Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Effective way to prevent mesial drift after the early loss of primary first molars is by inserting a durable space maintainer. Several space maintainers are available; fixed nonfunctional (FNF) space maintainer (crown and loop) is commonly used when abutment teeth need ful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sathyaprasad, Savitha, Krishnareddy, Monika Godilli, Vinod, Vinisha, Das, Nikhil, Ramesh, R, Ilyas, Irfana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2478
_version_ 1784898438193741824
author Sathyaprasad, Savitha
Krishnareddy, Monika Godilli
Vinod, Vinisha
Das, Nikhil
Ramesh, R
Ilyas, Irfana
author_facet Sathyaprasad, Savitha
Krishnareddy, Monika Godilli
Vinod, Vinisha
Das, Nikhil
Ramesh, R
Ilyas, Irfana
author_sort Sathyaprasad, Savitha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Effective way to prevent mesial drift after the early loss of primary first molars is by inserting a durable space maintainer. Several space maintainers are available; fixed nonfunctional (FNF) space maintainer (crown and loop) is commonly used when abutment teeth need full-coronal restoration. Disadvantages of crown and loop space maintainer are nonfunctional, nonesthetic, and fracture of solder loop. To overcome this drawback, new design of fixed functional cantilever (FFC) space maintainer (crown and pontic) using bis-acrly composite resin. The study evaluated the longevity and acceptance of an FFC and compared it with a FNF space maintainer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 healthy children, aged 6–9 years, were selected having bilateral premature loss of lower deciduous first molars. FFC space maintainer in one quadrant and FNF space maintainer in the other was cemented. The subject's acceptance of treatment was checked using a visual analog scale after the treatment completion. Criteria for complication leading to the failure was assessed in both the designs in the 3rd, 6th, and 9th month. Cumulative success longevity was obtained at a 9 month evaluation. RESULTS: Patient acceptability was greater in group I (FFC) in comparison to group II (FNF). In group I, fracture of the crown and pontic was the common complication leading to failure, followed by attrition of the crown and loss of material due to abrasion. In group II, fracture of the solder joint was the common complication leading to failure, followed by slippage of the loop gingivally and cement loss. The longevity of groups I and II were 70 and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FFC can be considered a viable alternative to conventional FNF space maintainers. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sathyaprasad S, Krishnareddy MG, Vinod V, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):750-760.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9973074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99730742023-03-01 Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial Sathyaprasad, Savitha Krishnareddy, Monika Godilli Vinod, Vinisha Das, Nikhil Ramesh, R Ilyas, Irfana Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Effective way to prevent mesial drift after the early loss of primary first molars is by inserting a durable space maintainer. Several space maintainers are available; fixed nonfunctional (FNF) space maintainer (crown and loop) is commonly used when abutment teeth need full-coronal restoration. Disadvantages of crown and loop space maintainer are nonfunctional, nonesthetic, and fracture of solder loop. To overcome this drawback, new design of fixed functional cantilever (FFC) space maintainer (crown and pontic) using bis-acrly composite resin. The study evaluated the longevity and acceptance of an FFC and compared it with a FNF space maintainer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 healthy children, aged 6–9 years, were selected having bilateral premature loss of lower deciduous first molars. FFC space maintainer in one quadrant and FNF space maintainer in the other was cemented. The subject's acceptance of treatment was checked using a visual analog scale after the treatment completion. Criteria for complication leading to the failure was assessed in both the designs in the 3rd, 6th, and 9th month. Cumulative success longevity was obtained at a 9 month evaluation. RESULTS: Patient acceptability was greater in group I (FFC) in comparison to group II (FNF). In group I, fracture of the crown and pontic was the common complication leading to failure, followed by attrition of the crown and loss of material due to abrasion. In group II, fracture of the solder joint was the common complication leading to failure, followed by slippage of the loop gingivally and cement loss. The longevity of groups I and II were 70 and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FFC can be considered a viable alternative to conventional FNF space maintainers. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sathyaprasad S, Krishnareddy MG, Vinod V, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):750-760. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9973074/ /pubmed/36866140 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2478 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sathyaprasad, Savitha
Krishnareddy, Monika Godilli
Vinod, Vinisha
Das, Nikhil
Ramesh, R
Ilyas, Irfana
Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Functional Cantilever Space Maintainer and Fixed Nonfunctional Space Maintainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of fixed functional cantilever space maintainer and fixed nonfunctional space maintainer: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2478
work_keys_str_mv AT sathyaprasadsavitha comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krishnareddymonikagodilli comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vinodvinisha comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dasnikhil comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rameshr comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ilyasirfana comparativeevaluationoffixedfunctionalcantileverspacemaintainerandfixednonfunctionalspacemaintainerarandomizedcontrolledtrial