Cargando…
Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects’ self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856109 |
_version_ | 1784899013001084928 |
---|---|
author | Bilika, Paraskevi Paliouras, Achilleas Savvoulidou, Konstantina Arribas-Romano, Alberto Dimitriadis, Zacharias Billis, Evdokia Strimpakos, Nikolaos Kapreli, Eleni |
author_facet | Bilika, Paraskevi Paliouras, Achilleas Savvoulidou, Konstantina Arribas-Romano, Alberto Dimitriadis, Zacharias Billis, Evdokia Strimpakos, Nikolaos Kapreli, Eleni |
author_sort | Bilika, Paraskevi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects’ self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic review aimed to investigate the level of evidence for the psychometric properties of QST in healthy and patients with shoulder pain. Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until August 2021. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve studies were included for qualitative synthesis, which included three different tests (Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Temporal Summation (TS)). As the body of evidence consisted of studies of low methodological quality, the psychometric properties of PPT, CPM, and TS in healthy and patients with shoulder pain were classified as unknown. Although there is a risk that the conclusions may be ‘superficial’ in nature, the reliability seems to be nearly excellent for the PPT, however, the protocols’ variation and the low methodological quality of the studies do not allow for clear conclusions. Further studies are required for the CPM and TS in patients with shoulder pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99761782023-03-02 Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review Bilika, Paraskevi Paliouras, Achilleas Savvoulidou, Konstantina Arribas-Romano, Alberto Dimitriadis, Zacharias Billis, Evdokia Strimpakos, Nikolaos Kapreli, Eleni J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Review Article Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) is a psychophysical battery of various tests developed to quantify the subjects’ self-reported sensory experience. Although the use of QST is valuable for the clinical assessment of pain, standard evaluation protocols have not yet been established. This systematic review aimed to investigate the level of evidence for the psychometric properties of QST in healthy and patients with shoulder pain. Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published until August 2021. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve studies were included for qualitative synthesis, which included three different tests (Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Temporal Summation (TS)). As the body of evidence consisted of studies of low methodological quality, the psychometric properties of PPT, CPM, and TS in healthy and patients with shoulder pain were classified as unknown. Although there is a risk that the conclusions may be ‘superficial’ in nature, the reliability seems to be nearly excellent for the PPT, however, the protocols’ variation and the low methodological quality of the studies do not allow for clear conclusions. Further studies are required for the CPM and TS in patients with shoulder pain. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9976178/ /pubmed/36856109 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bilika, Paraskevi Paliouras, Achilleas Savvoulidou, Konstantina Arribas-Romano, Alberto Dimitriadis, Zacharias Billis, Evdokia Strimpakos, Nikolaos Kapreli, Eleni Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title | Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title_full | Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title_short | Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review |
title_sort | psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilikaparaskevi psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT paliourasachilleas psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT savvoulidoukonstantina psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT arribasromanoalberto psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT dimitriadiszacharias psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT billisevdokia psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT strimpakosnikolaos psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview AT kaprelieleni psychometricpropertiesofquantitativesensorytestinginhealthyandpatientswithshoulderpainasystematicreview |