Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States

BACKGROUND: Geographic areas have been developed for many healthcare sectors including acute and primary care. These areas aid in understanding health care supply, use, and outcomes. However, little attention has been given to developing similar geographic tools for understanding rehabilitation in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reistetter, Timothy A., Dean, Julianna M., Haas, Allen M., Prochaska, John D., Jupiter, Daniel C., Eschbach, Karl, Kuo, Yong-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2
_version_ 1784899054064369664
author Reistetter, Timothy A.
Dean, Julianna M.
Haas, Allen M.
Prochaska, John D.
Jupiter, Daniel C.
Eschbach, Karl
Kuo, Yong-Fang
author_facet Reistetter, Timothy A.
Dean, Julianna M.
Haas, Allen M.
Prochaska, John D.
Jupiter, Daniel C.
Eschbach, Karl
Kuo, Yong-Fang
author_sort Reistetter, Timothy A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geographic areas have been developed for many healthcare sectors including acute and primary care. These areas aid in understanding health care supply, use, and outcomes. However, little attention has been given to developing similar geographic tools for understanding rehabilitation in post-acute care. The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize post-acute care Rehabilitation Service Areas (RSAs) in the United States (US) that reflect rehabilitation use by Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: A patient origin study was conducted to cluster beneficiary ZIP (Zone Improvement Plan) code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) with providers who service those areas using Ward’s clustering method. We used US national Medicare claims data for 2013 to 2015 for beneficiaries discharged from an acute care hospital to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), skilled nursing facility (SNF), long-term care hospital (LTCH), or home health agency (HHA). Medicare is a US health insurance program primarily for older adults. The study population included patient records across all diagnostic groups. We used IRF, SNF, LTCH and HHA services to create the RSAs. We used 2013 and 2014 data (n = 2,730,366) to develop the RSAs and 2015 data (n = 1,118,936) to evaluate stability. We described the RSAs by provider type availability, population, and traveling patterns among beneficiaries. RESULTS: The method resulted in 1,711 discrete RSAs. 38.7% of these RSAs had IRFs, 16.1% had LTCHs, and 99.7% had SNFs. The number of RSAs varied across states; some had fewer than 10 while others had greater than 70. Overall, 21.9% of beneficiaries traveled from the RSA where they resided to another RSA for care. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation Service Areas are a new tool for the measurement and understanding of post-acute care utilization, resources, quality, and outcomes. These areas provide policy makers, researchers, and administrators with small-area boundaries to assess access, supply, demand, and understanding of financing to improve practice and policy for post-acute care in the US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9976368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99763682023-03-02 Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States Reistetter, Timothy A. Dean, Julianna M. Haas, Allen M. Prochaska, John D. Jupiter, Daniel C. Eschbach, Karl Kuo, Yong-Fang BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Geographic areas have been developed for many healthcare sectors including acute and primary care. These areas aid in understanding health care supply, use, and outcomes. However, little attention has been given to developing similar geographic tools for understanding rehabilitation in post-acute care. The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize post-acute care Rehabilitation Service Areas (RSAs) in the United States (US) that reflect rehabilitation use by Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: A patient origin study was conducted to cluster beneficiary ZIP (Zone Improvement Plan) code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) with providers who service those areas using Ward’s clustering method. We used US national Medicare claims data for 2013 to 2015 for beneficiaries discharged from an acute care hospital to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), skilled nursing facility (SNF), long-term care hospital (LTCH), or home health agency (HHA). Medicare is a US health insurance program primarily for older adults. The study population included patient records across all diagnostic groups. We used IRF, SNF, LTCH and HHA services to create the RSAs. We used 2013 and 2014 data (n = 2,730,366) to develop the RSAs and 2015 data (n = 1,118,936) to evaluate stability. We described the RSAs by provider type availability, population, and traveling patterns among beneficiaries. RESULTS: The method resulted in 1,711 discrete RSAs. 38.7% of these RSAs had IRFs, 16.1% had LTCHs, and 99.7% had SNFs. The number of RSAs varied across states; some had fewer than 10 while others had greater than 70. Overall, 21.9% of beneficiaries traveled from the RSA where they resided to another RSA for care. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation Service Areas are a new tool for the measurement and understanding of post-acute care utilization, resources, quality, and outcomes. These areas provide policy makers, researchers, and administrators with small-area boundaries to assess access, supply, demand, and understanding of financing to improve practice and policy for post-acute care in the US. BioMed Central 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9976368/ /pubmed/36859285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Reistetter, Timothy A.
Dean, Julianna M.
Haas, Allen M.
Prochaska, John D.
Jupiter, Daniel C.
Eschbach, Karl
Kuo, Yong-Fang
Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title_full Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title_short Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States
title_sort development and evaluation of rehabilitation service areas for the united states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2
work_keys_str_mv AT reistettertimothya developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT deanjuliannam developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT haasallenm developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT prochaskajohnd developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT jupiterdanielc developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT eschbachkarl developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates
AT kuoyongfang developmentandevaluationofrehabilitationserviceareasfortheunitedstates