Cargando…

Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elgafy, Hossein, Lempert, Nathaniel, Stirton, Jacob, Zak, Peter, Semaan, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568221997076
_version_ 1784898283168071680
author Elgafy, Hossein
Lempert, Nathaniel
Stirton, Jacob
Zak, Peter
Semaan, Hassan
author_facet Elgafy, Hossein
Lempert, Nathaniel
Stirton, Jacob
Zak, Peter
Semaan, Hassan
author_sort Elgafy, Hossein
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%) and 12 women (40%), with a mean age 52 years (range 34- 68). Fibular allograft was prepared by cutting it into longitudinal strips 50 mm in length. Three allograft struts were inserted into the screw track. Six mm tap used to tap between the 3 fibular struts. Eight- or 9-mm diameter, and 45 or 50 mm in length screw was then inserted. The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain for clinical outcome. Computed tomography scan (CT) performed at 12 months postoperative visit to assess fibular graft incorporation along the pedicle screw track, any screw loosening and the interbody as well as posterolateral fusion. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 29 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. CT scan obtained at last follow-up showed incorporation of fibular allograft and solid fusion in all patients except one. CONCLUSION: The fibular allograft augmentation of the pedicle screw track in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss is a viable option. It allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface and has some key advantages when compared to currently available methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9972260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99722602023-03-01 Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation Elgafy, Hossein Lempert, Nathaniel Stirton, Jacob Zak, Peter Semaan, Hassan Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%) and 12 women (40%), with a mean age 52 years (range 34- 68). Fibular allograft was prepared by cutting it into longitudinal strips 50 mm in length. Three allograft struts were inserted into the screw track. Six mm tap used to tap between the 3 fibular struts. Eight- or 9-mm diameter, and 45 or 50 mm in length screw was then inserted. The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain for clinical outcome. Computed tomography scan (CT) performed at 12 months postoperative visit to assess fibular graft incorporation along the pedicle screw track, any screw loosening and the interbody as well as posterolateral fusion. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 29 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. CT scan obtained at last follow-up showed incorporation of fibular allograft and solid fusion in all patients except one. CONCLUSION: The fibular allograft augmentation of the pedicle screw track in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss is a viable option. It allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface and has some key advantages when compared to currently available methods. SAGE Publications 2021-02-25 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9972260/ /pubmed/33626945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568221997076 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elgafy, Hossein
Lempert, Nathaniel
Stirton, Jacob
Zak, Peter
Semaan, Hassan
Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title_full Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title_fullStr Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title_short Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation
title_sort pedicle screw track augmentation with fibular allograft for significant bone loss in revision fixation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568221997076
work_keys_str_mv AT elgafyhossein pediclescrewtrackaugmentationwithfibularallograftforsignificantbonelossinrevisionfixation
AT lempertnathaniel pediclescrewtrackaugmentationwithfibularallograftforsignificantbonelossinrevisionfixation
AT stirtonjacob pediclescrewtrackaugmentationwithfibularallograftforsignificantbonelossinrevisionfixation
AT zakpeter pediclescrewtrackaugmentationwithfibularallograftforsignificantbonelossinrevisionfixation
AT semaanhassan pediclescrewtrackaugmentationwithfibularallograftforsignificantbonelossinrevisionfixation