Cargando…

Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS

Peter Roderick and Allyson Pollock's article, “Dismantling the National Health Service in England,” provides a history of the market incrementalism that has dominated UK government policy pertaining to the English National Health System (NHS), in recent decades. It also contains an analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benbow, David I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/27551938221148370
_version_ 1784898978246033408
author Benbow, David I.
author_facet Benbow, David I.
author_sort Benbow, David I.
collection PubMed
description Peter Roderick and Allyson Pollock's article, “Dismantling the National Health Service in England,” provides a history of the market incrementalism that has dominated UK government policy pertaining to the English National Health System (NHS), in recent decades. It also contains an analysis of the latest statute to reform the English NHS, namely the Health and Care Act 2022. It is often argued that the concerns—for example, about privatization—of those who critique neoliberal reforms to the English NHS are misplaced. I highlight that such neoliberal reforms have increased the proportion of the budget of the English NHS that is being diverted to private providers. Consequently, I aver that the term privatization accurately describes what has been occurring within the English NHS. I contend that the arguments of those who deny or downplay the privatization of the English NHS are indicative of some of the ideological strategies that the sociologist John B. Thompson identified. My commentary suggests that the concerns of critics of neoliberal reforms to the English NHS, such as Roderick and Pollock, are not misplaced and that more heed should be given to their analyses and warnings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9975900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99759002023-03-02 Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS Benbow, David I. Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv V. Neoliberalism in health services Peter Roderick and Allyson Pollock's article, “Dismantling the National Health Service in England,” provides a history of the market incrementalism that has dominated UK government policy pertaining to the English National Health System (NHS), in recent decades. It also contains an analysis of the latest statute to reform the English NHS, namely the Health and Care Act 2022. It is often argued that the concerns—for example, about privatization—of those who critique neoliberal reforms to the English NHS are misplaced. I highlight that such neoliberal reforms have increased the proportion of the budget of the English NHS that is being diverted to private providers. Consequently, I aver that the term privatization accurately describes what has been occurring within the English NHS. I contend that the arguments of those who deny or downplay the privatization of the English NHS are indicative of some of the ideological strategies that the sociologist John B. Thompson identified. My commentary suggests that the concerns of critics of neoliberal reforms to the English NHS, such as Roderick and Pollock, are not misplaced and that more heed should be given to their analyses and warnings. SAGE Publications 2023-01-04 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9975900/ /pubmed/36669499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/27551938221148370 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle V. Neoliberalism in health services
Benbow, David I.
Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title_full Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title_fullStr Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title_short Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS
title_sort commentary: the boy who cried wolf or cassandra? a consideration of the correct characterization of critics of neoliberal reforms to the english nhs
topic V. Neoliberalism in health services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/27551938221148370
work_keys_str_mv AT benbowdavidi commentarytheboywhocriedwolforcassandraaconsiderationofthecorrectcharacterizationofcriticsofneoliberalreformstotheenglishnhs