Cargando…
Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177 |
_version_ | 1784898313307291648 |
---|---|
author | Pera, Óscar Martínez, Álvaro Möhler, Christian Hamans, Bob Vega, Fernando Barral, Fernando Becerra, Nuria Jimenez, Rafael Fernandez-Velilla, Enric Quera, Jaume Algara, Manuel |
author_facet | Pera, Óscar Martínez, Álvaro Möhler, Christian Hamans, Bob Vega, Fernando Barral, Fernando Becerra, Nuria Jimenez, Rafael Fernandez-Velilla, Enric Quera, Jaume Algara, Manuel |
author_sort | Pera, Óscar |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation therapy workflow, reducing the time required for segmentation. The purpose of this article is to validate the deep learning–based autocontouring solution integrated in syngo.via RT Image Suite VB40 (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this purpose, we have used our own specific qualitative classification system, RANK, to evaluate more than 600 contours corresponding to 18 different automatically delineated organs at risk. Computed tomography data sets of 95 different patients were included: 30 patients with lung, 30 patients with breast, and 35 male patients with pelvic cancer. The automatically generated structures were reviewed in the Eclipse Contouring module independently by 3 observers: an expert physician, an expert technician, and a junior physician. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference between the Dice coefficient associated with RANK 4 compared with the coefficient associated with RANKs 2 and 3 (P < .001). In total, 64% of the evaluated structures received the maximum score, 4. Only 1% of the structures were classified with the lowest score, 1. The time savings for breast, thorax, and pelvis were 87.6%, 93.5%, and 82.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Siemens’ syngo.via RT Image Suite offers good autocontouring results and significant time savings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9972393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99723932023-03-01 Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System Pera, Óscar Martínez, Álvaro Möhler, Christian Hamans, Bob Vega, Fernando Barral, Fernando Becerra, Nuria Jimenez, Rafael Fernandez-Velilla, Enric Quera, Jaume Algara, Manuel Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation therapy workflow, reducing the time required for segmentation. The purpose of this article is to validate the deep learning–based autocontouring solution integrated in syngo.via RT Image Suite VB40 (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this purpose, we have used our own specific qualitative classification system, RANK, to evaluate more than 600 contours corresponding to 18 different automatically delineated organs at risk. Computed tomography data sets of 95 different patients were included: 30 patients with lung, 30 patients with breast, and 35 male patients with pelvic cancer. The automatically generated structures were reviewed in the Eclipse Contouring module independently by 3 observers: an expert physician, an expert technician, and a junior physician. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference between the Dice coefficient associated with RANK 4 compared with the coefficient associated with RANKs 2 and 3 (P < .001). In total, 64% of the evaluated structures received the maximum score, 4. Only 1% of the structures were classified with the lowest score, 1. The time savings for breast, thorax, and pelvis were 87.6%, 93.5%, and 82.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Siemens’ syngo.via RT Image Suite offers good autocontouring results and significant time savings. Elsevier 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9972393/ /pubmed/36865668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Pera, Óscar Martínez, Álvaro Möhler, Christian Hamans, Bob Vega, Fernando Barral, Fernando Becerra, Nuria Jimenez, Rafael Fernandez-Velilla, Enric Quera, Jaume Algara, Manuel Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title | Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title_full | Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title_short | Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System |
title_sort | clinical validation of siemens’ syngo.via automatic contouring system |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peraoscar clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT martinezalvaro clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT mohlerchristian clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT hamansbob clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT vegafernando clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT barralfernando clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT becerranuria clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT jimenezrafael clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT fernandezvelillaenric clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT querajaume clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem AT algaramanuel clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem |