Cargando…

The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yan, Ren, Mudan, Jia, Ai, Zhang, Juan, Wang, Shuying, Zhao, Qian, Cai, Guohong, He, Shuixiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305
_version_ 1784898259151486976
author Zhao, Yan
Ren, Mudan
Jia, Ai
Zhang, Juan
Wang, Shuying
Zhao, Qian
Cai, Guohong
He, Shuixiang
author_facet Zhao, Yan
Ren, Mudan
Jia, Ai
Zhang, Juan
Wang, Shuying
Zhao, Qian
Cai, Guohong
He, Shuixiang
author_sort Zhao, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of the gastrointestinal lesions examined under EUS and their pathology were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The accuracy of EUS for detecting intramucosal lesions and subepithelial lesions (SELs) were 83.6% and 91.4%, respectively. One hundred and ninety‐four (73.5%) lesions originated from the mucous layer, as determined by pre‐operation EUS examinations. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the correct T stage for intramucosal lesions in the gastric region, esophagus, and colorectum was 77%, 71.8%, and 84.6%, respectively. According to the Paris endoscopic classification, the distribution of macroscopic patterns was different between the EUS‐pathology conformity and nonconformity groups (p = 0.018). In the nonconformity group, 48.6% of erosive lesions were classified as 0‐IIc, 0‐IIa + IIc, 0‐IIc + IIa or 0‐III macroscopic patterns compared with 26% patients in the conformity group (p = 0.025). Univariate analyses demonstrated that ulcerative lesions (OR = 7.516, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.574–21.952, p < 0.001), location at the cardia of the stomach (OR = 3.619, 95%CI 1.076–12.168, p = 0.038), malignant tumor (OR = 2.920, 95%CI 1.339–6.368, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with EUS inaccuracy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that ulcer was an independent risk factor associated with EUS inaccuracy, with odds ratios of 5.094 (95% CI: 1.641–15.807, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that EUS is a reliable and easy‐to‐use diagnostic tool in decision‐making regarding appropriate endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS appeared questionable in the presence of ulceration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9972141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99721412023-03-01 The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors Zhao, Yan Ren, Mudan Jia, Ai Zhang, Juan Wang, Shuying Zhao, Qian Cai, Guohong He, Shuixiang Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) as a preoperative assessment for gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A total of 261 patients with 264 gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in the study. The parameters of the gastrointestinal lesions examined under EUS and their pathology were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The accuracy of EUS for detecting intramucosal lesions and subepithelial lesions (SELs) were 83.6% and 91.4%, respectively. One hundred and ninety‐four (73.5%) lesions originated from the mucous layer, as determined by pre‐operation EUS examinations. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the correct T stage for intramucosal lesions in the gastric region, esophagus, and colorectum was 77%, 71.8%, and 84.6%, respectively. According to the Paris endoscopic classification, the distribution of macroscopic patterns was different between the EUS‐pathology conformity and nonconformity groups (p = 0.018). In the nonconformity group, 48.6% of erosive lesions were classified as 0‐IIc, 0‐IIa + IIc, 0‐IIc + IIa or 0‐III macroscopic patterns compared with 26% patients in the conformity group (p = 0.025). Univariate analyses demonstrated that ulcerative lesions (OR = 7.516, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.574–21.952, p < 0.001), location at the cardia of the stomach (OR = 3.619, 95%CI 1.076–12.168, p = 0.038), malignant tumor (OR = 2.920, 95%CI 1.339–6.368, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with EUS inaccuracy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that ulcer was an independent risk factor associated with EUS inaccuracy, with odds ratios of 5.094 (95% CI: 1.641–15.807, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that EUS is a reliable and easy‐to‐use diagnostic tool in decision‐making regarding appropriate endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS appeared questionable in the presence of ulceration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9972141/ /pubmed/36177606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Zhao, Yan
Ren, Mudan
Jia, Ai
Zhang, Juan
Wang, Shuying
Zhao, Qian
Cai, Guohong
He, Shuixiang
The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title_full The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title_fullStr The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title_full_unstemmed The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title_short The factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
title_sort factors influencing the accuracy of pre‐operative endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in endoscopic treatments for gastrointestinal tumors
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5305
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT renmudan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT jiaai thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT zhangjuan thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT wangshuying thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT zhaoqian thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT caiguohong thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT heshuixiang thefactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT zhaoyan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT renmudan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT jiaai factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT zhangjuan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT wangshuying factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT zhaoqian factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT caiguohong factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors
AT heshuixiang factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasonographyassessmentinendoscopictreatmentsforgastrointestinaltumors