Cargando…

Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops

PURPOSE: Genomic techniques for characterizing the ocular microbiome require further validation. We compared the microbiome of patients’ eyelids through both conventional culture and 16S rRNA analysis and analyzed the impact of eyedrop use on microbiome diversity. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Priluck, Aaron, Ramulu, Pradeep, Dosto, Niccolo, Quigley, Harry, Abraham, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.2.32
_version_ 1784898545693753344
author Priluck, Aaron
Ramulu, Pradeep
Dosto, Niccolo
Quigley, Harry
Abraham, Alison
author_facet Priluck, Aaron
Ramulu, Pradeep
Dosto, Niccolo
Quigley, Harry
Abraham, Alison
author_sort Priluck, Aaron
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Genomic techniques for characterizing the ocular microbiome require further validation. We compared the microbiome of patients’ eyelids through both conventional culture and 16S rRNA analysis and analyzed the impact of eyedrop use on microbiome diversity. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients followed for management of glaucoma or suspicion of glaucoma had eyelid swabs performed with Isohelix MS Mini DNA Swabs (98 participants) and ESwabs (49 participants) for 16S rRNA analysis and conventional culture, respectively. The effect of preservative-containing eyedrops on the microbiomes detected using these two techniques were analyzed and compared across techniques. RESULTS: Forty-five of the 50 (non-unique) genera (90%) identified by conventional culture were also identified by each individual's 16S rRNA analysis within the top 14 most abundant organisms present based on operational taxonomic unit. All conventional cultures performed had at least one or more genera also identified by each participant's 16S rRNA analysis. There was no difference in the conventional culture positivity rate or proportion of participants with a particular genus present on conventional culture based on whether preservative-containing eyedrops were regularly used. Similarly, in eyes using versus not using eyedrops, no differences were observed in the proportions of participants with a particular genus present or the Shannon index as determined by 16S rRNA analysis. CONCLUSIONS: 16S rRNA analysis correlates well with conventional culture results for the eyelid microbiome, with results from neither technique demonstrating an association of microbiome composition and eyedrop use. The clinical relevance of the large numbers of microbes detected via 16S rRNA analysis requires further study. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: 16S rRNA analysis of the periocular microbiome is consistent with conventional culture and enables further study of physiologic and pathologic ocular processes possibly related to microbiome diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9973530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99735302023-03-01 Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops Priluck, Aaron Ramulu, Pradeep Dosto, Niccolo Quigley, Harry Abraham, Alison Transl Vis Sci Technol Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit PURPOSE: Genomic techniques for characterizing the ocular microbiome require further validation. We compared the microbiome of patients’ eyelids through both conventional culture and 16S rRNA analysis and analyzed the impact of eyedrop use on microbiome diversity. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients followed for management of glaucoma or suspicion of glaucoma had eyelid swabs performed with Isohelix MS Mini DNA Swabs (98 participants) and ESwabs (49 participants) for 16S rRNA analysis and conventional culture, respectively. The effect of preservative-containing eyedrops on the microbiomes detected using these two techniques were analyzed and compared across techniques. RESULTS: Forty-five of the 50 (non-unique) genera (90%) identified by conventional culture were also identified by each individual's 16S rRNA analysis within the top 14 most abundant organisms present based on operational taxonomic unit. All conventional cultures performed had at least one or more genera also identified by each participant's 16S rRNA analysis. There was no difference in the conventional culture positivity rate or proportion of participants with a particular genus present on conventional culture based on whether preservative-containing eyedrops were regularly used. Similarly, in eyes using versus not using eyedrops, no differences were observed in the proportions of participants with a particular genus present or the Shannon index as determined by 16S rRNA analysis. CONCLUSIONS: 16S rRNA analysis correlates well with conventional culture results for the eyelid microbiome, with results from neither technique demonstrating an association of microbiome composition and eyedrop use. The clinical relevance of the large numbers of microbes detected via 16S rRNA analysis requires further study. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: 16S rRNA analysis of the periocular microbiome is consistent with conventional culture and enables further study of physiologic and pathologic ocular processes possibly related to microbiome diversity. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9973530/ /pubmed/36826842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.2.32 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit
Priluck, Aaron
Ramulu, Pradeep
Dosto, Niccolo
Quigley, Harry
Abraham, Alison
Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title_full Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title_fullStr Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title_full_unstemmed Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title_short Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops
title_sort validation of 16s rrna gene sequencing of the periocular microbiome and lack of alteration by topical eyedrops
topic Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.2.32
work_keys_str_mv AT priluckaaron validationof16srrnagenesequencingoftheperiocularmicrobiomeandlackofalterationbytopicaleyedrops
AT ramulupradeep validationof16srrnagenesequencingoftheperiocularmicrobiomeandlackofalterationbytopicaleyedrops
AT dostoniccolo validationof16srrnagenesequencingoftheperiocularmicrobiomeandlackofalterationbytopicaleyedrops
AT quigleyharry validationof16srrnagenesequencingoftheperiocularmicrobiomeandlackofalterationbytopicaleyedrops
AT abrahamalison validationof16srrnagenesequencingoftheperiocularmicrobiomeandlackofalterationbytopicaleyedrops