Cargando…

Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer

PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaira, Kyoichi, Yamaguchi, Ou, Naruse, Ichiro, Umeda, Yukihiro, Honda, Takeshi, Watanabe, Satoshi, Ichikawa, Kosuke, Yanagisawa, Shin, Kasahara, Norimitsu, Higuchi, Tetsuya, Hashimoto, Kosuke, Miura, Yu, Shiono, Ayako, Mouri, Atsuto, Imai, Hisao, Iizuka, Kunihiko, Ishizuka, Tamotsu, Minato, Koichi, Suda, Satoshi, Kagamu, Hiroshi, Mori, Keita, Seki, Nobuhiko, Kuji, Ichiei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x
_version_ 1784899097090588672
author Kaira, Kyoichi
Yamaguchi, Ou
Naruse, Ichiro
Umeda, Yukihiro
Honda, Takeshi
Watanabe, Satoshi
Ichikawa, Kosuke
Yanagisawa, Shin
Kasahara, Norimitsu
Higuchi, Tetsuya
Hashimoto, Kosuke
Miura, Yu
Shiono, Ayako
Mouri, Atsuto
Imai, Hisao
Iizuka, Kunihiko
Ishizuka, Tamotsu
Minato, Koichi
Suda, Satoshi
Kagamu, Hiroshi
Mori, Keita
Seki, Nobuhiko
Kuji, Ichiei
author_facet Kaira, Kyoichi
Yamaguchi, Ou
Naruse, Ichiro
Umeda, Yukihiro
Honda, Takeshi
Watanabe, Satoshi
Ichikawa, Kosuke
Yanagisawa, Shin
Kasahara, Norimitsu
Higuchi, Tetsuya
Hashimoto, Kosuke
Miura, Yu
Shiono, Ayako
Mouri, Atsuto
Imai, Hisao
Iizuka, Kunihiko
Ishizuka, Tamotsu
Minato, Koichi
Suda, Satoshi
Kagamu, Hiroshi
Mori, Keita
Seki, Nobuhiko
Kuji, Ichiei
author_sort Kaira, Kyoichi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced NSCLC who had 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose PET or CT at baseline, and 4 and 9 weeks after PD-1 blockade, were registered. Therapeutic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the immune-modified RECIST (irRECIST), the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the immune-modified PERCIST (iPERCIST), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for dichotomous groups, such as responders vs. non-responders and controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. Cohen’s κ was used to evaluate the concordance among the different criteria. RESULTS: The concordance between CT and PET response criteria was fair or slight for responders vs. non-responders, but the agreement between iPERCIST and irRECIST was moderate for controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. The agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST in detecting responders was higher in the application of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than in the standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)(peak). To distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease, RECIST, irRECIST, and PET criteria (PERCIST, iPERCIST, and EORTC) defined by MTV or TLG were found to be significant predictors of progression-free survival. To distinguish responders from non-responders, iPERCIST by SUL(peak) or EORTC by TLG were identified as significant indicators. The EORTC criteria using TLG for the detection of responders or uncontrolled diseases had a significantly higher predictive value for response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC criteria based on TLG for the early detection of responders and uncontrolled disease were effective as a response assessment at 4 weeks after the PD-1 blockade. When SUL(peak) was not used but MTV or TLG was, the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST was almost perfect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9976499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99764992023-03-02 Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer Kaira, Kyoichi Yamaguchi, Ou Naruse, Ichiro Umeda, Yukihiro Honda, Takeshi Watanabe, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kosuke Yanagisawa, Shin Kasahara, Norimitsu Higuchi, Tetsuya Hashimoto, Kosuke Miura, Yu Shiono, Ayako Mouri, Atsuto Imai, Hisao Iizuka, Kunihiko Ishizuka, Tamotsu Minato, Koichi Suda, Satoshi Kagamu, Hiroshi Mori, Keita Seki, Nobuhiko Kuji, Ichiei Cancer Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced NSCLC who had 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose PET or CT at baseline, and 4 and 9 weeks after PD-1 blockade, were registered. Therapeutic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the immune-modified RECIST (irRECIST), the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the immune-modified PERCIST (iPERCIST), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for dichotomous groups, such as responders vs. non-responders and controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. Cohen’s κ was used to evaluate the concordance among the different criteria. RESULTS: The concordance between CT and PET response criteria was fair or slight for responders vs. non-responders, but the agreement between iPERCIST and irRECIST was moderate for controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. The agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST in detecting responders was higher in the application of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than in the standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)(peak). To distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease, RECIST, irRECIST, and PET criteria (PERCIST, iPERCIST, and EORTC) defined by MTV or TLG were found to be significant predictors of progression-free survival. To distinguish responders from non-responders, iPERCIST by SUL(peak) or EORTC by TLG were identified as significant indicators. The EORTC criteria using TLG for the detection of responders or uncontrolled diseases had a significantly higher predictive value for response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC criteria based on TLG for the early detection of responders and uncontrolled disease were effective as a response assessment at 4 weeks after the PD-1 blockade. When SUL(peak) was not used but MTV or TLG was, the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST was almost perfect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9976499/ /pubmed/36859341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaira, Kyoichi
Yamaguchi, Ou
Naruse, Ichiro
Umeda, Yukihiro
Honda, Takeshi
Watanabe, Satoshi
Ichikawa, Kosuke
Yanagisawa, Shin
Kasahara, Norimitsu
Higuchi, Tetsuya
Hashimoto, Kosuke
Miura, Yu
Shiono, Ayako
Mouri, Atsuto
Imai, Hisao
Iizuka, Kunihiko
Ishizuka, Tamotsu
Minato, Koichi
Suda, Satoshi
Kagamu, Hiroshi
Mori, Keita
Seki, Nobuhiko
Kuji, Ichiei
Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title_full Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title_short Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
title_sort comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after pd-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00538-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kairakyoichi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT yamaguchiou comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT naruseichiro comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT umedayukihiro comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT hondatakeshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT watanabesatoshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT ichikawakosuke comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT yanagisawashin comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT kasaharanorimitsu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT higuchitetsuya comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT hashimotokosuke comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT miurayu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT shionoayako comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT mouriatsuto comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT imaihisao comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT iizukakunihiko comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT ishizukatamotsu comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT minatokoichi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT sudasatoshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT kagamuhiroshi comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT morikeita comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT sekinobuhiko comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer
AT kujiichiei comparativeanalysisofdifferentresponsecriteriaatearlyphaseafterpd1blockadeinnonsmalllungcancer