Cargando…

National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patient outcomes is well established, with better outcomes when delivery meets recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess how well Australian practice aligns with national CR guidelines for exercise assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollings, Matthew, Mavros, Yorgi, Freeston, Jonathan, Fiatarone Singh, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468
_version_ 1784898327012179968
author Hollings, Matthew
Mavros, Yorgi
Freeston, Jonathan
Fiatarone Singh, Maria
author_facet Hollings, Matthew
Mavros, Yorgi
Freeston, Jonathan
Fiatarone Singh, Maria
author_sort Hollings, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patient outcomes is well established, with better outcomes when delivery meets recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess how well Australian practice aligns with national CR guidelines for exercise assessment and prescription. METHOD: This cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all 475 publicly listed CR services in Australia and consisted of four sections: (1) Programme and client demographics, (2) aerobic exercise characteristics, (3) resistance exercise characteristics and (4) pre-exercise assessment, exercise testing and progression. RESULTS: In total, 228 (54%) survey responses were received. Only three of five Australian guideline recommendations were consistently reported to be followed in current CR programmes: assessment of physical function prior to exercise (91%), prescription of light-moderate exercise intensity (76%) and review of referring physician results (75%). Remaining guidelines were commonly not implemented. For example, only 58% of services reported an initial assessment of resting ECG/heart rate, and only 58% reported the concurrent prescription of both aerobic and resistance exercise, which may have been influenced by equipment availability (p<0.05). Exercise-specific assessments such as muscular strength (18%) and aerobic fitness (13%) were uncommonly reported, although both were more frequent in metropolitan services (p<0.05) or when an exercise physiologist was present (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant deficits in national CR guideline implementation are common, potentially influenced by location, exercise supervisor and equipment availability. Key deficiencies include the lack of concurrent aerobic and resistance exercise prescription and infrequent assessment of important physiological outcomes including resting heart rate, muscular strength and aerobic fitness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9972448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99724482023-03-01 National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice? Hollings, Matthew Mavros, Yorgi Freeston, Jonathan Fiatarone Singh, Maria BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patient outcomes is well established, with better outcomes when delivery meets recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess how well Australian practice aligns with national CR guidelines for exercise assessment and prescription. METHOD: This cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all 475 publicly listed CR services in Australia and consisted of four sections: (1) Programme and client demographics, (2) aerobic exercise characteristics, (3) resistance exercise characteristics and (4) pre-exercise assessment, exercise testing and progression. RESULTS: In total, 228 (54%) survey responses were received. Only three of five Australian guideline recommendations were consistently reported to be followed in current CR programmes: assessment of physical function prior to exercise (91%), prescription of light-moderate exercise intensity (76%) and review of referring physician results (75%). Remaining guidelines were commonly not implemented. For example, only 58% of services reported an initial assessment of resting ECG/heart rate, and only 58% reported the concurrent prescription of both aerobic and resistance exercise, which may have been influenced by equipment availability (p<0.05). Exercise-specific assessments such as muscular strength (18%) and aerobic fitness (13%) were uncommonly reported, although both were more frequent in metropolitan services (p<0.05) or when an exercise physiologist was present (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant deficits in national CR guideline implementation are common, potentially influenced by location, exercise supervisor and equipment availability. Key deficiencies include the lack of concurrent aerobic and resistance exercise prescription and infrequent assessment of important physiological outcomes including resting heart rate, muscular strength and aerobic fitness. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9972448/ /pubmed/36865770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hollings, Matthew
Mavros, Yorgi
Freeston, Jonathan
Fiatarone Singh, Maria
National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title_full National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title_fullStr National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title_full_unstemmed National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title_short National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
title_sort national survey of australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468
work_keys_str_mv AT hollingsmatthew nationalsurveyofaustraliancardiacrehabilitationprogrammesdoescurrentexerciseprogrammingadheretoevidencebasedguidelinesandbestpractice
AT mavrosyorgi nationalsurveyofaustraliancardiacrehabilitationprogrammesdoescurrentexerciseprogrammingadheretoevidencebasedguidelinesandbestpractice
AT freestonjonathan nationalsurveyofaustraliancardiacrehabilitationprogrammesdoescurrentexerciseprogrammingadheretoevidencebasedguidelinesandbestpractice
AT fiataronesinghmaria nationalsurveyofaustraliancardiacrehabilitationprogrammesdoescurrentexerciseprogrammingadheretoevidencebasedguidelinesandbestpractice