Cargando…

Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System

PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pera, Óscar, Martínez, Álvaro, Möhler, Christian, Hamans, Bob, Vega, Fernando, Barral, Fernando, Becerra, Nuria, Jimenez, Rafael, Fernandez-Velilla, Enric, Quera, Jaume, Algara, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177
_version_ 1784898313307291648
author Pera, Óscar
Martínez, Álvaro
Möhler, Christian
Hamans, Bob
Vega, Fernando
Barral, Fernando
Becerra, Nuria
Jimenez, Rafael
Fernandez-Velilla, Enric
Quera, Jaume
Algara, Manuel
author_facet Pera, Óscar
Martínez, Álvaro
Möhler, Christian
Hamans, Bob
Vega, Fernando
Barral, Fernando
Becerra, Nuria
Jimenez, Rafael
Fernandez-Velilla, Enric
Quera, Jaume
Algara, Manuel
author_sort Pera, Óscar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation therapy workflow, reducing the time required for segmentation. The purpose of this article is to validate the deep learning–based autocontouring solution integrated in syngo.via RT Image Suite VB40 (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this purpose, we have used our own specific qualitative classification system, RANK, to evaluate more than 600 contours corresponding to 18 different automatically delineated organs at risk. Computed tomography data sets of 95 different patients were included: 30 patients with lung, 30 patients with breast, and 35 male patients with pelvic cancer. The automatically generated structures were reviewed in the Eclipse Contouring module independently by 3 observers: an expert physician, an expert technician, and a junior physician. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference between the Dice coefficient associated with RANK 4 compared with the coefficient associated with RANKs 2 and 3 (P < .001). In total, 64% of the evaluated structures received the maximum score, 4. Only 1% of the structures were classified with the lowest score, 1. The time savings for breast, thorax, and pelvis were 87.6%, 93.5%, and 82.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Siemens’ syngo.via RT Image Suite offers good autocontouring results and significant time savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9972393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99723932023-03-01 Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System Pera, Óscar Martínez, Álvaro Möhler, Christian Hamans, Bob Vega, Fernando Barral, Fernando Becerra, Nuria Jimenez, Rafael Fernandez-Velilla, Enric Quera, Jaume Algara, Manuel Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The manual delineation of organs at risk is a process that requires a great deal of time both for the technician and for the physician. Availability of validated software tools assisted by artificial intelligence would be of great benefit, as it would significantly improve the radiation therapy workflow, reducing the time required for segmentation. The purpose of this article is to validate the deep learning–based autocontouring solution integrated in syngo.via RT Image Suite VB40 (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this purpose, we have used our own specific qualitative classification system, RANK, to evaluate more than 600 contours corresponding to 18 different automatically delineated organs at risk. Computed tomography data sets of 95 different patients were included: 30 patients with lung, 30 patients with breast, and 35 male patients with pelvic cancer. The automatically generated structures were reviewed in the Eclipse Contouring module independently by 3 observers: an expert physician, an expert technician, and a junior physician. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference between the Dice coefficient associated with RANK 4 compared with the coefficient associated with RANKs 2 and 3 (P < .001). In total, 64% of the evaluated structures received the maximum score, 4. Only 1% of the structures were classified with the lowest score, 1. The time savings for breast, thorax, and pelvis were 87.6%, 93.5%, and 82.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Siemens’ syngo.via RT Image Suite offers good autocontouring results and significant time savings. Elsevier 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9972393/ /pubmed/36865668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Pera, Óscar
Martínez, Álvaro
Möhler, Christian
Hamans, Bob
Vega, Fernando
Barral, Fernando
Becerra, Nuria
Jimenez, Rafael
Fernandez-Velilla, Enric
Quera, Jaume
Algara, Manuel
Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title_full Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title_short Clinical Validation of Siemens’ Syngo.via Automatic Contouring System
title_sort clinical validation of siemens’ syngo.via automatic contouring system
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101177
work_keys_str_mv AT peraoscar clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT martinezalvaro clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT mohlerchristian clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT hamansbob clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT vegafernando clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT barralfernando clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT becerranuria clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT jimenezrafael clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT fernandezvelillaenric clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT querajaume clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem
AT algaramanuel clinicalvalidationofsiemenssyngoviaautomaticcontouringsystem