Cargando…

Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)

This study is aimed at assessing the feeding frequency for tilapia fingerlings. 240 fishes were randomly distributed in 24 containers. The feeding consisted of six frequencies: 4 (F4), 5 (F5), 6 (F6), 7 (F7), 8 (F8), and 9 (F9) times a day. The weight gain was significantly higher in F5 and F6 when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fava, Aldo Felipe, de Souza Bezerra, Gildete, Neu, Dacley Hertes, Bittencourt, Fabio, Signor, Altevir, Carvalho, Kerolay Valadão, Gomes, Ricacio Luan Marques, Boscolo, Wilson Rogério
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1053556
_version_ 1784898458979663872
author Fava, Aldo Felipe
de Souza Bezerra, Gildete
Neu, Dacley Hertes
Bittencourt, Fabio
Signor, Altevir
Carvalho, Kerolay Valadão
Gomes, Ricacio Luan Marques
Boscolo, Wilson Rogério
author_facet Fava, Aldo Felipe
de Souza Bezerra, Gildete
Neu, Dacley Hertes
Bittencourt, Fabio
Signor, Altevir
Carvalho, Kerolay Valadão
Gomes, Ricacio Luan Marques
Boscolo, Wilson Rogério
author_sort Fava, Aldo Felipe
collection PubMed
description This study is aimed at assessing the feeding frequency for tilapia fingerlings. 240 fishes were randomly distributed in 24 containers. The feeding consisted of six frequencies: 4 (F4), 5 (F5), 6 (F6), 7 (F7), 8 (F8), and 9 (F9) times a day. The weight gain was significantly higher in F5 and F6 when compared to F4 (p = 0.0409 and 0.0306, respectively). Feed intake and apparent feed conversion did not differ between treatments (p = 0.129 and p = 0.451). About water quality, the nitrogen levels in the water from the treatments differed between F4 and F5 (p = 0.0478) and F4 and F6 (p = 0.0283) and for P between F4 and F6 (p = 0.0215) and F4 and F9 (p = 0.0432). The x(2) test showed a dependence relationship between feed frequencies and the muscle fibers frequency (p < 22 × 10(−17)), prevailing fibers between 10-20 micrometers in F4, F5, F6, and F7 and 30-40 in F8 and F9. The area of the hepatocytes differed only between F5 and F9, while the nucleus area did not. Partial net revenue differed in 10% between F5 and F4 (p = 0.0812) and between F6 and F4 (p = 0.0568). In conclusion, fingerlings fed 5 to 6 times a day have better zootechnical and partial recipes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9973146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99731462023-02-28 Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) Fava, Aldo Felipe de Souza Bezerra, Gildete Neu, Dacley Hertes Bittencourt, Fabio Signor, Altevir Carvalho, Kerolay Valadão Gomes, Ricacio Luan Marques Boscolo, Wilson Rogério Aquac Nutr Research Article This study is aimed at assessing the feeding frequency for tilapia fingerlings. 240 fishes were randomly distributed in 24 containers. The feeding consisted of six frequencies: 4 (F4), 5 (F5), 6 (F6), 7 (F7), 8 (F8), and 9 (F9) times a day. The weight gain was significantly higher in F5 and F6 when compared to F4 (p = 0.0409 and 0.0306, respectively). Feed intake and apparent feed conversion did not differ between treatments (p = 0.129 and p = 0.451). About water quality, the nitrogen levels in the water from the treatments differed between F4 and F5 (p = 0.0478) and F4 and F6 (p = 0.0283) and for P between F4 and F6 (p = 0.0215) and F4 and F9 (p = 0.0432). The x(2) test showed a dependence relationship between feed frequencies and the muscle fibers frequency (p < 22 × 10(−17)), prevailing fibers between 10-20 micrometers in F4, F5, F6, and F7 and 30-40 in F8 and F9. The area of the hepatocytes differed only between F5 and F9, while the nucleus area did not. Partial net revenue differed in 10% between F5 and F4 (p = 0.0812) and between F6 and F4 (p = 0.0568). In conclusion, fingerlings fed 5 to 6 times a day have better zootechnical and partial recipes. Hindawi 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9973146/ /pubmed/36860435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1053556 Text en Copyright © 2022 Aldo Felipe Fava et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fava, Aldo Felipe
de Souza Bezerra, Gildete
Neu, Dacley Hertes
Bittencourt, Fabio
Signor, Altevir
Carvalho, Kerolay Valadão
Gomes, Ricacio Luan Marques
Boscolo, Wilson Rogério
Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title_full Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title_fullStr Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title_short Effects of Feeding Frequency for Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus)
title_sort effects of feeding frequency for nile tilapia fingerlings (oreochromis niloticus)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1053556
work_keys_str_mv AT favaaldofelipe effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT desouzabezerragildete effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT neudacleyhertes effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT bittencourtfabio effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT signoraltevir effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT carvalhokerolayvaladao effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT gomesricacioluanmarques effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus
AT boscolowilsonrogerio effectsoffeedingfrequencyforniletilapiafingerlingsoreochromisniloticus