Cargando…
The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305 |
_version_ | 1784898259151486976 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yan Ren, Mudan Jia, Ai Zhang, Juan Wang, Shuying Zhao, Qian Cai, Guohong He, Shuixiang |
author_facet | Zhao, Yan Ren, Mudan Jia, Ai Zhang, Juan Wang, Shuying Zhao, Qian Cai, Guohong He, Shuixiang |
author_sort | Zhao, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of the gastrointestinal lesions examined under EUS and their pathology were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The accuracy of EUS for detecting intramucosal lesions and subepithelial lesions (SELs) were 83.6% and 91.4%, respectively. One hundred and ninety‐four (73.5%) lesions originated from the mucous layer, as determined by pre‐operation EUS examinations. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the correct T stage for intramucosal lesions in the gastric region, esophagus, and colorectum was 77%, 71.8%, and 84.6%, respectively. According to the Paris endoscopic classification, the distribution of macroscopic patterns was different between the EUS‐pathology conformity and nonconformity groups (p = 0.018). In the nonconformity group, 48.6% of erosive lesions were classified as 0‐IIc, 0‐IIa + IIc, 0‐IIc + IIa or 0‐III macroscopic patterns compared with 26% patients in the conformity group (p = 0.025). Univariate analyses demonstrated that ulcerative lesions (OR = 7.516, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.574–21.952, p < 0.001), location at the cardia of the stomach (OR = 3.619, 95%CI 1.076–12.168, p = 0.038), malignant tumor (OR = 2.920, 95%CI 1.339–6.368, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with EUS inaccuracy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that ulcer was an independent risk factor associated with EUS inaccuracy, with odds ratios of 5.094 (95% CI: 1.641–15.807, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that EUS is a reliable and easy‐to‐use diagnostic tool in decision‐making regarding appropriate endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS appeared questionable in the presence of ulceration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9972141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99721412023-03-01 The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors Zhao, Yan Ren, Mudan Jia, Ai Zhang, Juan Wang, Shuying Zhao, Qian Cai, Guohong He, Shuixiang Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of the gastrointestinal lesions examined under EUS and their pathology were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The accuracy of EUS for detecting intramucosal lesions and subepithelial lesions (SELs) were 83.6% and 91.4%, respectively. One hundred and ninety‐four (73.5%) lesions originated from the mucous layer, as determined by pre‐operation EUS examinations. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the correct T stage for intramucosal lesions in the gastric region, esophagus, and colorectum was 77%, 71.8%, and 84.6%, respectively. According to the Paris endoscopic classification, the distribution of macroscopic patterns was different between the EUS‐pathology conformity and nonconformity groups (p = 0.018). In the nonconformity group, 48.6% of erosive lesions were classified as 0‐IIc, 0‐IIa + IIc, 0‐IIc + IIa or 0‐III macroscopic patterns compared with 26% patients in the conformity group (p = 0.025). Univariate analyses demonstrated that ulcerative lesions (OR = 7.516, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.574–21.952, p < 0.001), location at the cardia of the stomach (OR = 3.619, 95%CI 1.076–12.168, p = 0.038), malignant tumor (OR = 2.920, 95%CI 1.339–6.368, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with EUS inaccuracy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that ulcer was an independent risk factor associated with EUS inaccuracy, with odds ratios of 5.094 (95% CI: 1.641–15.807, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that EUS is a reliable and easy‐to‐use diagnostic tool in decision‐making regarding appropriate endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS appeared questionable in the presence of ulceration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9972141/ /pubmed/36177606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Zhao, Yan Ren, Mudan Jia, Ai Zhang, Juan Wang, Shuying Zhao, Qian Cai, Guohong He, Shuixiang The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title | The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title_full | The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title_fullStr | The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title_short | The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
title_sort | factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT renmudan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT jiaai thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT zhangjuan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT wangshuying thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT zhaoqian thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT caiguohong thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT heshuixiang thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT zhaoyan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT renmudan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT jiaai factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT zhangjuan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT wangshuying factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT zhaoqian factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT caiguohong factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors AT heshuixiang factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors |