Cargando…

An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soneta, Sanjana P, Hugar, Shivayogi M, Hallikerimath, Seema, Joshi, Riddhi S, Dialani, Pooja K, Kohli, Neha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865732
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435
_version_ 1784898448760242176
author Soneta, Sanjana P
Hugar, Shivayogi M
Hallikerimath, Seema
Joshi, Riddhi S
Dialani, Pooja K
Kohli, Neha
author_facet Soneta, Sanjana P
Hugar, Shivayogi M
Hallikerimath, Seema
Joshi, Riddhi S
Dialani, Pooja K
Kohli, Neha
author_sort Soneta, Sanjana P
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 children of age 6–12 years with mixed dentition were selected and divided into group I (control group n = 30): posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and group II (experimental group n = 30): glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material. Restorative treatment was carried out using these two materials. Retention of the material and salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus species count was estimated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The collected data were statistically analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0 Chicago, Illinois, USA) RESULTS: About 100% retention of glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material, and 90% retention of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement was observed according to United State Public Health Criteria. The * signifies statistically significant results, i.e. p < 0.0001 reduction in salivary S. mutans colony count and Lactobacillus species colony count was seen in both groups at different time intervals. CONCLUSION: Both the materials showed good antibacterial properties, but glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative showed better retention, that is, 100% when compared to posterior high strength glass ionomer cement, which showed 90% retention at the end of 6 months follow-up. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Soneta SP, Hugar SM, Hallikerimath S, et al. An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):529-534.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9973112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99731122023-03-01 An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study Soneta, Sanjana P Hugar, Shivayogi M Hallikerimath, Seema Joshi, Riddhi S Dialani, Pooja K Kohli, Neha Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 children of age 6–12 years with mixed dentition were selected and divided into group I (control group n = 30): posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and group II (experimental group n = 30): glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material. Restorative treatment was carried out using these two materials. Retention of the material and salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus species count was estimated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The collected data were statistically analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0 Chicago, Illinois, USA) RESULTS: About 100% retention of glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material, and 90% retention of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement was observed according to United State Public Health Criteria. The * signifies statistically significant results, i.e. p < 0.0001 reduction in salivary S. mutans colony count and Lactobacillus species colony count was seen in both groups at different time intervals. CONCLUSION: Both the materials showed good antibacterial properties, but glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative showed better retention, that is, 100% when compared to posterior high strength glass ionomer cement, which showed 90% retention at the end of 6 months follow-up. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Soneta SP, Hugar SM, Hallikerimath S, et al. An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):529-534. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9973112/ /pubmed/36865732 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Soneta, Sanjana P
Hugar, Shivayogi M
Hallikerimath, Seema
Joshi, Riddhi S
Dialani, Pooja K
Kohli, Neha
An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title_full An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title_short An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
title_sort in vivo evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition: a comparative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865732
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435
work_keys_str_mv AT sonetasanjanap aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT hugarshivayogim aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT hallikerimathseema aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT joshiriddhis aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT dialanipoojak aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT kohlineha aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT sonetasanjanap invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT hugarshivayogim invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT hallikerimathseema invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT joshiriddhis invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT dialanipoojak invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy
AT kohlineha invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy