Cargando…
An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865732 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435 |
_version_ | 1784898448760242176 |
---|---|
author | Soneta, Sanjana P Hugar, Shivayogi M Hallikerimath, Seema Joshi, Riddhi S Dialani, Pooja K Kohli, Neha |
author_facet | Soneta, Sanjana P Hugar, Shivayogi M Hallikerimath, Seema Joshi, Riddhi S Dialani, Pooja K Kohli, Neha |
author_sort | Soneta, Sanjana P |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 children of age 6–12 years with mixed dentition were selected and divided into group I (control group n = 30): posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and group II (experimental group n = 30): glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material. Restorative treatment was carried out using these two materials. Retention of the material and salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus species count was estimated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The collected data were statistically analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0 Chicago, Illinois, USA) RESULTS: About 100% retention of glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material, and 90% retention of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement was observed according to United State Public Health Criteria. The * signifies statistically significant results, i.e. p < 0.0001 reduction in salivary S. mutans colony count and Lactobacillus species colony count was seen in both groups at different time intervals. CONCLUSION: Both the materials showed good antibacterial properties, but glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative showed better retention, that is, 100% when compared to posterior high strength glass ionomer cement, which showed 90% retention at the end of 6 months follow-up. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Soneta SP, Hugar SM, Hallikerimath S, et al. An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):529-534. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9973112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99731122023-03-01 An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study Soneta, Sanjana P Hugar, Shivayogi M Hallikerimath, Seema Joshi, Riddhi S Dialani, Pooja K Kohli, Neha Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 children of age 6–12 years with mixed dentition were selected and divided into group I (control group n = 30): posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and group II (experimental group n = 30): glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material. Restorative treatment was carried out using these two materials. Retention of the material and salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus species count was estimated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The collected data were statistically analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0 Chicago, Illinois, USA) RESULTS: About 100% retention of glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material, and 90% retention of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement was observed according to United State Public Health Criteria. The * signifies statistically significant results, i.e. p < 0.0001 reduction in salivary S. mutans colony count and Lactobacillus species colony count was seen in both groups at different time intervals. CONCLUSION: Both the materials showed good antibacterial properties, but glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative showed better retention, that is, 100% when compared to posterior high strength glass ionomer cement, which showed 90% retention at the end of 6 months follow-up. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Soneta SP, Hugar SM, Hallikerimath S, et al. An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):529-534. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9973112/ /pubmed/36865732 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Soneta, Sanjana P Hugar, Shivayogi M Hallikerimath, Seema Joshi, Riddhi S Dialani, Pooja K Kohli, Neha An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title | An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title_full | An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title_short | An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | in vivo evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of posterior high strength glass ionomer cement and glass hybrid bulk-fill alkasite restorative material as conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition: a comparative study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36865732 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonetasanjanap aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT hugarshivayogim aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT hallikerimathseema aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT joshiriddhis aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT dialanipoojak aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT kohlineha aninvivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT sonetasanjanap invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT hugarshivayogim invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT hallikerimathseema invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT joshiriddhis invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT dialanipoojak invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy AT kohlineha invivoevaluationofretentionandantibacterialefficacyofposteriorhighstrengthglassionomercementandglasshybridbulkfillalkasiterestorativematerialasconservativeadhesiverestorationinchildrenwithmixeddentitionacomparativestudy |