Cargando…
Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study
Previous electroencephalography studies have yielded evidence for automatic processing of syntax and lexical stress. However, these studies looked at both effects in isolation, limiting their generalizability to everyday language comprehension. In the current study, we investigated automatic process...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309221098116 |
_version_ | 1784899126345859072 |
---|---|
author | Coopmans, Cas W. Struiksma, Marijn E. Coopmans, Peter H. A. Chen, Aoju |
author_facet | Coopmans, Cas W. Struiksma, Marijn E. Coopmans, Peter H. A. Chen, Aoju |
author_sort | Coopmans, Cas W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous electroencephalography studies have yielded evidence for automatic processing of syntax and lexical stress. However, these studies looked at both effects in isolation, limiting their generalizability to everyday language comprehension. In the current study, we investigated automatic processing of grammatical agreement in the face of variation in lexical stress. Using an oddball paradigm, we measured the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Dutch-speaking participants while they listened to Dutch subject–verb sequences (linguistic context) or acoustically similar sequences in which the subject was replaced by filtered noise (nonlinguistic context). The verb forms differed in the inflectional suffix, rendering the subject–verb sequences grammatically correct or incorrect, and leading to a difference in the stress pattern of the verb forms. We found that the MMNs were modulated in both the linguistic and nonlinguistic condition, suggesting that the processing load induced by variation in lexical stress can hinder early automatic processing of grammatical agreement. However, as the morphological differences between the verb forms correlated with differences in number of syllables, an interpretation in terms of the prosodic structure of the sequences cannot be ruled out. Future research is needed to determine which of these factors (i.e., lexical stress, syllabic structure) most strongly modulate early syntactic processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99766392023-03-02 Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study Coopmans, Cas W. Struiksma, Marijn E. Coopmans, Peter H. A. Chen, Aoju Lang Speech Articles Previous electroencephalography studies have yielded evidence for automatic processing of syntax and lexical stress. However, these studies looked at both effects in isolation, limiting their generalizability to everyday language comprehension. In the current study, we investigated automatic processing of grammatical agreement in the face of variation in lexical stress. Using an oddball paradigm, we measured the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Dutch-speaking participants while they listened to Dutch subject–verb sequences (linguistic context) or acoustically similar sequences in which the subject was replaced by filtered noise (nonlinguistic context). The verb forms differed in the inflectional suffix, rendering the subject–verb sequences grammatically correct or incorrect, and leading to a difference in the stress pattern of the verb forms. We found that the MMNs were modulated in both the linguistic and nonlinguistic condition, suggesting that the processing load induced by variation in lexical stress can hinder early automatic processing of grammatical agreement. However, as the morphological differences between the verb forms correlated with differences in number of syllables, an interpretation in terms of the prosodic structure of the sequences cannot be ruled out. Future research is needed to determine which of these factors (i.e., lexical stress, syllabic structure) most strongly modulate early syntactic processing. SAGE Publications 2022-06-02 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9976639/ /pubmed/35652369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309221098116 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Coopmans, Cas W. Struiksma, Marijn E. Coopmans, Peter H. A. Chen, Aoju Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title | Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title_full | Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title_fullStr | Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title_short | Processing of Grammatical Agreement in the Face of Variation in Lexical Stress: A Mismatch Negativity Study |
title_sort | processing of grammatical agreement in the face of variation in lexical stress: a mismatch negativity study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309221098116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coopmanscasw processingofgrammaticalagreementinthefaceofvariationinlexicalstressamismatchnegativitystudy AT struiksmamarijne processingofgrammaticalagreementinthefaceofvariationinlexicalstressamismatchnegativitystudy AT coopmanspeterha processingofgrammaticalagreementinthefaceofvariationinlexicalstressamismatchnegativitystudy AT chenaoju processingofgrammaticalagreementinthefaceofvariationinlexicalstressamismatchnegativitystudy |