Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children

AIM: The present in vivo study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and survival rate of resin-based composite sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, Irvine, California, United States of America) with high viscosity glass ionomer (GI) (Equia Forte, GC India, Patancheru, Telangana, India) u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaverikana, Kiran, Vojjala, Bhargavi, Subramaniam, Priya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866139
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2450
_version_ 1784898443316035584
author Kaverikana, Kiran
Vojjala, Bhargavi
Subramaniam, Priya
author_facet Kaverikana, Kiran
Vojjala, Bhargavi
Subramaniam, Priya
author_sort Kaverikana, Kiran
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present in vivo study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and survival rate of resin-based composite sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, Irvine, California, United States of America) with high viscosity glass ionomer (GI) (Equia Forte, GC India, Patancheru, Telangana, India) using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealant protocol in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design of the study was a clinical, prospective split-mouth study. A total of 100 contralateral primary molars were selected and divided into two groups. In group I, children received Equia Forte, and in group II, children received Clinpro Sealant. The follow-up examinations were performed in the 1st and 6th months. Simonsen's criteria were used to check for retention. International Caries Assessment and Detection System II (ICDAS II) criteria were used to check for dental caries. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to retention and caries preventive effect. CONCLUSIONS: High-viscosity GI sealants can be applied using the ART protocol and provide an alternative to resin-based sealants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is a limited number of studies on the performance of ART sealants in primary molars. Thus, the clinical efficacy and survival rate of resin-based composite sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, Irvine, California, United States of America) with high viscosity GI (Equia Forte, GC India, Patancheru, Telangana, India) using ART sealant protocol in primary molars were evaluated. The research concluded that high-viscosity GI sealants using ART protocol are effective sealants in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kaverikana K, Vojjala B, Subramaniam P. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):724-728.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9973092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99730922023-03-01 Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children Kaverikana, Kiran Vojjala, Bhargavi Subramaniam, Priya Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The present in vivo study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and survival rate of resin-based composite sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, Irvine, California, United States of America) with high viscosity glass ionomer (GI) (Equia Forte, GC India, Patancheru, Telangana, India) using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealant protocol in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design of the study was a clinical, prospective split-mouth study. A total of 100 contralateral primary molars were selected and divided into two groups. In group I, children received Equia Forte, and in group II, children received Clinpro Sealant. The follow-up examinations were performed in the 1st and 6th months. Simonsen's criteria were used to check for retention. International Caries Assessment and Detection System II (ICDAS II) criteria were used to check for dental caries. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to retention and caries preventive effect. CONCLUSIONS: High-viscosity GI sealants can be applied using the ART protocol and provide an alternative to resin-based sealants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is a limited number of studies on the performance of ART sealants in primary molars. Thus, the clinical efficacy and survival rate of resin-based composite sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE, Irvine, California, United States of America) with high viscosity GI (Equia Forte, GC India, Patancheru, Telangana, India) using ART sealant protocol in primary molars were evaluated. The research concluded that high-viscosity GI sealants using ART protocol are effective sealants in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kaverikana K, Vojjala B, Subramaniam P. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):724-728. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9973092/ /pubmed/36866139 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2450 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kaverikana, Kiran
Vojjala, Bhargavi
Subramaniam, Priya
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title_full Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title_short Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children
title_sort comparison of clinical efficacy of glass ionomer-based sealant using art protocol and resin-based sealant on primary molars in children
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866139
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2450
work_keys_str_mv AT kaverikanakiran comparisonofclinicalefficacyofglassionomerbasedsealantusingartprotocolandresinbasedsealantonprimarymolarsinchildren
AT vojjalabhargavi comparisonofclinicalefficacyofglassionomerbasedsealantusingartprotocolandresinbasedsealantonprimarymolarsinchildren
AT subramaniampriya comparisonofclinicalefficacyofglassionomerbasedsealantusingartprotocolandresinbasedsealantonprimarymolarsinchildren