: a factor of ∼2 larger than the trends that many C40 cities pledged (net-zero by 2050 from 2010, or −2.5% yr(−1)). To examine the source of discrepancies in the emission datasets, we assess the impact of spatial resolutions of EDGAR (0.1°) and ODIAC (1 km) on estimating varying-sized cities’ emissions. Our analysis shows that the coarser resolution of EDGAR can artificially decrease emissions by 13% for cities smaller than 1000 km(2). We find that data quality of emission factors (EFs) used in GPC inventories vary regionally: the highest quality for European and North American and the lowest for African and Latin American cities. Our study indicates that the following items should be prioritized to reduce the discrepancies between the two emission calculation methods: (a) implementing local-specific/up-to-date EFs in GPC inventories, (b) keeping the global power plant database current, and (c) incorporating satellite-derived CO(2) datasets (i.e. NASA OCO-3). IOP Publishing 2023-03-01 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9971945/ /pubmed/36873100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acbb91 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Letter
Ahn, D Y
Goldberg, D L
Coombes, Toby
Kleiman, Gary
Anenberg, S C
CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title_full CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title_fullStr CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title_full_unstemmed CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title_short CO(2) emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
title_sort co(2) emissions from c40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acbb91
work_keys_str_mv AT ahndy co2emissionsfromc40citiescitywideemissioninventoriesandcomparisonswithglobalgriddedemissiondatasets
AT goldbergdl co2emissionsfromc40citiescitywideemissioninventoriesandcomparisonswithglobalgriddedemissiondatasets
AT coombestoby co2emissionsfromc40citiescitywideemissioninventoriesandcomparisonswithglobalgriddedemissiondatasets
AT kleimangary co2emissionsfromc40citiescitywideemissioninventoriesandcomparisonswithglobalgriddedemissiondatasets
AT anenbergsc co2emissionsfromc40citiescitywideemissioninventoriesandcomparisonswithglobalgriddedemissiondatasets