Cargando…
Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge)
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the possibilities of artefact reduction using different anatomical implant positions with the Bonebridge bone-conduction hearing implant 602 for a patient with an acoustic neuroma requiring regular diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the tumour position....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122000494 |
_version_ | 1784898947616079872 |
---|---|
author | Edlinger, S Tenner, E Frühwald, J Sprinzl, G |
author_facet | Edlinger, S Tenner, E Frühwald, J Sprinzl, G |
author_sort | Edlinger, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the possibilities of artefact reduction using different anatomical implant positions with the Bonebridge bone-conduction hearing implant 602 for a patient with an acoustic neuroma requiring regular diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the tumour position. METHOD: Three implant positions and magnetic resonance imaging examinations with and without customised sequences for metal artefact suppression were investigated. The diagnostic usefulness was rated by a radiologist (qualitative evaluation), and the relation between the area of artefact and the total head area was calculated (quantitative evaluation). RESULTS: Following the qualitative analysis, the radiologist rated the superior to middle fossa implant placement significantly better for diagnostic purposes, which is in agreement with the calculated artefact ratio (p < 0.0001). The customised slice-encoding metal artifact correction view-angle tilting metal artifact reduction technique sequences significantly decreased the relative artefact area between 5.13 per cent and 25.02 per cent. The smallest mean artefact diameter was found for the superior to middle fossa position with 6.80 ± 1.30 cm (range: 5.42–9.74 cm; reduction of 18.65 per cent). CONCLUSION: The application of artefact reduction sequencing and special anatomical implant positioning allows regular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with the bone-conduction hearing implant 602 without sacrificing diagnostic imaging quality for tumour diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9975762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99757622023-03-02 Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) Edlinger, S Tenner, E Frühwald, J Sprinzl, G J Laryngol Otol Main Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the possibilities of artefact reduction using different anatomical implant positions with the Bonebridge bone-conduction hearing implant 602 for a patient with an acoustic neuroma requiring regular diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the tumour position. METHOD: Three implant positions and magnetic resonance imaging examinations with and without customised sequences for metal artefact suppression were investigated. The diagnostic usefulness was rated by a radiologist (qualitative evaluation), and the relation between the area of artefact and the total head area was calculated (quantitative evaluation). RESULTS: Following the qualitative analysis, the radiologist rated the superior to middle fossa implant placement significantly better for diagnostic purposes, which is in agreement with the calculated artefact ratio (p < 0.0001). The customised slice-encoding metal artifact correction view-angle tilting metal artifact reduction technique sequences significantly decreased the relative artefact area between 5.13 per cent and 25.02 per cent. The smallest mean artefact diameter was found for the superior to middle fossa position with 6.80 ± 1.30 cm (range: 5.42–9.74 cm; reduction of 18.65 per cent). CONCLUSION: The application of artefact reduction sequencing and special anatomical implant positioning allows regular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with the bone-conduction hearing implant 602 without sacrificing diagnostic imaging quality for tumour diagnosis. Cambridge University Press 2023-03 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9975762/ /pubmed/35144697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122000494 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Main Article Edlinger, S Tenner, E Frühwald, J Sprinzl, G Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title | Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title_full | Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title_short | Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) |
title_sort | comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (bonebridge) |
topic | Main Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122000494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edlingers comparisonofartefactreductionpossibilitieswiththenewactivetranscutaneousboneconductionimplantbonebridge AT tennere comparisonofartefactreductionpossibilitieswiththenewactivetranscutaneousboneconductionimplantbonebridge AT fruhwaldj comparisonofartefactreductionpossibilitieswiththenewactivetranscutaneousboneconductionimplantbonebridge AT sprinzlg comparisonofartefactreductionpossibilitieswiththenewactivetranscutaneousboneconductionimplantbonebridge |