Cargando…

Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: While the public is under serious pressure from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the final impact and possible contributing factors to postpartum depression symptoms (PPDS) remain unknown. Therefore, a meta-analysis to investigate the association between PPDS and the COVID-19 pan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoqian, Wang, Chun, Zuo, Xiaoli, Aertgeerts, Bert, Buntinx, Frank, Li, Tang, Vermandere, Mieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875385
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102618
_version_ 1784898837663449088
author Zhang, Xiaoqian
Wang, Chun
Zuo, Xiaoli
Aertgeerts, Bert
Buntinx, Frank
Li, Tang
Vermandere, Mieke
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoqian
Wang, Chun
Zuo, Xiaoli
Aertgeerts, Bert
Buntinx, Frank
Li, Tang
Vermandere, Mieke
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoqian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the public is under serious pressure from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the final impact and possible contributing factors to postpartum depression symptoms (PPDS) remain unknown. Therefore, a meta-analysis to investigate the association between PPDS and the COVID-19 pandemic was carried out by comparing the data between pre-pandemic and post-pandemic timeframes and exploring the influencing factors. METHODS: This systematic review was prospectively registered and recorded in a study protocol (Prospero CRD42022336820, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINALH, Cochrane and Scopus was cmpleted on June 6, 2022. Studies that compared the prevalence of PPD before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period were included. RESULTS: Of 1766 citations identified, 22 studies were included with 15,098 participates before the COVID-19 pandemic and 11,836 participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the analysis showed that the epidemic crisis was associated with an increased prevalence of PPDS (OR: 0.81 [0.68, 0.95], P = 0.009, I(2) = 59%). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the study characteristics and regions. Within the study characteristics classification, results showed an obvious increase in the prevalence of PPDS during the COVID-19 pandemic if PPDS cutoff was defined as Edinburgh postpartum depression score (EPDS) ≥13 points (OR: 0.72 [0.52, 0.98], P = 0.03, I(2) = 67%) and an increased prevalence in follow-ups that happened after 2 weeks (≥ 2 weeks postpartum) (OR: 0.81 [0.68, 0.97], P = 0.02, I(2) = 43%). Selected studies that were high-quality (OR: 0.79 [0.64, 0.97], P = 0.02, I(2) = 56%) demonstrated an increased prevalence of PPDS during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Sorting by regional factors, studies conducted in Asia (OR: 0.81 [0.70, 0.93], P = 0.003, I(2) = 0%) showed an increase of PPDS prevalence rates during the COVID-19 period, while studies conducted in Europe (OR: 0.82 [0.59, 1.13], P = 0.23, I(2) = 71%) and North America (OR: 0.66 [0.42, 1.02], P = 0.06, I(2) = 65%) showed no significant difference. All studies conducted in the developed (OR: 0.79 [0.64, 0.98], P = 0.03, I(2) = 65%) and developing countries (OR: 0.81 [0.69, 0.94], P = 0.007, I(2) = 0%) showed an increase of PPDS during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with an increased prevalence of PPDS, especially after long-term follow-up and among the group with a high possibility of depression. The negative influence from the pandemic, causing more PPDS was significant in studies from Asia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9975262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99752622023-03-02 Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Xiaoqian Wang, Chun Zuo, Xiaoli Aertgeerts, Bert Buntinx, Frank Li, Tang Vermandere, Mieke Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: While the public is under serious pressure from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the final impact and possible contributing factors to postpartum depression symptoms (PPDS) remain unknown. Therefore, a meta-analysis to investigate the association between PPDS and the COVID-19 pandemic was carried out by comparing the data between pre-pandemic and post-pandemic timeframes and exploring the influencing factors. METHODS: This systematic review was prospectively registered and recorded in a study protocol (Prospero CRD42022336820, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINALH, Cochrane and Scopus was cmpleted on June 6, 2022. Studies that compared the prevalence of PPD before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period were included. RESULTS: Of 1766 citations identified, 22 studies were included with 15,098 participates before the COVID-19 pandemic and 11,836 participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the analysis showed that the epidemic crisis was associated with an increased prevalence of PPDS (OR: 0.81 [0.68, 0.95], P = 0.009, I(2) = 59%). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the study characteristics and regions. Within the study characteristics classification, results showed an obvious increase in the prevalence of PPDS during the COVID-19 pandemic if PPDS cutoff was defined as Edinburgh postpartum depression score (EPDS) ≥13 points (OR: 0.72 [0.52, 0.98], P = 0.03, I(2) = 67%) and an increased prevalence in follow-ups that happened after 2 weeks (≥ 2 weeks postpartum) (OR: 0.81 [0.68, 0.97], P = 0.02, I(2) = 43%). Selected studies that were high-quality (OR: 0.79 [0.64, 0.97], P = 0.02, I(2) = 56%) demonstrated an increased prevalence of PPDS during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Sorting by regional factors, studies conducted in Asia (OR: 0.81 [0.70, 0.93], P = 0.003, I(2) = 0%) showed an increase of PPDS prevalence rates during the COVID-19 period, while studies conducted in Europe (OR: 0.82 [0.59, 1.13], P = 0.23, I(2) = 71%) and North America (OR: 0.66 [0.42, 1.02], P = 0.06, I(2) = 65%) showed no significant difference. All studies conducted in the developed (OR: 0.79 [0.64, 0.98], P = 0.03, I(2) = 65%) and developing countries (OR: 0.81 [0.69, 0.94], P = 0.007, I(2) = 0%) showed an increase of PPDS during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with an increased prevalence of PPDS, especially after long-term follow-up and among the group with a high possibility of depression. The negative influence from the pandemic, causing more PPDS was significant in studies from Asia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9975262/ /pubmed/36875385 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102618 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Wang, Zuo, Aertgeerts, Buntinx, Li and Vermandere. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zhang, Xiaoqian
Wang, Chun
Zuo, Xiaoli
Aertgeerts, Bert
Buntinx, Frank
Li, Tang
Vermandere, Mieke
Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort study characteristical and regional influences on postpartum depression before vs. during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36875385
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102618
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoqian studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchun studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zuoxiaoli studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aertgeertsbert studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT buntinxfrank studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT litang studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vermanderemieke studycharacteristicalandregionalinfluencesonpostpartumdepressionbeforevsduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis