Cargando…
Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x |
_version_ | 1784899097090588672 |
---|---|
author | Kaira, Kyoichi Yamaguchi, Ou Naruse, Ichiro Umeda, Yukihiro Honda, Takeshi Watanabe, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kosuke Yanagisawa, Shin Kasahara, Norimitsu Higuchi, Tetsuya Hashimoto, Kosuke Miura, Yu Shiono, Ayako Mouri, Atsuto Imai, Hisao Iizuka, Kunihiko Ishizuka, Tamotsu Minato, Koichi Suda, Satoshi Kagamu, Hiroshi Mori, Keita Seki, Nobuhiko Kuji, Ichiei |
author_facet | Kaira, Kyoichi Yamaguchi, Ou Naruse, Ichiro Umeda, Yukihiro Honda, Takeshi Watanabe, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kosuke Yanagisawa, Shin Kasahara, Norimitsu Higuchi, Tetsuya Hashimoto, Kosuke Miura, Yu Shiono, Ayako Mouri, Atsuto Imai, Hisao Iizuka, Kunihiko Ishizuka, Tamotsu Minato, Koichi Suda, Satoshi Kagamu, Hiroshi Mori, Keita Seki, Nobuhiko Kuji, Ichiei |
author_sort | Kaira, Kyoichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced NSCLC who had 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose PET or CT at baseline, and 4 and 9 weeks after PD-1 blockade, were registered. Therapeutic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the immune-modified RECIST (irRECIST), the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the immune-modified PERCIST (iPERCIST), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for dichotomous groups, such as responders vs. non-responders and controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. Cohen’s κ was used to evaluate the concordance among the different criteria. RESULTS: The concordance between CT and PET response criteria was fair or slight for responders vs. non-responders, but the agreement between iPERCIST and irRECIST was moderate for controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. The agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST in detecting responders was higher in the application of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than in the standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)(peak). To distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease, RECIST, irRECIST, and PET criteria (PERCIST, iPERCIST, and EORTC) defined by MTV or TLG were found to be significant predictors of progression-free survival. To distinguish responders from non-responders, iPERCIST by SUL(peak) or EORTC by TLG were identified as significant indicators. The EORTC criteria using TLG for the detection of responders or uncontrolled diseases had a significantly higher predictive value for response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC criteria based on TLG for the early detection of responders and uncontrolled disease were effective as a response assessment at 4 weeks after the PD-1 blockade. When SUL(peak) was not used but MTV or TLG was, the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST was almost perfect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99764992023-03-02 Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer Kaira, Kyoichi Yamaguchi, Ou Naruse, Ichiro Umeda, Yukihiro Honda, Takeshi Watanabe, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kosuke Yanagisawa, Shin Kasahara, Norimitsu Higuchi, Tetsuya Hashimoto, Kosuke Miura, Yu Shiono, Ayako Mouri, Atsuto Imai, Hisao Iizuka, Kunihiko Ishizuka, Tamotsu Minato, Koichi Suda, Satoshi Kagamu, Hiroshi Mori, Keita Seki, Nobuhiko Kuji, Ichiei Cancer Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced NSCLC who had 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose PET or CT at baseline, and 4 and 9 weeks after PD-1 blockade, were registered. Therapeutic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the immune-modified RECIST (irRECIST), the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the immune-modified PERCIST (iPERCIST), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for dichotomous groups, such as responders vs. non-responders and controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. Cohen’s κ was used to evaluate the concordance among the different criteria. RESULTS: The concordance between CT and PET response criteria was fair or slight for responders vs. non-responders, but the agreement between iPERCIST and irRECIST was moderate for controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. The agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST in detecting responders was higher in the application of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than in the standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)(peak). To distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease, RECIST, irRECIST, and PET criteria (PERCIST, iPERCIST, and EORTC) defined by MTV or TLG were found to be significant predictors of progression-free survival. To distinguish responders from non-responders, iPERCIST by SUL(peak) or EORTC by TLG were identified as significant indicators. The EORTC criteria using TLG for the detection of responders or uncontrolled diseases had a significantly higher predictive value for response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC criteria based on TLG for the early detection of responders and uncontrolled disease were effective as a response assessment at 4 weeks after the PD-1 blockade. When SUL(peak) was not used but MTV or TLG was, the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST was almost perfect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9976499/ /pubmed/36859341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaira, Kyoichi Yamaguchi, Ou Naruse, Ichiro Umeda, Yukihiro Honda, Takeshi Watanabe, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kosuke Yanagisawa, Shin Kasahara, Norimitsu Higuchi, Tetsuya Hashimoto, Kosuke Miura, Yu Shiono, Ayako Mouri, Atsuto Imai, Hisao Iizuka, Kunihiko Ishizuka, Tamotsu Minato, Koichi Suda, Satoshi Kagamu, Hiroshi Mori, Keita Seki, Nobuhiko Kuji, Ichiei Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title | Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title_full | Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title_short | Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
title_sort | comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after pd-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kairakyoichi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT yamaguchiou comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT naruseichiro comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT umedayukihiro comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT hondatakeshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT watanabesatoshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT ichikawakosuke comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT yanagisawashin comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT kasaharanorimitsu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT higuchitetsuya comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT hashimotokosuke comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT miurayu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT shionoayako comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT mouriatsuto comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT imaihisao comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT iizukakunihiko comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT ishizukatamotsu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT minatokoichi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT sudasatoshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT kagamuhiroshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT morikeita comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT sekinobuhiko comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer AT kujiichiei comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer |