Cargando…

Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangiacavalli, Silvia, Cartia, Claudio Salvatore, Galli, Monica, Pezzatti, Sara, Belotti, Angelo, Fazio, Francesca, Mina, Roberto, Marcatti, Magda, Cafro, Anna, Zambello, Renato, Paris, Laura, Barilà, Gregorio, Olivares, Cecilia, Pompa, Alessandra, Mazza, Rita, Farina, Francesca, Soldarini, Martina, Benvenuti, Pietro, Pagani, Giuseppina, Palumbo, Michele, Masoni, Valeria, Ferretti, Virginia Valeria, Klersy, Catherine, Arcaini1, Luca, Petrucci, Maria Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36200419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.281342
Descripción
Sumario:Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In an attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd versus KRd was similar in terms of overall-response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, P=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, P=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.028). DaraRd was tolerated better, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, P<0.001). With the limitations of any retrospective analysis, our real-life PSM comparison between DaraRd and KRd, in first-relapse MM patients, showed better tolerability and prolonged PFS of DaraRd, although with some gaps of performance, in particular of DaraRd, with respect to RCT. Carfilzomib-containing regimens, like KRd, still remain a valid second-line option in the emerging scenario of first-line daratumumab-based therapy.