Cargando…

Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction

Molecular genetic techniques are an effective monitoring tool, but high-quality DNA samples are usually required. In this study, we compared three different protocols of DNA extraction: NaCl (saline); phenol-chloroform and commercial kit (Promega)—from three biological tissues of five individuals of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutz, Ítalo, Miranda, Josy, Santana, Paula, Martins, Thais, Ferreira, Charles, Sampaio, Iracilda, Vallinoto, Marcelo, Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282369
_version_ 1784898671349858304
author Lutz, Ítalo
Miranda, Josy
Santana, Paula
Martins, Thais
Ferreira, Charles
Sampaio, Iracilda
Vallinoto, Marcelo
Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista
author_facet Lutz, Ítalo
Miranda, Josy
Santana, Paula
Martins, Thais
Ferreira, Charles
Sampaio, Iracilda
Vallinoto, Marcelo
Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista
author_sort Lutz, Ítalo
collection PubMed
description Molecular genetic techniques are an effective monitoring tool, but high-quality DNA samples are usually required. In this study, we compared three different protocols of DNA extraction: NaCl (saline); phenol-chloroform and commercial kit (Promega)—from three biological tissues of five individuals of Lutjanus purpureus under two methods of storage. The evaluated items included DNA concentration and purity, processing time and cost, as well as the obtaining of functional sequences. The highest average values of DNA concentration were obtained using the saline procedure and the commercial kit. Pure DNA was only obtained using the saline protocol, evaluated by the ratio of 260/280. The saline and phenol-chloroform protocols were the least expensive methods. The commercial kit costs are counterbalanced by the short time required. The procedure based on phenol-chloroform presented the worst results regarding DNA yield and the time required to perform all steps. The saline and commercial kit protocols showed similar results concerning the amount and quality of extracted DNA. Therefore, the final choice should be based on the available financial resources and the available time for carrying out each procedure of DNA extraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9974130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99741302023-03-01 Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction Lutz, Ítalo Miranda, Josy Santana, Paula Martins, Thais Ferreira, Charles Sampaio, Iracilda Vallinoto, Marcelo Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista PLoS One Research Article Molecular genetic techniques are an effective monitoring tool, but high-quality DNA samples are usually required. In this study, we compared three different protocols of DNA extraction: NaCl (saline); phenol-chloroform and commercial kit (Promega)—from three biological tissues of five individuals of Lutjanus purpureus under two methods of storage. The evaluated items included DNA concentration and purity, processing time and cost, as well as the obtaining of functional sequences. The highest average values of DNA concentration were obtained using the saline procedure and the commercial kit. Pure DNA was only obtained using the saline protocol, evaluated by the ratio of 260/280. The saline and phenol-chloroform protocols were the least expensive methods. The commercial kit costs are counterbalanced by the short time required. The procedure based on phenol-chloroform presented the worst results regarding DNA yield and the time required to perform all steps. The saline and commercial kit protocols showed similar results concerning the amount and quality of extracted DNA. Therefore, the final choice should be based on the available financial resources and the available time for carrying out each procedure of DNA extraction. Public Library of Science 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9974130/ /pubmed/36854012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282369 Text en © 2023 Lutz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lutz, Ítalo
Miranda, Josy
Santana, Paula
Martins, Thais
Ferreira, Charles
Sampaio, Iracilda
Vallinoto, Marcelo
Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista
Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title_full Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title_fullStr Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title_full_unstemmed Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title_short Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction
title_sort quality analysis of genomic dna and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of dna extraction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282369
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzitalo qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT mirandajosy qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT santanapaula qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT martinsthais qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT ferreiracharles qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT sampaioiracilda qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT vallinotomarcelo qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction
AT gomesgrazielleevangelista qualityanalysisofgenomicdnaandauthenticationoffisheriesproductsbasedondistinctmethodsofdnaextraction